We have cap space to acquire players.
We have a commitment by ownership and the FO to spend significantly to improve the team.
We need a new CBA to know how much we have and how much players will demand and how much we want to spend.
First money to go to Dalembert or his replacement - lots of money but we have part in present salary.
We need a decision on how long we are committed to PG/SG of Evans/Thornton. That decision tells us how much and what quality of a veteran PG we spend on. If we go with them then our greater investment can be in an upgrade at SF.
So, three things seem determinants in our spending, they are shown in their apparent order:
1) CBA signed and sealed.
2) Dalembert resigned or replaced.
3) Decision on how long on Evans/Thornton combo use,
a) Short term, then put first money in vet PG.
b) Longer term, then put first money on vet SF.
After that, fill in as necessary.
It seems too simple when stated this way. I would enjoy others observations, suggestions, criticisms, etc.
We have a commitment by ownership and the FO to spend significantly to improve the team.
We need a new CBA to know how much we have and how much players will demand and how much we want to spend.
First money to go to Dalembert or his replacement - lots of money but we have part in present salary.
We need a decision on how long we are committed to PG/SG of Evans/Thornton. That decision tells us how much and what quality of a veteran PG we spend on. If we go with them then our greater investment can be in an upgrade at SF.
So, three things seem determinants in our spending, they are shown in their apparent order:
1) CBA signed and sealed.
2) Dalembert resigned or replaced.
3) Decision on how long on Evans/Thornton combo use,
a) Short term, then put first money in vet PG.
b) Longer term, then put first money on vet SF.
After that, fill in as necessary.
It seems too simple when stated this way. I would enjoy others observations, suggestions, criticisms, etc.