buddahead_916 said:Personally, no. I love Chris and what he did for our franchise but I don't think they will. Even if they decide to, it won't be for a long time seeing as though they just retired Mitch awile back.
VF21 said:I'm confused. If they retired Mitch Richmond's number, why wouldn't they retire Webber's?
buddahead_916 said:Just my opinion. The thread asked the question, I answered.
Personally I wish we were having the same discussion, but for #16 not #4.
buddahead_916 said:Personally I wish we were having the same discussion, but for #16 not #4.
Kingsgurl said:???? You wish we were discussing the retirement of Peja's number? Here's a little tip. The retirement of one players number is not contingent on any other players. CWebb's number will and SHOULD be retired for what he did for this organization. As others have stated, once he retires, I'm sure that will happen, just like the Rock's.
The time may come in Peja's career, when it is winding down, that we indeed do have this same discussion. Until then, would it be too much to ask to leave the Peja VS. Webber BS out of it?
buddahead_916 said:Your avatar tells the story behing ^^^^^
It does? Please explain that one to me. I don't get it.buddahead_916 said:Your avatar tells the story behing ^^^^^
VF21 said:Why? At this point, arguing whether or not Peja Stojakovic should have his number retired with the Kings would be purely based on how you feel about Peja. If you're saying you don't think Webber is worthy of having his number retired, I cannot begin to imagine how you could justify Peja having his retired...
And here it comes...
buddahead_916 said:Well actually no, I don't think Peja should have his number retired. I wasn't in fact comparing his impact to Webber's or anything of that nature. In the unlikely event Peja finishes his career in Sac he possibly will have his number retired, but the point is that by saying what I said, I wish we didn't have to talk about retiring his number because he'd still be here.
kperica said:Yes, they should.
I hope they're pretty generous with the number retiring for "the golden age" - Webber, Vlade, Peja, Bibby. Although it might suck to be a kings player 10 years from now and have to wear 82 cause all the good numbers are taken.
Bricklayer said:Webb will be automatic. I can only assume that Vlade is nearly so, even though its not a statistical thing with him. Suspect that that's it at the moment, and any others will depend on who stays and for how long. Doug played his heart out, but was only here for 4 years. Mike hasn't been here long enough yet, but could see it one day. Peja is a borderline case right now if he leaves this summer. Really no higher than the #3 most likely of the guys from the golden era, and you know they can't retire EVERYBODY's numbers, or they really would run out of numbers (they will eventaulyl anyway -- wonder what happens then? #173?).
gilly420 said:im on the fence but lean towards retiring #4.
the arguements against it would be not enough years on the kings (semi-legit), hurt to much (pretty legit), and too much off the court stuff (not very legit).
arguements for are obvious, he was the mvp of the best 4 or 5 seasons in Sacramento Kings history
kperica said:Yes, they should.
I hope they're pretty generous with the number retiring for "the golden age" - Webber, Vlade, Peja, Bibby. Although it might suck to be a kings player 10 years from now and have to wear 82 cause all the good numbers are taken.
gilly420 said:I would not retire Vlade's jersey. No way.