Two Trade Ideas - Big Man & Cap Space

Uncia03

Starter
So in my opinion the three major needs for this team are:

1.) A defensive/rebounding big man. (Preferably a star, though not realistic)
2.) A full-sized Shooting Guard who can force opposing teams to put their PG on Tyreke. This SG will also need to play defense, spread the floor, and handle the ball.
3.) Another star to pair with Tyreke if at all possible, which means getting cap space/good draft picks.

---------------

As I was going through shooting guards trying to find one who I thought would fit, it just seemed to me that Francisco really is one of the best (non-star) fits out there to play SG next to Tyreke. He's always had that defensive tenacity and good handles for a SG, and last year he showed to be very good a spreading the floor and knocking down 3s.

I believe that Kevin is a better player, and I like him quite a bit, but I actually think that Garcia would compliment Tyreke (and these new Kings) far more than Kevin, because in addition to the things I listed above, we also don't have to tailor the offense around Garcia.

-------------
So if the idea is to trade Kevin and move Garcia to the two (thereby opening up room for Donte and Omri), I was trying to see if there were any young, good defensive Centers that we could get for Kevin.

The problem is that teams don't trade away good young defensive centers unless the trade is blatantly in their favor. So since we won't be able to get a star big man for Kevin, I'm settling for just a young defensive center, who will most likely be a far better fit for this team.

Trade idea #1

Sacramento Out:
Kevin Martin

Sacramento In:
Joakim Noah (I don't really like him, but you can't ignore what he's doing this year)
Jerome James ($6.6m Expiring) You cut him immediately as we don't want a repeat of the trash bag incident.
Future 1st or 2nd round pick (Whatever we might be able to get)

Chicago Out:

Joakim Noah
Jerome James
Future 1st or 2nd round pick

Chicago In:
Kevin Martin

Why Sacramento does this:
We trade our best asset to bring to the team what it needs most. A young, hustling, defensive, rebounding big man. We also save an enormous amount of money in this trade, and as mentioned earlier, Cisco moves permanently to the 2 guard, and therefore frees up space for Donte and Omri.

Why Sacramento doesn't do this:
Joakim Noah is a knucklehead, and we have no idea if he's going to be able to consistantly play at this high of a level. Jerome James and the Kings don't mix.

Why Chicago does this:
They by far get the best player in this trade. They have really missed Ben Gordan as a pure scoring threat, and Salmons has not at all been cutting it at the 2-guard. Kevin will really help with the explosiveness of this team.

Why Chicago doesn't do this:
They may be too high on Joakim considering his recent play, and perhaps they think they can bring in someone better than Martin with Jerome Jame's 6.6m expiring.

------------------------------

Ok, let's say the first trade actually goes down. We've traded Kevin for a big man, and obtained a nice expiring in Jerome James. This second trade would be to clear up a ton of cap space to actually make a push for a star player in the upcoming free-agency. And if we don't actually get a star player in 2010, then our payroll would be incredibly low, allowing us to be major players as a 3rd team, while setting our sites for 2011.

Trade Idea #2


Sacramento Out:
Beno Udrih
Andres Nocioni
Kenny Thomas ($8.7m Expiring)

(Maybe throw in a future pick if that is what was needed to get this done)

Sacramento In:
Tracy McGrady ($22.8m Expiring)
Jermaine Taylor

Houston Out:
Tracy McGrady
Jermaine Taylor

Houston In:
Beno Udrih
Andres Nocioni
Kenny Thomas

Why the Kings do this:
Basically we do this to get two of our three largest/longest contracts off the books in Beno and Nocioni. Beno's play has been good, so if we can move his contract for expirings then we should do so.
This would obviously clear up the logjam and allow Donte/Casspi to have almost all of the minutes at the 3 spot.
Making this move in conjunction with the 1st trade would basically turn our $8.7m expiring of KT into a $29.4m expiring of McGrady/Jerome. Obviously we could bring in a major star in 2010, or if things don't work out, be a great 3rd team to make deals work, while being a major player in 2011.
Now, obviously we lose a lot of talent in this trade, but I'd rather clear up space for the young guys, and spend our money on filling in the pieces we need while giving us a shot at being a major player in free-agency.
As far as McGrady goes, we can either play him or cut him. I'm not certain he will ever be the player he used to be. Obviously with his size, handles, and shooting ability he would be fantastic as a partner with Tyreke if he has any game left at all.

Why the Kings don't do this:
If the intention is to just use McGrady as an expiring, it's a lot of talent to give up.
Beno has been playing superb basketball, and Nocioni really does make a difference for this team. So losing Beno, and some of the hustle/toughness intangibles of Nocioni might be a bit much for the Kings to swallow.

Why the Rockets do this:
Both Beno and Nocioni would fit in perfectly with the Rockets, and they'd definately be a playoff team this year. The Rockets need a point-guard with size who can shoot and either be the lead guard, or play the 2-guard next to Brooks.
Nocioni just fits perfectly with the type of team that Adelman has assembled this year.
So if their goal is to make the playoffs this year, this trade would certainly do that for them by giving them two pieces which would fit very well with their current team.
With KT in the trade, they still get to take advantage of his $8.9mil expiring to bring in a good player in the offseason.
There was also that little incident a week or two ago regarding Rick and Tracy, so the Rockets might be thinking of trying to get some value for McGrady.


Why the Rockets don't do this:
The either think that McGrady can be a positive force for them this year, or they have other plans with McGrady's Expiring.

----------

After the two above trades the Kings Roster would look like:

PG: Tyreke/Sergio/Jermain Taylor
SG: Francisco/McGrady/Casspi/Udoka
SF: Donte/Casspi/McGrady
PF: JT/Hawes/Brockman/May
C: Joakim/Hawes

Payroll for next year: Approx. $23.5m with Francisco being our highest paid player at $5.5m.

With a Salary cap projected between $51m - $55m, we'd easily have enough room to bring in one star player, if not two. We'd obviously need to sign some players in order to get above the minimum salary cap, but with that much free money, we'd at least have the opportunity to shoot for something big.

Next, if you look at the above line-up, we have a good defensive team at all spots except the PF. And not only is that a defensive team, they are all hustle players, so we'll win games due to sheer scrappiness. If Joakim can keep his play at the level it's been thus far, I'd say we'd have a good chance of squeaking into the playoffs this year, and that is such a young team, that you could be developing chemistry for years to come.

Finally, as far as free-agents go, the number 1 player I'd be looking to bring over would be Joe Johnson, he's a bit old, but he would be the perfect player to pair up with Tyreke Evans.

So if we can't land a LBJ/DWade/Bosh (which we won't be able to do), then bringing in Joe Johnson would give us a dominating guard line-up, and if Donte can play into the player he's capable of, then I think we'd be pretty set. If we can't get Joe Johnson, or if Francisco flourishes in a role next to Tyreke, we could see about bringing in Amare. He'd also work out pretty well in that line-up.
Also, because we'd be so far below the cap, we'd have the money to bring in support bench players to fill in whatever needs we might see, and if this team flourishes, we might even be able to bring in role-players on the cheap.

Youth, potential stars, defense/hustle, and financial flexibility = Potential Championship success.
I'd rather land LBJ/DWade/Bosh, but if we can't make that happen, then I'd love to pull off something of this nature.
 
I don't understand why people always say "Kmart is a great 2nd option...." then we draft a star.....and want to now trade Kmart. I love the idea of Kmart and Evans playing together.
 
I don't understand why people always say "Kmart is a great 2nd option...." then we draft a star.....and want to now trade Kmart. I love the idea of Kmart and Evans playing together.

yeah right now we have our 1st option on the floor with a bunch of 3rd and 4th options. We need Kevin.
 
I don't understand why people always say "Kmart is a great 2nd option...." then we draft a star.....and want to now trade Kmart. I love the idea of Kmart and Evans playing together.
I think it's just because the team played soooo much better the second kmart went out. Obviously a small sample size, let's see how we play when he comes back and then decide where to go from there.
 
I don't understand why people always say "Kmart is a great 2nd option...." then we draft a star.....and want to now trade Kmart. I love the idea of Kmart and Evans playing together.


There is no such a thing as a "great second option" that's universal and fits every player and every team. Its not fantasy basketball.

I've said before, name the time that putting a one dimensional high volume scorer on the perimeter has worked with a star level ball dominant guard/SF type. It doesn't. They fight over the ball. Occupy the same spaces.

Who is CP3s 2nd? David West, PF.
Deron's? Carlos Boozer, PF.
Who was Nash's? Amare Stoudemire, PF/C.
Kobe's? Gasol/Shaq PF/Cs
Roy's? Aldridge, PF.
Wade's? Shaq, C.
TMacs? Yao, C.
Payton? Kemp, PF.
KJ? Barkley/Chambers, PFs.


Noticing a pattern? There are reasons for that. You put a pure scoring guard out with those type players and they typically have to be 17-18ppg stay out of the way players or they become detriments. Players that the ball dominant player can kick out to if need be -- Raja Bell etc., but who can contribute even if the ball is not coming their way. And that's before we get to Kevin being basically the anti of every bit of team identity we have developed as we started to win.

Last year I was trying to construct scenarios/pairings that would have worked using Kevin as one of the pieces. I saw possible synergy with guys like Amare, or Bosh. Never with a guy like Tyreke. And our limited sample set at the beginning of the year seems to underscore that. They were in the same backcourt, but they did not realy play together. Reke had the ball, or Kevin had the ball. Nobody else ever had the ball.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why people always say "Kmart is a great 2nd option...." then we draft a star.....and want to now trade Kmart. I love the idea of Kmart and Evans playing together.

Kevin's been the player I've most enjoyed watching for the last 2-3 seasons, and I've rooted heavily for him to succeed. He isn't a superstar, but he's a very, very, good player, and I'm not down on him for not being a superstar.

Here is my thought process:

If Kevin comes back and fits into the offense fairly well and is able to be more effective on defense then I think we'll win more games. His height will probably force opposing teams to put their PG on Tyreke, and his shooting will really be able to spread the floor. I think it's something which can work out very well, and it's something that I really want to see in action.

With that said, I don't think our team can make the playoffs this year, even if the Kevin/Tyreke thing works out as well as I think it can work out. The reason being, that we desparately need defense, especially interior defense, in order to win these games we're barely losing right now. If we'd had a better defending/rebounding big man last night to check the boards, we probably would have won the game against Phoenix.

I'm a far bigger fan of Martin than I am of Garcia, but Garcia can add the important SG elements that Martin can (Size and spreading the floor), while being better than Martin at two very important elements. (Ball handling & Defense (including some weakside defense))

So if Garcia can fit better into the SG position along side Tyreke than Martin, then the very best thing we can do is trade our star player in Martin for something which will help make us a playoff team today. That piece is a defensive/rebounding big man to help with our defense.

Now, if we actually managed to trade KT straight-up for Okafor, then our most glaring need would have been met, and then I'd definately not even consider trading Martin unless it was for a superstar/guaranteed top 3 draft pick/ect.

Regardless of how much I like Kevin, until we address our most glaring need in getting a defensive big man, I will continue support the idea of using our most valuable trading chip to get it filled.
 
Who is CP3s 2nd? David West, PF.
Deron's? Carlos Boozer, PF.
Who was Nash's? Amare Stoudemire, PF/C.
Kobe's? Gasol/Shaq PF/Cs
Roy's? Aldridge, PF.
Wade's? Shaq, C.
TMacs? Yao, C.
Payton? Kemp, PF.
KJ? Barkley/Chambers, PFs.
Nice analysis... Jordan was the only guy who really won without a star big.
 
I've said before, name the time that putting a one dimensional high volume scorer on the perimeter has worked with a star level ball dominant guard/SF type. It doesn't. They fight over the ball. Occupy the same spaces.

Who is CP3s 2nd? David West, PF.
Deron's? Carlos Boozer, PF.
Who was Nash's? Amare Stoudemire, PF/C.
Kobe's? Gasol/Shaq PF/Cs
Roy's? Aldridge, PF.
Wade's? Shaq, C.
TMacs? Yao, C.
Payton? Kemp, PF.
KJ? Barkley/Chambers, PFs.


KMart is someone who plays better w/o the ball and likes to take threes and cut to the basket. Evans is a player who needs the ball and like to get to the rim.

They don't occupy the same space and offensively they may very well compliment each other. There are of course adjustment but history has shown that it can work. In fact, there have been many successful pairings of two stud perimeter offensive players. There is no truth to the observation that you must have the big man as the #2 next to a star guard.

Example:

Cassell/ Glen Robinson / Ray Allen
Billups / Rip
Clyde Drexler / Terry Porter
Isiah Thomas / Joe Dumars

And most recently:

Derrick Rose/ Salmons/ Deng


The key is that the two perimeter guys cannot fight for the ball like how AI fought with Iguiodala and Salmons in Philly. For it to work, one guy serves as the facilitator, the playmaker, and the second guy serves mostly as a finisher. When you see Kmart and the way he plays, not only will he not fight for the ball with anyone, most of the time he doesn't even want the ball until he's ready to shoot. That's why KMart is almost a natural #2 - he doesn't pound the ball, he plays better moving off the ball, he usually takes shots within the offense, and he usually score a lot of pts without taking a lot of shots.

Lastly, I dont know where the idea was started that Kmart must take 50 shots a game to be happy. There is no hint of any sort that he has the Iverson sydrome. I actually think he wouldn't have a problem being a 17pt scorer if that's what needed from him for the team to win.

Now, can a Martin/Evans backcourt work? Time will tell but you have to give them a shot at trying. If the worry is defense then here's the thing, name one team that won a championship because of their great defensive guards. No, champions won besause of great defensive bigs, defensive guards are luxury but not a necessity.
 
Nothing is happening to K-Martin this season unless somewhere comes knocking with an extra lotto pick and the re-incarnation of bobby jackson. It doesn't serve the kings to shop martin, and he probably is the best player available at sg for the kings, even if there was a trade. We aren't going to get Vince Carter, Kobe, Lebron, Wade; K-mart is a great consolation prize. And Beno is playing his way into something, im not sure if he will be starting next week or traded for Speights/Kapono. Martin is staying put because we still don't know how teams are going to be able to stop Martin if tyreke is getting alll the attention he has been getting.
 
Back
Top