Okay, Don Draper. You can keep your "That's what the money is for"-type arguments for justifying why you think it's cool to bash players; I ain't here for none of that.
Nah. If you think that the Heat, minus LeBron, would have still been considered a "superteam," then that term loses any meaning, to me. He was the reason that the Heatles were "super." And, to the extent that he "formed" a "superteam," so the **** what? What kind of bull**** purity test nonsense criteria is that, anyway? LeBron plus anybody better than Mo Williams was going to be a "superteam," just because LeBron James was on it. Or, would he have had to do what only one other superstar in the history of the NBA has ever done (and he only did it once, and in a watered-down season), and carry a bunch of dudes to a championship, without another superstar, in order to be considered valid, in your eyes?
Criticizing LeBron for "forming" a superteam in Miami is basically blaming him for Wade and Bosh not wanting to live in Cleveland. Which... why the hell would you hold that against LeBron?