secondhand smoke kills waitress

AleksandarN

Starter
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23075001/?GT1=10856

A woman in her late teens died from an acute asthma attack triggered by secondhand cigarette smoke shortly after arriving at her job as a waitress in a bar in Michigan, researchers reported on Friday.
They said it was the first reported case of an immediate death caused by secondhand smoke.
“She didn’t have any other possible known causes of death,” said Dr. Kenneth Rosenman, a Michigan State University professor who oversees three state public health surveillance systems.


Cigarette smoke is known to trigger acute asthma attacks.
“We know that particulate levels from secondhand cigarette smoke in bars like this reach sufficient levels to set off an asthma attack,” Rosenman said.
He said the woman was a student who had a job at a fast-food restaurant, and worked a second job as a waitress at the bar. “She was perfectly fine when she went to work,” Rosenman said in a telephone interview.
“After about 15 minutes, she had an acute asthma attack and collapsed on the floor. The autopsy clearly indicates she died from asthma,” said Rosenman, who would not disclose the woman’s name or the precise place and time of her death for privacy reasons.
Rosenman said the woman had asthma since age 2. Her asthma was poorly controlled. She had made four visits to her doctor in the year before her death for flare-ups, and had been treated in a hospital emergency department two to three times that year.
Although she had prescriptions for an assortment of drugs to prevent and treat asthma attacks, she was reported to only use them when she was having breathing difficulty.
On the evening of her death, she had no inhaler with her. When she became sick, she told the bar manager she needed to go to the hospital, then collapsed on the dance floor.
Bar patrons offered an inhaler and the woman tried to use it, but could not. Emergency response workers were unable to revive her and she died shortly thereafter.
Rosenman, who wrote about the case in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine, said 24 U.S. states prohibit smoking in public places such as bars. A number of other states, including Michigan, are considering it.




He said a smoking ban could prevent future deaths.
Secondhand smoke causes about 3,400 lung cancer deaths and 46,000 heart disease deaths in adult non-smokers in the United States each year, according to the American Lung Association.
“There are a lot of statistics out there about secondhand smoke. Here is a human face. She died acutely. It is a tragic death,” Rosenman said.
The study was funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
 
She died from an acute asthma attack that could just have easily been triggered by smoke from a campfire or fireplace, etc.

Her asthma was poorly controlled...

Although she had prescriptions for an assortment of drugs to prevent and treat asthma attacks, she was reported to only use them when she was having breathing difficulty.

Sorry, but using this case as a reason to ban smoking in bars is ludicrous. I can't wait to see the lawsuit her family will inevitably file...

On the evening of her death, she had no inhaler with her.

Okay, it may sound cold but this woman died of her own stupidity.
 
Okay, it may sound cold but this woman died of her own stupidity.

thats the case with a lot of deaths and killings.


I disagree with a smoking ban for the same reasons I disagree with ANY other type of ban, and that is it is censorship. I think in America, we have all the right to disagree and make a huge deal out of stuff like this, but as US citizens we should not be in any sort of position to tell other people what they can or can not do. There is a fine line with that also.
 
My thought is that if tobacco smoke is, in fact, so lethal the government should quit dancing around and make tobacco consumption by any kind illegal AND quit subsidizing it. They aren't going to do that, however, because of the vast lobbies and amount of revenue garnered from the companies involved. So Americans are stuck in the middle - consuming something perfectly legal and dying from it.

But this is getting into a political vein so I'll stop.

:)

NOTE: And this is from someone who smoked for nearly 40 years. I quit when I finally decided there was simply too much evidence to indicate the dangers of continuing. Now if someone else is smoking, that's still their business. I can choose to be around them or not - but I don't expect government to step in and forbid them from making their own decisions.
 
My opinion is that if a state or city has banned smoking in every other workplace in the state/city then it needs to ban it in bars and restaurants too. Why don't waiters, waitresses, and bartenders deserve the same health protections that other employees do?
 
My opinion is that if a state or city has banned smoking in every other workplace in the state/city then it needs to ban it in bars and restaurants too. Why don't waiters, waitresses, and bartenders deserve the same health protections that other employees do?


The ban is already up here. It is nice to eat and work without smoke in your face.
 
My opinion is that if a state or city has banned smoking in every other workplace in the state/city then it needs to ban it in bars and restaurants too. Why don't waiters, waitresses, and bartenders deserve the same health protections that other employees do?

No problem with that. BUT I think employees still bear some personal responsibility for their actions. She had asthma - bad asthma - and yet CHOSE not to take her medications and CHOSE not to have an inhaler with her (which is so beyond stupid as to be almost unbelievable). Why shouldn't she be held at least partially responsible?
 
No problem with that. BUT I think employees still bear some personal responsibility for their actions. She had asthma - bad asthma - and yet CHOSE not to take her medications and CHOSE not to have an inhaler with her (which is so beyond stupid as to be almost unbelievable). Why shouldn't she be held at least partially responsible?
I actually agree with that. In this case I'd say she was primarily responsible for her own demise since she was aware of her condition and would be firmly opposed to any legal action by her family. I was just speaking in general, having grown up in both of my parents' restaurants I have a lot of empathy for food service workers. I'm also very proud to say that my mom lead the way on this issue when she made her restaurant 100% non-smoking in the early 90s when it still defied the conventional logic of the times.
 
Back
Top