Voisin: With search now a wash, hire Brooks

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
http://www.sacbee.com/kings/story/213526.html

Ailene Voisin: With search now a wash, hire Brooks
By Ailene Voisin - Bee Columnist
Last Updated 1:08 am PDT Saturday, June 9, 2007
Story appeared in SPORTS section, Page C1


MANTECA -- Enough of Stan Van Gundy's undercover visit to Kinko's and his clumsy departure from the lobby of a downtown Sacramento hotel. Enough of the interviews and the waiting game. Enough of subconsciously hoping for their Al Gore to jump into the race.

The Kings can clean up this mess with a one-hour trip to the car wash.

Scott Brooks was theirs all along. He was there all last weekend -- at a family-owned establishment called "Dribbles" -- spraying cars, wiping windows, chatting up customers, anxiously monitoring developments while Geoff Petrie and the Maloofs met for a second time with coaching candidates Van Gundy and Kurt Rambis.

"Scott knows I'm going to put him to work when he comes down here," said his mother, Lee, who manages the car wash located just west of Route 99, "but I think he's a little nervous about this (Kings situation). I think it was just an excuse to come home."

This is home, this is where he wants to be, this is Brooks. Blue collar, farmland, San Joaquin Delta College, Northern California. Your basic soap and water guy. The search should end right down the street, or, as he often jokes about his background, on the other side of the tracks.

Superstars Jerry Sloan, Gregg Popovich, Phil Jackson and Pat Riley are unavailable. Don Nelson was last season's blown opportunity. Larry Brown travels with too much baggage for Petrie. Jeff Van Gundy failed to excite the Kings basketball president even before his older brother signed with the Orlando Magic while at a Kinko's located mere miles from Arco Arena. Bill Laimbeer's outsized personality intimidates. John Whisenant's résumé lacks NBA experience. And for varying reasons, the experienced Rick Carlisle, P.J. Carlesimo and Terry Porter don't have Petrie and the Maloofs linking hands and screaming, "Here's our Al Gore!"

But Rambis impressed. Brian Shaw intrigued. Bill Cartwright could receive another look, as will Brooks.

So might as well conserve energy anyway. Just hire the guy.

As one longtime NBA insider observed the other night from afar, when no obvious candidate emerges -- and Stan Van Gundy was an obvious front-runner -- teams hire on potential rather than past accomplishments. Accordingly, it's always wiser to hire someone you know, someone familiar with the organization and its personnel and, in this instance, someone who witnessed what wrong went last season and understands what not to do in the future.

And, yes, Brooks can finally spill the news. Though widely known within the organization, the distance between head coach Eric Musselman and his lead assistant stretched the width of the Grand Canyon. They were an odd couple constantly at odds. Yet out of loyalty to his boss -- and the fact that he played for the late Bill Musselman -- Brooks kept his reservations private and publicly supported his coach.

Would he have dealt with Ron Artest and Mike Bibby differently? Been more forceful and less concerned with keeping 12 grumpy guys happy?

This is all a guessing game -- don't all candidates have all the answers? Based on his past, this much is known of Scotty Brooks: In spite of his boyish, almost cherubic features and warm, engaging manner, he is a tough, in-your-face competitor with abundant survival skills.

Born in French Camp, Brooks is the youngest of seven children reared by a single mother. Lee Brooks, a wiry, vibrant woman who, in blue jeans, long-sleeve T-shirt and sneakers, also appears younger than her 74 years, made auto parts for a living. For extra cash, the Brooks youngsters worked the nearby farms, harvesting onions and picking walnuts. But Scott, she says, raced off to the gym at every opportunity, later starring at East Union High School and Delta College before excelling at UC Irvine.

"All I ever heard was, 'Doctor J, Doctor J (Julius Erving),' " she said with a grin when surprised by a visitor the other day at Dribbles. "All Scott ever wanted to do was play in the NBA."

Generously listed as a 5-foot-11 point guard, the undersized Brooks went undrafted in 1987 but earned a tryout with the 76ers. He went on to play a reserve role for six teams in 10 seasons, including the 1994 NBA champion Houston Rockets. He was hired as an assistant by the Denver Nuggets in 2003, then pursued a job with the Kings last offseason largely to be closer to his family -- and the family business he purchased six years ago.

Situated on the main business strip in Manteca, the car wash is a 24-hour, mostly self-serve establishment, with the vacuum bays located in the back, behind six drive-through stalls. A seventh stall is reserved for the more involved express service that requires an employee to apply the pre-rinse and broom-sweep the exterior.

Underneath a sign featuring the image of a basketball splashed into a water bucket, the prices are listed as follows: A "layup" costs $6. A "3-point play" goes for $7. The "slamdunk" -- wash, wax, dry and tires inclusive -- tops out at $8.

"Scott called me on Monday," Lee said in a conspiratorial whisper, "and he said he was sore all over. He said he hadn't worked that hard in a long time."

Pause.

"Have you heard anything about the Kings job?" she asked. "We sure hope he gets it."

About the writer: Reach Ailene Voisin at (916) 321-1208 or avoisin@ sacbee.com.
 
Aileen, this is supposed to make me feel better? I should have washed my car instead of reading this crap. :p
 
"someone familiar with the organization and its personnel and, in this instance, someone who witnessed what wrong went last season and understands what not to do in the future."

great point
 
"someone familiar with the organization and its personnel and, in this instance, someone who witnessed what wrong went last season and understands what not to do in the future."

great point

I agree. I mean, I'm not much inspired by the fact that he has a good rapport with the players because it's really easy to be the good guy when you're not making the touch choices on playing time and roles and things like that, but at least he has seen what didn't work, knows the players' personalities the organization, which should give him a leg up. It might not make him a better coach in the long run, but there's something to be said for it.
 
Then again Muss saw what went wrong in the first 20 games and he didn't change. He then saw what went wrong the next 20 and didn't change ect...ect... Scott Brooks can't do any more with this team than Muss did. Now if we were to somehow get a great or even a good big man this offseaon and Brooks is the coach he will look good when all the while it isn't him. Basically I still feel the players are 99% and the coach is 1%. Give the Mike Brown and the Cavs without Lebron and i garuntee they aren't in the playoffs much less the championship series. Now give me Lebron and the Cavs coached by....hell Jonathan Davis and they are a playoff team.

In other words we could get Phil Jackson, Pat Riley, Red, Brick whomever it don't matter unless we get some decent players to coach.
 
Her love letter to hire Brooks scares hell out of me. Let's just say dipping into last year's coaching staff would give me the same feeling as a root canal.
 
ok...why? Sure, brooks stepped in for a couple of games and we won. big deal, it's foolish to think he'd be a good head coach for something he did in 1 season as an assistant and a couple of games. We went from Rick Adelman, then we screwed up, then tried to hire names like Stan Van Gundy, and now we're about to screw up again. I want someone with a little more experience, accomplishments and just a better resume.
 
Her love letter to hire Brooks scares hell out of me. Let's just say dipping into last year's coaching staff would give me the same feeling as a root canal.

I think you're being unfair to Voisin AND to Scott Brooks.

She's made some good points about the available people to fill the slot and I personally have no problem with giving Brooks a chance. He's earned the right. He's been a player, he's coached ina variety of situations and he's served time at the feet of George Karl. In addition, he managed to maintain the respect of the players during last year's debacle. That's a lot more important than I think some are realizing.

PoundForPound - Brooks has had FOUR years as an assistant coach in the NBA.
 
Funny some people would maybe like Brooks better if he HADN'T been a Kings assistant last year. I mean was already one of the premier top assistants who was due for his shot before last season.

I'll welcome him, or PJ with equal enthusiasm (due to PJ's hardware). Either of those guys would make a fine coach.
 
Scott Brooks can't do any more with this team than Muss did.

Wrong.

The players respect Scott Brooks. Scott Brooks respects the players. That is very important. In addition, the two games Brooks coached were as different as night and day from those Musselman was in charge of. You saw consistency in substitutions, even logic in the types of plays being run. You know, plays? The things Musselman apparently didn't have power point presentations to cover?

We aren't going to fix this team in one year. I think Scott Brooks could do a fully adequate job as head coach while we're trying to rebuild. And if he does good enough, he might be our coach for the foreseeable future. I personally would love NOT to be going through this whole mess again in a couple of years.
 
We have to make the right choice because like Grant and Mike said on there show last week the Kings are looking to hire a guy who can be here for 8 to 10 years, not a "stopgap" guy who is just here for a year or two.
 
Her love letter to hire Brooks scares hell out of me. Let's just say dipping into last year's coaching staff would give me the same feeling as a root canal.

Ditto.

I don't play favorites when Voison starts doing this stuff -- always alarming, always makes me wonder about the target.

Still creeped out by the possibility Brooks may just be an expert in office politics -- distance himself/stab in the back the unpopular out of favor guy (Muss), go to the office gossip gal and butter her up and get her to put in a good word. Cozy up to the immediate boss. And then of course deliver a rousing anti-Muss power point to the CEOs, and voila!
 
We have to make the right choice because like Grant and Mike said on there show last week the Kings are looking to hire a guy who can be here for 8 to 10 years, not a "stopgap" guy who is just here for a year or two.


That's nice, but if that were really the case, I think our search parameters have been flawed. VERY few NBA coaches last 8-10 years. I think at the time Rick was let go he was one of only three (Sloan, Pop, Rick). And hiring a largely unknown guy, which is what we have been interviewing, the odds head down to crapshoot level (not impossible, but maybe 1 in 50 wil make it that long).

We were quick enough to fire Muss, but I do hope that this doesn't mean we will hang onto a guy just to hang onto him if he's mediocre. There will be financial incentives to do that for a few years until Muss's deal runs out. Of course if anything I think we were too quick to fire the best coach on the market this summer, but that's because he was the best coach on the market and immensely accomplished. Everybody theoretically wants to hire somebody long term, just so long as the underlying basis for the long term is doing a good job, not just being retianed because of the principle of hiring long term.
 
Still creeped out by the possibility Brooks may just be an expert in office politics -- distance himself/stab in the back the unpopular out of favor guy (Muss), go to the office gossip gal and butter her up and get her to put in a good word. Cozy up to the immediate boss. And then of course deliver a rousing anti-Muss power point to the CEOs, and voila!

What I've heard just doesn't bear that out.
 
No to SB

Wrong.

The players respect Scott Brooks. Scott Brooks respects the players.

He's been an assistant coach for four long years. Keyword assistant. Whether he'll be able to take the next big step is beyond me, but how do you know who respects who? Nobody can say they respect scott brooks except the players themselves, they know if it would work with SB. Quite frankly, I agree with the fact that Scott cannot do any more with this team than what Musselman did. We need someone who won't get stomped on by our grumpy guys, someone who is willing to let them play to their strenghts while at the same time being strict enough to keep things in check. I believe we had that someone just before he signed a contract with the Orlando Magic. What I'm saying is we don't need another coach who's new to doing what he is about to try and do, which is taking a team back to the playoffs and this time, not sitting behind the man making all the decisions.
 
Everyone has to start somewhere, PFP. You move up by being an assistant coach, hopefully into a head coaching position. I've read articles with quotes by players who say they respect Scott Brooks. I believe two of them were Mike Bibby and Ron Artest. I've heard people in a very good position to know these things say the players respect Scott Brooks.

We aren't getting Rick Adelman back. We aren't going to get Gregg Popovich, Stan Van Gundy or Phil Jackson. Whomever we get will come with some unknowns. I'm sorry but your arguments don't make much sense whatsoever.
 
Everyone has to start somewhere, PFP. You move up by being an assistant coach, hopefully into a head coaching position. I've read articles with quotes by players who say they respect Scott Brooks. I believe two of them were Mike Bibby and Ron Artest. I've heard people in a very good position to know these things say the players respect Scott Brooks.

We aren't getting Rick Adelman back. We aren't going to get Gregg Popovich, Stan Van Gundy or Phil Jackson. Whomever we get will come with some unknowns. I'm sorry but your arguments don't make much sense whatsoever.


Actually if we are going to keep Ron(depending on how much the Maloofs still like him and considering his value is at an all time low) I think Brooks is a great option because you know Ron likes him/respects him/plays hard for him. You don't know if Ron will respect the other options. Then again, Ron could definitely be traded so who knows.
 
Perhaps SVG was the best coach potentially available to us. (Actually, I think Adelman was the best coach available this summer.) Let's face it, tho, SVG didn't really want to come to Sac. We were seriously in position for his services for the less than 24 hours that the Magic had a new coach. It was pretty clear SVG gave the Magic a deadline to get clear of BD and they did it.

Where do people think great coaches come from? Springing forth fully-formed from the head of Naismith? I have my doubts that a great coach would see Sac as very appealing at the moment, anyway.

If Brooks gets the job, I'll assume they see something in him and hear positive things about him from others (like from George Karl). Last year, the Warriors were shocked that nobody from the Kings called them to ask about Muss before he was hired. I'm assuming there is more research/homework being done this summer.

Is it the easy and cheap solution? Maybe. That doesn't necessarily make it the wrong decision. I'd like to know who would be a hire that would really wow the majority of Kings fans, anyway?
 
Last edited:
The way I see it, who we hire to be our next coach is irrelevant with our roster. We should try and hire a well respected player's coach, if for the sole reason that it might make it easier to hire free agents in the future. We aren't going anywhere in the next couple of years anyway.
 
Everyone has to start somewhere, PFP. You move up by being an assistant coach, hopefully into a head coaching position. I've read articles with quotes by players who say they respect Scott Brooks. I believe two of them were Mike Bibby and Ron Artest. I've heard people in a very good position to know these things say the players respect Scott Brooks.

We aren't getting Rick Adelman back. We aren't going to get Gregg Popovich, Stan Van Gundy or Phil Jackson. Whomever we get will come with some unknowns. I'm sorry but your arguments don't make much sense whatsoever.

ok i'll speak in terms easy enough for you understand. Basically, if we want a winning team, we were going to need a coach with a successful history, we tried going for the "new head coach" route with Musselman and it didn't work. If we're hoping to pull ourselves an Avery Johnson situation, that doesn't happen very often. In my opinion, unless we make a number of significant moves, our guys are not going to try their hardest for a rookie head coach.
 
We really aren't or shouldn't, be terribly worried about a winning team next season.

But this next guy cannot be a failure. The repect issue is significant. Another reason why it would be helpful to trade the vets. Young coach + young players is a better fit than young coach + old grumpy guys blaming him for why they can't get it done anymore.
 
Ditto.

I don't play favorites when Voison starts doing this stuff -- always alarming, always makes me wonder about the target.

Still creeped out by the possibility Brooks may just be an expert in office politics -- distance himself/stab in the back the unpopular out of favor guy (Muss), go to the office gossip gal and butter her up and get her to put in a good word. Cozy up to the immediate boss. And then of course deliver a rousing anti-Muss power point to the CEOs, and voila!


If he's is smart and dirty enough to do that then we need to hire this guy now!
 
ok i'll speak in terms easy enough for you understand. Basically, if we want a winning team, we were going to need a coach with a successful history, we tried going for the "new head coach" route with Musselman and it didn't work. If we're hoping to pull ourselves an Avery Johnson situation, that doesn't happen very often. In my opinion, unless we make a number of significant moves, our guys are not going to try their hardest for a rookie head coach.

Basically, we're in no position to be worrying about a winning team right now. What part of "rebuilding" don't you understand?

Your opinion about the players not wanting to try their hardest for a rookie head coach is based upon what exactly?

EVERY single successful head coach in the NBA was a rookie once. It makes no sense to summarily dismiss ANY candidate because he hasn't held a head coaching position.

You keep talking about a mythical "coach with a successful history." Just whom do you have in mind, pray tell?
 
Besides us, who else is interested in hiring Scott Brooks? Is Petrie again choosing the path of least resistance? And getting along with Bibby and Artest is probably no small feat, but are either of those guys going to be back next year?
 
Besides us, who else is interested in hiring Scott Brooks?

So unless somebody else wants him, a potential candidate is going to be summarily passed over?

What's right for one team right now may not be right for another team. If you fall in love with someone and then learn no one else was pursuing them does that make your choice somehow less right for you?

Again, I'm not saying Scott Brooks is going to be a future HOF coach. I'm not saying he's going to be the next Rick Adelman. All I'm saying is I firmly believe he has a right to be in the mix and I'd have no real problem if he was selected.

People keep narrowing the options without looking realistically into who is really available.
 
Last edited:
Basically, we're in no position to be worrying about a winning team right now. What part of "rebuilding" don't you understand?

Your opinion about the players not wanting to try their hardest for a rookie head coach is based upon what exactly?

EVERY single successful head coach in the NBA was a rookie once. It makes no sense to summarily dismiss ANY candidate because he hasn't held a head coaching position.

You keep talking about a mythical "coach with a successful history." Just whom do you have in mind, pray tell?

ego. there's some evidence for you last season, the only one i can really say tried their hardest is Corliss Williamson. I want PJ Carlesimo, he is so much better than Scott Brooks. Scott who? enough no-names.
 
how is PJ better than Scott? Simple, compare San Antonio and Sacramento. Bada-bing.
 
Back
Top