A prior GM managing an asset poorly is no justification for continuing to manage that asset poorly. I understand that a lot of Kings fans just want to "cut bait and move on" because Marvin Bagley is not Luka Doncic, but at $7 million and 22 years of age, Bagley would have some utility as an offensive spark off the bench with a ceiling that remains unknown. You're not going to find a young big on the free agent market that you can comparably invest in that will bring utility to your bench with upside to burn. Hell, Tristan Thompson is making about $9 million a year just to be a veteran leader who is mildly competent on the defensive end.
Except for the whole “What has Bagley done to earn those starts and minutes” argument that is extremely valid in this case.
He’s a terrible pair next to the long-term freshly signed starter. Why should he start? It isn’t blatant MLB level screwing with guys’ service time to save money stuff here.
May be true. If Marvin is not part of the plan with this team, he's not worth the $7 mil either.
I’m not saying that there aren’t basketball reasons for him not to start. I’m just saying you shouldn’t make it about anything other than the basketball reasons!
2000 minutes is averaging 24.39 min per game for 82 games. Anyone think he will come close?Oh yeah, that’s fair. If he’s playing consistent minutes all year long and is on track to beat the minutes required, then suddenly gets 4 / 5 “rest” days to close the year that’s a whole different ball of yarn.
Oh wow. That’s huge.
Secondly, there is nothing to prevent Bagley from earning more. And if he does, good for both him and the team.
2000 minutes is averaging 24.39 min per game for 82 games. Anyone think he will come close?
At this point, I think Metu is a better player than Bags. Remove where they were picked and I don't think it's that crazy of an opinion.
Shouldn’t be an issue if he was a top 7 rotation player. I dont think he’ll be a top 7 rotation player though. Didn’t see anything in the pre-season to think he made a jump. Body looks the same, game looks the same, the light bulb hasn’t come on, on either side of the ball.
i do think this will be his first full season barring a freak injury. Or, let’s say, he misses less than 10 games. Contract year motivation.
Maybe a better fit, better player? Doubtful. Certainly not as productive in the minutes he plays.
BIG time overpay. Ew. As one of our competitors in the West, I’m happy about this, though. I think we have a chance to be a better team than they are as currently constructed and have more wins than they do if we stay healthy.
If anything the preseason showed it's going to be hard not to justify playing those guard lineups and not giving his minutes to any and potentially all 3 of Holmes, Len, and TT. This is going to get ugly. Possible both in the backcourt AND the frontcourt.
I don’t think we’ll be doing anything like that. If he doesn’t play a certain amount of minutes, the proof will be in the pudding, i imagine, as it’s been since he’s gotten here. I’m rooting for him harder than ever because i would honestly feel bad for him and us if it goes the negative way again. We shall see!If it's a business move trying to ensure a player doesn't make an extra $7 mil. by sitting him or other means, then the team is creating the toxic culture.
2000 minutes is roughly 23-24 minutes per night. So even without the starter thing, he just has to basically be an above average role player and stay healthy to qualify for the bigger QO.
Kings fans can laugh and joke about this. But this is what the non Kings fans see. Bad PR.
I expect the smear campaign against Marvin by the team to be coming soon.
2000 minutes is roughly 23-24 minutes per night. So even without the starter thing, he just has to basically be an above average role player and stay healthy to qualify for the bigger QO.
It’s not bad PR though. It’s smart GMing.
Kings fans can laugh and joke about this. But this is what the non Kings fans see. Bad PR.
I expect the smear campaign against Marvin by the team to be coming soon.
Honestly, I would be really surprised to see that. I know there are some on this board that feel like Marvin hasn't gotten the playing time he's needed to progress, but I think the overwhelming sentiment nationally is Marvin is a bust who can't stay on the floor. His agent's antics don't require the team to do anything as I think most would think they are pretty pathetic.
Kings fans can laugh and joke about this. But this is what the non Kings fans see. Bad PR.
I expect the smear campaign against Marvin by the team to be coming soon.
It didn't say permanently, it said opening night. And he had knee soreness. So ? he can get that 2k minutes with work no problem. *He's not in the rotation.
Unless he didn't actually have sore knees. I normally would not question a player's injury; however, there was generally something odd with the way he wasn't played in the last pre-season game.It didn't say permanently, it said opening night. And he had knee soreness. So ? he can get that 2k minutes with work no problem. *
* ok, maybe a problem for him, given what we've seen over 3 years.
unfortunately I am sure us + 29 other people noticed and his trade value is now "Ben Simmons but he sucks"Ohhh~~~~~ the burn~~~~~~
If this were a big market team, it would hit the news immediately. Since it’s Sac though, nobody gonna notice.