should the kings make a run at kwame brown

I think Gadzuric went on the injured list. I have him on one of my fantasy teams, which pretty much dooms him to ignonimy, or at the least a footnote question on a trivia program some time in the future. :(
 
Okay, never mind. I checked and he's not on the injured list although he's missed games recently because of injury.
 
Hey did you guys see Kwame had 0 points and a whopping 5 min played!(while his team dropped Seattle like 3rd period French!) His coach sure has a lot of faith in him and/or need for him... Zero points, at least he's still improving!
 
Bricklayer said:
Perhaps. But for who again?
Code:
[B]Sacramento trades:[/B]  PG Bobby Jackson (11.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 2.3 apg in 21.7 minutes)  
  SF Erik Daniels (0.7 ppg, 1.1 rpg, 0.2 apg in 4.0 minutes)  
[B]Sacramento receives:[/B]  PG Mo Williams (8.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 27.3 minutes)  
  PF Marcus Fizer (5.9 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 17.2 minutes)  
  C Dan Gadzuric (5.9 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.8 minutes)  
[B]Change in team outlook:[/B] +8.0 ppg, +9.5 rpg, and +5.7 apg. 

[B]Milwaukee trades:[/B]  PG Mo Williams (8.8 ppg, 3.5 rpg, 6.1 apg in 27.3 minutes)  
  PF Marcus Fizer (5.9 ppg, 2.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 17.2 minutes)  
  C Dan Gadzuric (5.9 ppg, 7.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.8 minutes)  
[B]Milwaukee receives:[/B]  PG Bobby Jackson (11.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 2.3 apg in 21.7 minutes)  
  SF Erik Daniels (0.7 ppg, 1.1 rpg, 0.2 apg in 4.0 minutes)  
[B]Change in team outlook:[/B] [COLOR=Red]-8.0[/COLOR] ppg, [COLOR=Red]-9.5[/COLOR] rpg, and [COLOR=Red]-5.7[/COLOR] apg. 

[COLOR=Lime][B]TRADE ACCEPTED[/B][/COLOR]
We'd probably have to wait until the end of the season on that one, though.

Bricklayer said:
Not sure where the idea came from though that we needed to replace Tag...
Eh, I blame Fantasy Basketball; I've been trade-happy lately. :o
 
Mr. S£im Citrus said:
Eh, I blame Fantasy Basketball; I've been trade-happy lately. :o

Well some of us are kind of sitting pretty in our leagues and don't really need any trades. ;)


As for that trade there...certainly would not help us this playoffs. And in the offseason I would much rather try to bundle Bobby to bring back a true talent of some sort if it turns out we are going to be rebuilding.

I've actually though Gadzuric was being underused in Milwaulkee for a while, but he's certianly no future star, nor worth one.
 
I don't think any team would take an injured player.... which is why I assume u said we would have to wait til the end of the season.
 
Bricklayer said:
Well some of us are kind of sitting pretty in our leagues and don't really need any trades. ;)
I don't need a reason to make trades; I won a league last season where, over the course of the season, I traded every player that I drafted, except for two... I have a nasty habit in fantasy basketball of trading just for the hell of it; whenever the mood strikes me. In fact, I'm in a league with some friends of mine, where my goal is to trade every single player that I drafted; so far, I've already traded all but three of my players, and I still have a team that's good enough to win the championship.

Sitting pretty don't mean a thing; in one of the leagues I was in, I held a stranglehold on first place from start to finish, and lost in the second round of the playoffs. In another league, I barely even made the playoffs (on a tiebreak), and won the whole damned thing; all you need is a team that's good enough to win, and a lucky draw.

Now, as for my trade proposal... I think that it could possibly be addition by subtraction: we get a proven shotblocker, and a legit backup PG that can provide energy. And Bobby gets the chance to start for a (borderline) playoff team. Everybody wins.
 
Here's an interesting trade proposal...

We'd have to do it around the trade deadline; Hughes will be a free agent:



Sacramento trades: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Sacramento receives: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +12.7 ppg, +0.3 rpg, and -0.1 apg.

Washington trades: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Washington receives: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Change in team outlook: -12.7 ppg, -0.3 rpg, and +0.1 apg.

TRADE ACCEPTED



Although... I can't imagine why Washington would possibly want to do this trade... unless... they didn't think that they could re-sign Hughes next season.




 
I'd say no based on the positions he plays. We're pretty good on the PF and C positions right now, we need either a PG or another swingman.

Any news on Jim Jackson?
 
Geoff said:
I'd say no based on the positions he plays. We're pretty good on the PF and C positions right now, we need either a PG or another swingman.

Any news on Jim Jackson?
2 roumers:
(1) He wants to be traded to Minny
(2) The team is trying to trade him to Miami
both could be true
 
Mr. S£im Citrus said:
We'd have to do it around the trade deadline; Hughes will be a free agent:



Sacramento trades: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Sacramento receives: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +12.7 ppg, +0.3 rpg, and -0.1 apg.

Washington trades: PF Kwame Brown(6.0 ppg, 3.7 rpg, 0.9 apg in 16.7 minutes) SG Larry Hughes(20.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg, 5.0 apg in 36.5 minutes)
Washington receives: SG Maurice Evans(5.0 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 0.6 apg in 13.2 minutes) C Greg Ostertag(1.8 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.2 minutes) SG Doug Christie(7.2 ppg, 3.9 rpg, 4.8 apg in 32.1 minutes)
Change in team outlook: -12.7 ppg, -0.3 rpg, and +0.1 apg.

TRADE ACCEPTED



Although... I can't imagine why Washington would possibly want to do this trade... unless... they didn't think that they could re-sign Hughes next season.





I wouldn't mind signing Hughes next season.
 
Bricklayer said:
Perhaps. But for who again?

Not sure where the idea came from though that we needed to replace Tag. Tag is NOT the problem. He can get it done in our weak areas if he's just on the floor. He's been to the big dance before. Twice actually. Not a kid. not an unproven guy. Big ole shotblocking and rebounding lug. Unless some other player can match his productivity while simultaneouosly stealing minutes from either Webb or Miller, its not going to help us.

Mentioned this before -- the biggest key might actually be Tag vs. Darius. I think Darius is a handy player to have around. I also think that if he keeps Tag off the floor that Darius may actually end up hurting our chances in the end. No a player in the NBA remotely intimidated by a Miller/Webber/Songaila frontcourt. Heck I wouldn't be intimidated by a Miller/Webber/Songaila frontcourt.

The point about Tag vs. Songaila is right on, imho. I much prefer to trade Songaila than Tag at this point, and if there would be any reason the Wiz would make a trade involving Brown and Songaila and a few other throwaways, I'm sure Petrie would listen.

The only problem I could foresee (and the chances of it occurring are minimal at best) would be Kwame breaking out of his funk, so to speak, and then just being horribly unhappy here in Sac because he's stuck on the bench for large portions of time. Let's face it -- no matter how well he does, he's not cracking into the starting lineup, which, from the sounds of that Insider article by Chad Ford (I know, I know, consider the source), Kwame thinks he should be starting for someone.
 
Geoff said:
I'd say no based on the positions he plays. We're pretty good on the PF and C positions right now, we need either a PG or another swingman.

Any news on Jim Jackson?


i was actualy mentioning this because chris isn't like the chris of 2000-2003 :(
i wouldn't give up anybody good for brown tho.
 
KMart23 said:
i was actualy mentioning this because chris isn't like the chris of 2000-2003 :(
i wouldn't give up anybody good for brown tho.

Oh, geez. Another of the "Chris isn't like the Chris of 2000-2003" comments? When are people going to give up on that tired and irrelevant refrain?

No, Webber isn't the same as he was in 2000-2003. Neither is any other player. They change, mature, etc. even without injuries, surgeries, etc.

Webber has an occasional bad game. That is so blown out of proportion that some people want to use it to claim he's no longer one of the elite PFs in the league. And that is simply NOT true.
 
Back
Top