Steve Kerr's West Rankings

Bballkingsrock

All-Star
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AmmyVi7iBqz9izmmKgiSC0a8vLYF?slug=sk-westrankings100305&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Just two years ago, the Western Conference resembled the world order prior to the fall of the Soviet Union: Two superpowers – the Lakers and Spurs – muscling each other for supremacy, each team's every move geared towards beating the other. But with Shaquille O'Neal's departure to South Beach, the Lakers franchise fell faster than the Berlin Wall, leaving San Antonio as the lone power out west.

So while contenders like Phoenix, Houston and Denver hustle and try to figure out how to topple San Antonio's dynasty, the Spurs simply sit back, count their rings and add pieces to a puzzle that is already complete. Michael Finley and Nick Van Exel make the defending champs that much scarier. As a result, the Western Conference appears to be a race for second place.

That race, though, will be very interesting. What the conference lacks in elite teams, it more than makes up in depth. As many as 13 teams have a realistic shot at the playoffs, with only Portland and New Orleans being non-factors.

This is how the West looks – from the top to the bottom – going into training camp.

1. San Antonio Spurs – The rich get richer. The Spurs return everyone. Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili are in their prime and now the Spurs have Finley and Van Exel. Oh my.

2. Phoenix Suns – They got tougher and stronger defensively in the offseason. But will they still be able to run past people?

3. Houston Rockets – Yes, the backcourt is aging, but Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady looked awfully good together in the postseason. They should break through in a big way this season.


4. Denver Nuggets – They took off under George Karl when he was hired in midseason. Now Carmelo Anthony and company have him for a full year.


5. Sacramento Kings – How good is Geoff Petrie? He managed to overhaul an aging, overpaid roster and transform it into a good young team. All in the span of one year.


6. Dallas Mavericks – They lost their leader in Steve Nash last season, and now they've lost their heart and soul in Michael Finley. The Mavs will miss him more than they think.


7. Utah Jazz – The Jazz hope they finally have their replacement for John Stockton in Deron Williams. The key for this team, though, is staying healthy.


8. Los Angeles Lakers – Phil Jackson returns, and he'll solidify this club. Kobe Bryant is still one of the top-five players in the NBA, but who will play alongside him at the point position?


9. Golden State Warriors – The Warriors might be the surprise team of the season. They're young, fast and fearless. If Baron Davis stays healthy, they could be in the playoffs for the first time since 1994.


10. Seattle SuperSonics – Can the Sonics repeat their magical season of a year ago? It will be tough to do, especially without Antonio Daniels and Jerome James.


11. Minnesota Timberwolves – The Wolves felt like they achieved addition by subtraction by unloading Latrell Sprewell and Sam Cassell. But there wasn't much of a talent upgrade this offseason.


12. Memphis Grizzlies – They also shed themselves of some malcontents and added solid veterans in Damon Stoudamire, Eddie Jones and Bobby Jackson. But they won't be enough to get the Grizzlies back to the playoffs.


13. Los Angeles Clippers – It's the same old story for the Clips. They have loads of talent, but will it all fit together? There are so many scorers but not enough distributors. One basketball won't be enough for this group.


14. Portland Trail Blazers – Nate McMillan takes over and gives the Blazers hope for the future, but they're still a few years away from contending.
15. New Orleans Hornets – As if things weren't bad enough for this franchise, now they're displaced from their home due to Hurricane Katrina and will play in Oklahoma City. The Hornets are in for a long season.

I would have put us 4th over the Nuggets but this is from Steve Kerr who put us twice as worse so I guess it is ok since it is from him.
 
Thanks, Bball!

You gotta admire Steve Kerr. He wears his Spurs homerism like a Armani suit!

;)
 
Last year he said - we were # 10 and we ended up 6th

This year he said we are #5 - so You do the math
------------------------------------------------------------

Personally, I am still trying to figure out why he still has a job ?
 
He was hired under the little-known but widely enforced "I played with Michael Jordan so you HAVE to give me a job" clause of the CBA.

;)
 
Kerr is definitely a homer, but in this case, I'd say calling San Antonio #1 in the west is pretty much a no-brainer.
 
You'll get no argument from me, D-Mass. The part that cracked me up was:

So while contenders like Phoenix, Houston and Denver hustle and try to figure out how to topple San Antonio's dynasty, the Spurs simply sit back, count their rings and add pieces to a puzzle that is already complete. Michael Finley and Nick Van Exel make the defending champs that much scarier. As a result, the Western Conference appears to be a race for second place.

The way Kerr makes it sound, you'd think the Spurs had to count a lot higher than - oh, I don't know - two?

;)
 
Strange on Denver, as Denver only added Earl Watson. They just tried or were rumored for Pierce/Finley/Sprewell.
 
piksi said:
Last year he said - we were # 10 and we ended up 6th

This year he said we are #5 - so You do the math
------------------------------------------------------------

Personally, I am still trying to figure out why he still has a job ?

haha, i like your math
 
The only "problem" I have with his rankings is Denver. Yes, they ended on a high note (pre-playoffs) but I do not think they should be 4. Top 10, yes - top 5, not so sure.
 
VF21 said:
He was hired under the little-known but widely enforced "I played with Michael Jordan so you HAVE to give me a job" clause of the CBA.

;)
So why is it that the only gig that Rodman can get is in a side show?
 
atleast we are ranked higher than the mavs, lakers, twolves and sonics... only the teams that we havent lost to in the playoffs are higher than us.... that should be worth mentioning.....
 
chelle said:
The only "problem" I have with his rankings is Denver. Yes, they ended on a high note (pre-playoffs) but I do not think they should be 4. Top 10, yes - top 5, not so sure.
Exactly they should be 6th or 7th.
 
HndsmCelt said:
So why is it that the only gig that Rodman can get is in a side show?

That particular clause of the CBA doesn't specify what KIND of job, leaving it open to interpretation. Kerr must have a better agent.

;)
 
VF21 said:
That particular clause of the CBA doesn't specify what KIND of job, leaving it open to interpretation. Kerr must have a better agent.

;)

Yeah, even "Jabba the Krause" got a job as a talent scout for the Yankees after he left the Bulls
 
I think he makes an interesting point about us. IF (AND A BIG IF) the Kings return to championship contention- a legit threat to make the WCF- what Geoff has done is nothing short of amzing.

He would have essentially taken a team that was old and hobbled (Doug, Webber, Bjax always injurred and past their primes) was cash strapped (ridiculously far over the cap), and had no depth, and turned it into a younger, healthier, less cap-plauged (although still over), deep, championship contender with only one wasted season. And that "wasted" season was a 50 win playoff appearance. Not too bad if this team turns out to be a top 3 team in the West...
 
HndsmCelt said:
So why is it that the only gig that Rodman can get is in a side show?

It is later explained that the clause will be immediately nullified if said player shows up at a book signing in a wedding dress.
 
Forget it guys, just cancel the season and give the trophy to the spurs. You might as well continue TDOS. ;E
 
GoGoGadget said:
It is later explained that the clause will be immediately nullified if said player shows up at a book signing in a wedding dress.

I wondered what that part said. There was a Ben & Jerry's spoon to mouth malfunction, and I wasn't sure of the fine print.
 
These are the worst rankings I've ever seen in my life, aside for the blatant homerism, it just doesn't offer anything in the form of an explanation. Not sure I would even consider using it as TP.
 
i think steve kerr's all right. sure he loves the spurs, but I think his rankings are more or less fair.
 
chelle said:
The only "problem" I have with his rankings is Denver. Yes, they ended on a high note (pre-playoffs) but I do not think they should be 4. Top 10, yes - top 5, not so sure.

where would you put us in the west?

im glad you put us in the TOP TEN in the west. how nice of you.
 
NugzFan said:
where would you put us in the west?

im glad you put us in the TOP TEN in the west. how nice of you.

Remember, this is a Kings board. The fact we mention other teams at all should be taken into consideration. ;)

Sorry if we're not as gung-ho about your team as you are...

No need for the sarcasm. We all try and get along around here.
 
VF21 said:
Remember, this is a Kings board. The fact we mention other teams at all should be taken into consideration. ;)

Sorry if we're not as gung-ho about your team as you are...

No need for the sarcasm. We all try and get along around here.

i didnt say anything about gung ho - in fact im FAR less optimistic for my team than most here for theirs or other teams. i love reading offseason predictions because everyone thnks their team is waaaay better than they really are (apparently about 28 teams will be above .500, 25 teams will make the playoffs, 18 will make it to round 2). it all changes early in the regular season. fortunately ive learned over the years, and curb my enthusiasm and optimism accordingly.

i was curious because he/she said we are a "top 10" team. wtf does that mean? even the most adamant nugget hater wouldnt even go that low.
 
No, what she said was:

Yes, they ended on a high note (pre-playoffs) but I do not think they should be 4. Top 10, yes - top 5, not so sure.

"I do not think they should be 4" is a lot different than how you're taking it. She says the Nuggets are definitely in the top 10, but she's not sure they should be in the top 5. At this point, I think that's a perfectly valid statement to make. She is entitled to her opinion. She gave it without rancor; it should be taken that way.

wtf does that mean? even the most adamant nugget hater wouldnt even go that low.

You're reading way too much into it.
 
Houston ahead of us???


Sorry, Yao Ming really doesn't scare me all that much and I think McGrady has won a total of 1 playoff series in his career. Adding Smith was nice but the guys got the brain of a pea.
 
NugzFan said:
i was curious because he/she said we are a "top 10" team. wtf does that mean? even the most adamant nugget hater wouldnt even go that low.
really? nuggets won't make the playoffs.
 
Back
Top