Sac/Mia/Cle

[Dime Dropper]

Bored time, so decided to give it a go. First sight, looks like Sactown get robbed. But look to the future to see the benefits. This trade (like all the others posted) will never happen, anyway.


Sacramento Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: -11.4 ppg, +7.8 rpg, and -1.1 apg.

Incoming Players

Eric Snow
6-3 PG from Michigan State
4.2 ppg, 2.3 rpg, 4.0 apg in 23.5 minutes


Dorell Wright
6-8 SF from Leuzinger (HS)
6.0 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.4 apg in 19.6 minutes

Michael Doleac
6-11 C from Utah
3.6 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.4 apg in 12.5 minutes


Udonis Haslem
6-8 PF from Florida
10.7 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 1.2 apg in 31.5 minutes


'08 First rounder



Outgoing Players

Ron Artest
6-7 SF from St. John's
18.8 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 3.4 apg in 37.7 minutes

Mike Bibby
6-2 PG from Arizona
17.1 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 4.7 apg in 34.0 minutes



Cleveland Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +1.8 ppg, -7.6 rpg, and -0.4 apg.

Incoming Players Mike Bibby
6-2 PG from Arizona
17.1 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 4.7 apg in 34.0 minutes Outgoing Players

Drew Gooden
6-9 PF from Kansas
11.1 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.1 apg in 28.0 minutes



Eric Snow
6-3 PG from Michigan State
4.2 ppg, 2.3 rpg, 4.0 apg in 23.5 minutes



Miami Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +9.6 ppg, -0.2 rpg, and +1.5 apg.

Incoming Players

Ron Artest
6-7 SF from St. John's
18.8 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 3.4 apg in 37.7 minutes

Drew Gooden
6-9 PF from Kansas
11.1 ppg, 8.5 rpg, 1.1 apg in 28.0 minutes


Outgoing Players
Dorell Wright
6-8 SF from Leuzinger (HS)
6.0 ppg, 4.1 rpg, 1.4 apg in 19.6 minutes


Michael Doleac
6-11 C from Utah
3.6 ppg, 2.8 rpg, 0.4 apg in 12.5 minutes


Udonis Haslem
6-8 PF from Florida
10.7 ppg, 8.3 rpg, 1.2 apg in 31.5 minutes

2008 First round pick




The whys:

For Kings: Gets rid of a large contract (Mike) and Ron, who we've also been looking into trading. We get back an ender (Doleac), a good young player (Wright), a future 1st rounder, Haslem and Snow (nice ender after one season).

Why not: Gets rid of 2 of our best players without getting an impact player back. Will help for next years lottery (!). Get some bad contracts (Haslem) and Snows also isn't great.


Why for Cle: Gets Mike to pair with Lebron, but I really amn't sure they'd give up Gooden and Snow to get him, seeing as these two teams have had trouble getting a deal done when we supposedly want Gooden. Would have thrown in Gibson but that would make it a likely no-dealer for Cle.

Why not for Cle: Gets weaker up front, Gooden isn't a softie despite what people think, he can board and has a nice outside touch. No depth (Varejao would have to start).


Why for Miami: They make out like bandits! They come away with the two players that will get them right back in the title race, an upgrade over Haslem and an impact player and defensive specialist at SF, while only giving up Haslem, a youngster and a pick (Doleac is merely an ender).

Why not: They'd be stupid not to.








Overall, unrealistic trade but I'd nothing better to do!

 

[Heuge]

not enough

 

[beb0p]

I don't think Cleveland will ever trade Gooden to one of their biggest competitors in the east. And I think Petrie wants Gooden and not Haslem.

But I'm fine with this trade; although I think we can get more from an underperforming and panicing team in mid-season.

 

[91sickness]

I agree with beb0p, I think we might as well keep bibby n artest for now. Let them play n get their value up and look trade midseason when a team becomes desperate and willing to give up a little more for them.

 

[Smills91]

This deal is AWFUL for Sacramento. We're MUCH better off with the status quo than looking at completely retarded options like this.

 

[Dime Dropper]

This deal is AWFUL for Sacramento. We're MUCH better off with the status quo than looking at completely retarded options like this.

Says the poster who commented that last year the Hornets would have considered trading Chandler for Miller


You clearly have no insight towards the future and you don't know what rebuilding is. Enders, young players and picks are all we should want for the Kings via trade. Ridding ourselves of Mike and Ron would also let the kids play alot more. My scenario is much more realistic than the majority of proposals posted on here, including yours.

 

[allrightythen]

Says the poster who commented that last year the Hornets would have considered trading Chandler for Miller


You clearly have no insight towards the future and you don't know what rebuilding is. Enders, young players and picks are all we should want for the Kings via trade. Ridding ourselves of Mike and Ron would also let the kids play alot more. My scenario is much more realistic than the majority of proposals posted on here, including yours.

Haslems contract is very similar to Kenny Thomas. It would NOT help towards rebuilding. Take him out and put in someone else and I would agree with you. Although this would be forced rebuilding.