I keep seeing people refer to Artest as variations of "impact player", "top 15 talent" and etc. Like we think we could trade him for an allstar or something. I don't really see Ron that way anymore. And I'm not arguing the potential isn't there, just like everyone I watched him be an impact player from game to game. And you can't watch him have a good game without falling in love with the bulldog intensity, and maybe just the sheer fun of having an intimidating force on our side.
So all that potential is still there after 8 years but in terms of putting it together and having an impact-player type YEAR in the NBA, he's had maybe 1. Maybe, and even then not as a lead guy, more as a Rodmanesque sidekick, which is Ron's best role really.
After 8 years in the league I don't see the kind of offensive game that makes me think he could be a Kobe type scorer, ever. Nowhere close. On defense alone with a little scoring he could be a Wallace-Bowen type midlevel star if he kept his head together, for sure. But that's not the game-changing impact player you ride to a championship like some people make it out to be.
There's just so much hype with Artest and fans saying he could be this and what if that. He has such an awesome focus of willpower (sometimes) during a game that its hard to believe he couldn't be the biggest force in the NBA. But he hasn't done it, and he isn't doing it here. Also back problems are a huge red flag to me.
I know a lot of people have more faith in Ron's stardom than I do and I don't want to argue it really....it could still happen but he (IMO) would need to be in his happy zone and this obviously ain't it. It's looking more and more like something is up so there's more discussion about where Artest ranks among the top players of the league. But you can't even have that discussion without starting it with a big fat if.
Getting Ron Artest was a big gamble like taking a chance on a weirdo draft pick or something. And if we end up trading him that's how the next team down the line is going to look at it too, even more than we did.
So all that potential is still there after 8 years but in terms of putting it together and having an impact-player type YEAR in the NBA, he's had maybe 1. Maybe, and even then not as a lead guy, more as a Rodmanesque sidekick, which is Ron's best role really.
After 8 years in the league I don't see the kind of offensive game that makes me think he could be a Kobe type scorer, ever. Nowhere close. On defense alone with a little scoring he could be a Wallace-Bowen type midlevel star if he kept his head together, for sure. But that's not the game-changing impact player you ride to a championship like some people make it out to be.
There's just so much hype with Artest and fans saying he could be this and what if that. He has such an awesome focus of willpower (sometimes) during a game that its hard to believe he couldn't be the biggest force in the NBA. But he hasn't done it, and he isn't doing it here. Also back problems are a huge red flag to me.
I know a lot of people have more faith in Ron's stardom than I do and I don't want to argue it really....it could still happen but he (IMO) would need to be in his happy zone and this obviously ain't it. It's looking more and more like something is up so there's more discussion about where Artest ranks among the top players of the league. But you can't even have that discussion without starting it with a big fat if.
Getting Ron Artest was a big gamble like taking a chance on a weirdo draft pick or something. And if we end up trading him that's how the next team down the line is going to look at it too, even more than we did.