JSin
Bench
Well the law in this case is very close to how baseball uses it's rules. If you are convicted of steriod use, you are guilty, regardless of reason, and suspended. Now, the difference is the question of character of a person, one who would cheat knowingly versus a person who gets caught without knowing he was doing so in the first place. But it's still cheating in the eyes of baseball.6th said:This is an interesting conversation. JSin, driving 90 miles per hour might be "breaking the law" but that is different than "cheating." How would you explain the difference in the two?
BTW - good to see you J. It's been too long.
But... it has to be proven first. Which isn't being done by those who are assuming he is guilty. All they have is hearsay from a sealed hearing in which Bonds never admitted to taking steriods knowingly or without knowledge. Simply that he "could have"... and to be honest, everyone "could have". Like my earlier example... if there is steriods in my icy-hot I'm a steriods user. But it's false logic to assume that some steriods are "clear" or "cream" and Bonds took a clear and cream substance so these must be steriods. Doesn't work that way.
6th- Nice to see you to girl, hope everything is well.