Greener pastures, HOW ?
He apparently took lesser money, he was not making both the actual money and the extra that Webber is making now. We dont know if Jazz wanted to retain him, they wanted to go in a different direction and so did he, they did not treat him well during the final years.
Very similar, chosing a team that is a contender with or without you but can be significantly benefitted by adding another experienced player. Impact is not expected and teams fortunes dont depend on that impact, but if there is any that is a bonus for the team.
If he had joined the knicks and taken them to the playoffs, maybe, maybe I will give some credit.
You're joking, right? "Being sarcastic"?
You're a stat man, no? Here's a stat for you: Before Webber joined the Pistons, they were 21-15, a .583 winning percentage. After he signed with them for the veteran mininum, the Pistons went 32-14, a .695 average.
You say the team's fortune didn't depend on his impact, but I disagree wholeheartedly. In fact, that impact contributed to the Pistons propelling themselves above the Cavaliers, Wizards and Bulls to lock up the first seed in the Eastern conference.
Webber isn't the franchise player for the Pistons, but he's showing up the Kings front office, the Sixers front office, and pretty much anyone who doubted that he could be an impact player on a contending team. And what's so impressive to me is that he joined a team whose core had been in place for several seasons already, and blended in almost seamlessly. His presence has translated into more wins for the Pistons. Can't say Karl Malone's presence with the 2004 Lakers did the same; in fact, he spent a large part of the season riding the bench with various injuries.
Malone did not reduce the effort on the court during the Jaz days just cos he didnt like what was going on, you could get the same effort day in and day out, unlike some who tanked it cos they couldnt survive in the system and was pouting every day to the team, media and the owner. Was fined for missing the last game of the season, whether it is relevant game or not you are expected to play the game, are the other 10 guys who showed up fools.
Webber didn't get used in Philly like he was a player who could make a significant impact. I'm not saying he was right for missing the last game of the season; in fact, he was wrong. But the Sixers organization - starting with Jim O'Brien and continuing with Mo Cheeks - misappropriated a huge asset they had at their disposal. Just goes to show how poorly that team has been run since Pat Croce left.
I understand that there is a relationship between Webber and this fan base but I also see that you guys are far more lenient to him than with any other player including some of your own, past or present.
Webber didn't leave the Kings of his own accord; in fact, at a time when other players were making it clear that they didn't want to be here anymore, he was very vocal about his desire to stay and win a championship. And we appreciate his dedication to his fans.
Malone, on the other hand, jumped ship to go play for the Lakers - who were attempting to put together a Dream Team that was all but guaranteed a championship. Joined the bandwagon, had an impact, but was obviously riding the coattails of two players who were much more dominant than he was. There's really no comparison, except that they both played for the minimum.