Unfortunately I have to agree that the Maloofs are penny wise and pound foolish enough to not even look at Sloan due to his price tag. I have a lot of respect for Sloan as a coach but I will also say that he may not be a good fit unless the team buys into his system and can handle his style. Bad a s Smart may be he DOES have the ear of the players. He can and should be replaced at some point but it will have to be for a clear upgrade that the players can see. McMillan or Van Grundy maybe Sloan is a longer shot but likely to get better results in the end. Also Sloan would give the team a leg up in the effort to lure AK47.
Unfortunately I have to agree that the Maloofs are penny wise and pound foolish enough to not even look at Sloan due to his price tag. I have a lot of respect for Sloan as a coach but I will also say that he may not be a good fit unless the team buys into his system and can handle his style. Bad a s Smart may be he DOES have the ear of the players. He can and should be replaced at some point but it will have to be for a clear upgrade that the players can see. McMillan or Van Grundy maybe Sloan is a longer shot but likely to get better results in the end. Also Sloan would give the team a leg up in the effort to lure AK47.
Feels like we have a coaching search every other year. The year we are looking no one good is available. The year we aren't there are several good coaches available. I'd be shocked if they fire Smart now.
i'd argue that it is NOT a positive when a bad coach has "the ear of the players." i don't want the kings' bad habits to persist any longer than they must under keith smart. but jerry sloan's fundamental approach to pick and roll basketball, and his commitment to the defensive side of the ball, are attractive features worth considering in a head coach. ****, i'd be willing to rent sloan for a couple of years just to instill some good habits in this basketball team, as opposed to the mountain of negatives brought on by gimmick ball...
I honestly believe that one season of Sloan will equate to 20 more wins. No joke. Do what it takes.
The second we extended Smart I knew it would be a HUGE mistake, and damnit, even during our off season I'm getting more and more pissed at our FO and we haven't even reached the draft lottery. There is no excuse for that extension about all of two weeks into his head coaching tenure here. We knew others would become available, and some of us were following the Sloan rumors closely and thought it was probable he'd want to re-enter the fray this summer.
I continue to have doubts becuase Sloan has NEVER successfully coached a team built anything like ours. Now in order to significantly change that perception I think you have to move Cousins to PF, bring back Dalembert as the shotblocking C, and...I have no idea what to do at PG. Sloan's system has always depended on great pure PGs. We have nobody close. He's always had big physical defenders at C and SF. We have nobody really close. Always had great PFs. That is what we would have to do with Cousins.
People like the name Sloan, but we are just built so counter to any team he has ever won with there are all sorts of questions. I'd roll th dice, sure. But there are other veteran coaches (McMillan, JVG) I'd roll the dice on a lot sooner becuase I've seen them win with players like ours.
I can't imagine any established coach being interested in joining a franchise with such uncetaintity and turmoil (primarily future ownership, location).
While what you say about Sloan and who he's coached for most of his career may be somewhat true, I think it needs to pointed out, that he inherited that team of Stockton and Malone, and got the most out of it he could. It wasn't as if he put the roster together the exact way he wanted and therefore had success. My point is, I don't think its fair to take the success he had and use it against him, and therefore assume thats he's incapable of coaching a different type of team. In 2004, after Stockton and Malone retired, Sloan posted a 42 and 40 record the next year with this great roster.
Andrei Kirilenko
Matt Harpring
Gordon Giricek
Carlos Arroyo
DeShawn Stevenson
Raja Bell
Roul Lopez
Greg Ostertag
Jarron Collins
Maurice Williams
Aleksandar Pavlovic
Mikki Moore
Ben Handlogten
Tom Gugliotia
Curtis Borchart
Paul Grant
Michael Ruffin
Keon Clark
Not exactly a lot of star power in that group of players. Most of which didn't play very much. Keon Clark for instance only played in 2 games. Harpring in around 30 games. Yet, he still managed to put up a winning record. I agree that for most of his career he always had a top PG on his roster. Something just about every coach would want. And one could argue that Sloan helped make Stockton into a winning PG. Its also possible that he might revive Tyreke's career as a PG. I would put more faith in Sloan doing that than I would Smart.
Yet he's interviewing with the Bobcats.
The critical comment.I'd love to have Sloan as a coach. And as Uncia03 pointed out, there's no more in your face coach than Calapari, and Cousins did just fine under him. I think Cousins is fine as long as your honest with him. When Calapari recruited him, he told him upfront, that he was going to be yelled at, and if he couldn't take it, then don't go to Kentucky. Knowing that, Cousins still went to Kentucky. Lest people forget, the great Karl Malone was a pretty tempermental guy in his early years with the Jazz, and he had his run in's with Frank Layden, and later with Sloan.
Sloan never won a championship, and I guess you can be critical of that, but his teams always won. In his 23 years of coaching there, he had 1 losing season, in 2004/05, when he went 26 and 56. In his first year, he took over from Layden after 17 games and with the team 11 and 6, and finished the season going 40 and 25. In his final year, with all the turmoil, he still posted a 31 and 21 record. Corbin didn't find it quite so easy with the same team going 8 and 20 to finish the season.
Personally I don't think his retiring was because he couldn't handle Derron Williams, but because he was just tired of the grind and needed a break to recharge his batteries. His last 5 or 6 years had been very trying. His wife had died, and he helped engineer one of the quickest rebuilds in league history. After going 26 and 56 in his only losing season, he bounced back the next season with a 41 and 41 record, and never looked back.
As I said, I'd love to have him, but unfortunately, I doubt it will happen. The Maloofs would have to eat Smarts contract, and then cough up some fairly large bucks to attract Sloan. The odds are pretty slim.. But one can hope..
I don't assume he CAN'T coach a different style team. I'm just more aware than many people who I think get caught by the fame, that he never has PROVEN he could. Maybe he can. But this is an old guy very set in his ways after 26 years of success, and basically something like 23 of those years with elite PG/PF pairings.
Of course it maybe says somethig that he is reported to be interested in Orlando & Charlotte, neither of which has anybody of note at PG or PF. But that may also just be because those are the first couple of places who have fired their coaches and he just wants back in anywhere, regardless of fit. Who knows, maybe even here despite everything.
Compare that to a guy like JVG who has coached Ewing & Yao and TMac and Sprewell, and you've got one coach who got famous coaching Cs and SGs and another who got famous coaching PGs and PFs. Our team looks a lot more like coach A's turf UNLESS we shift our two young stars back to their positions from a season ago.
I don't assume he CAN'T coach a different style team. I'm just more aware than many people who I think get caught by the fame, that he never has PROVEN he could. Maybe he can. But this is an old guy very set in his ways after 26 years of success, and basically something like 23 of those years with elite PG/PF pairings.
Of course it maybe says somethig that he is reported to be interested in Orlando & Charlotte, neither of which has anybody of note at PG or PF. But that may also just be because those are the first couple of places who have fired their coaches and he just wants back in anywhere, regardless of fit. Who knows, maybe even here despite everything.
Compare that to a guy like JVG who has coached Ewing & Yao and TMac and Sprewell, and you've got one coach who got famous coaching Cs and SGs and another who got famous coaching PGs and PFs. Our team looks a lot more like coach A's turf UNLESS we shift our two young stars back to their positions from a season ago.
Last Friday my wife and I were driving to Pasadena during the Lakers/Thunder game and I told her that I couldn't wait to get to our destination so I could watch the game on ESPN because SVG is a far better color analyst than the very biased L.A. radio station guys calling the game.
I then mentioned how I would love to have him as a coach for this team for the very reasons that you mentioned.
I would take SVG over Sloan, but my guess is that Sloan would be more available because he is in fact looking at the Bobcat job. So if he was actually willing to be the coach there, then he would probably considering being our coach as well.
I don't see the Maloofs offering to pay either coach, but if they were willing to fire Smart and make the smart move to hire a veteran coach, I could see Sloan saying 'Yes', while I'm not certain SVG would leave the broadcast booth and walk into the chaos that is our franchise.
It's so frustrating when you look at the potential positive direction we were heading by the end of last season to where we are now. If we somehow manage to get a top draft pick who can be a major piece for our team (sort of like how Ibaka really helps the Thunder's big 3) then it will have been worth it, but this organization has been burned so much on lottery day that I can't really get much enthusiasm for it this year.
JVG I hope, not SVG?
Whoops, yep JVG.
No way SVG is ever allowed near the organization after what happened last time, at least as long as the Maloofs are owners.