Bricklayer said:Perhaps. But for who again?
[B]Sacramento trades:[/B] PG Bobby Jackson (11.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 2.3 apg in 21.7 minutes)
SF Erik Daniels (0.7 ppg, 1.1 rpg, 0.2 apg in 4.0 minutes)
[B]Sacramento receives:[/B] PG Mo Williams (8.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 27.3 minutes)
PF Marcus Fizer (5.9 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 17.2 minutes)
C Dan Gadzuric (5.9 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.8 minutes)
[B]Change in team outlook:[/B] +8.0 ppg, +9.5 rpg, and +5.7 apg.
[B]Milwaukee trades:[/B] PG Mo Williams (8.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 27.3 minutes)
PF Marcus Fizer (5.9 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 17.2 minutes)
C Dan Gadzuric (5.9 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.8 minutes)
[B]Milwaukee receives:[/B] PG Bobby Jackson (11.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 2.3 apg in 21.7 minutes)
SF Erik Daniels (0.7 ppg, 1.1 rpg, 0.2 apg in 4.0 minutes)
[B]Change in team outlook:[/B] [COLOR=Red]-8.0[/COLOR] ppg, [COLOR=Red]-9.5[/COLOR] rpg, and [COLOR=Red]-5.7[/COLOR] apg.
[COLOR=Lime][B]TRADE ACCEPTED[/B][/COLOR]
Eh, I blame Fantasy Basketball; I've been trade-happy lately.Bricklayer said:Not sure where the idea came from though that we needed to replace Tag...
Mr. S£im Citrus said:Eh, I blame Fantasy Basketball; I've been trade-happy lately.![]()
I don't need a reason to make trades; I won a league last season where, over the course of the season, I traded every player that I drafted, except for two... I have a nasty habit in fantasy basketball of trading just for the hell of it; whenever the mood strikes me. In fact, I'm in a league with some friends of mine, where my goal is to trade every single player that I drafted; so far, I've already traded all but three of my players, and I still have a team that's good enough to win the championship.Bricklayer said:Well some of us are kind of sitting pretty in our leagues and don't really need any trades.![]()
2 roumers:Geoff said:I'd say no based on the positions he plays. We're pretty good on the PF and C positions right now, we need either a PG or another swingman.
Any news on Jim Jackson?
Mr. S£im Citrus said:We'd have to do it around the trade deadline; Hughes will be a free agent:
Sacramento trades: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Sacramento receives: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +12.7 ppg, +0.3 rpg, and -0.1 apg.
Washington trades: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Washington receives: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Change in team outlook: -12.7 ppg, -0.3 rpg, and +0.1 apg.
TRADE ACCEPTED
Although... I can't imagine why Washington would possibly want to do this trade... unless... they didn't think that they could re-sign Hughes next season.
Bricklayer said:Perhaps. But for who again?
Not sure where the idea came from though that we needed to replace Tag. Tag is NOT the problem. He can get it done in our weak areas if he's just on the floor. He's been to the big dance before. Twice actually. Not a kid. not an unproven guy. Big ole shotblocking and rebounding lug. Unless some other player can match his productivity while simultaneouosly stealing minutes from either Webb or Miller, its not going to help us.
Mentioned this before -- the biggest key might actually be Tag vs. Darius. I think Darius is a handy player to have around. I also think that if he keeps Tag off the floor that Darius may actually end up hurting our chances in the end. No a player in the NBA remotely intimidated by a Miller/Webber/Songaila frontcourt. Heck I wouldn't be intimidated by a Miller/Webber/Songaila frontcourt.
Geoff said:I'd say no based on the positions he plays. We're pretty good on the PF and C positions right now, we need either a PG or another swingman.
Any news on Jim Jackson?
KMart23 said:i was actualy mentioning this because chris isn't like the chris of 2000-2003
i wouldn't give up anybody good for brown tho.