That could give us a chance at him. But he's an injury prone guy who could be asking for millions more than Daly. It becomes a major risk when the guy was earnign $12.6mil last year and in the last 3 seasons has played 45, 51, and 74 gms. I happen to like Chandler and was arguing for him for years even before he broke out in New Orleans. But his $$ to risk ratio is daunting when compared to a guy like Dalembert who has missed 2 games in the last 5 years.
To be fair, Chandler has played 10 seasons, and in 7 of those seasons he's played in 70 plus games. So he's really only had 3 injury plagued seasons out of ten. Unfortunately, 2 of those have been recently. So the question is, are those two seasons an abberation, or the coming norm? Thats the gamble your taking when you pursue him. Overall, if healthy, I think he's a better fit than Dalembert. He never demands the ball and still gets his 10 or so pts a game. He's not quite the shotblocker that Dalembert is, but his man defense in the post, as in denying position etc. is better. He's also a better defender away from the basket in defending the pick and roll.
I'd be happy with either of them, but I prefer Chandler. But there is a risk. I'd perfer no more than a 3 yr contract at best, or 4 yr's at worse to coincide with the ending of Tyreke's or Cousins contracts.