VF21 said:There is room for a lot of discussion about coaching, but I personally am not going to vote because the choices are much too simplistic for the topic at hand.
VF21 said:Define "good"...
Sorry but the whole issue of Rick Adelman as coach is much more complex than whether or not he's a good coach.
He's in the last year of his contract so, barring a miracle of some sort (translation: Kings win the championship), he will most likely NOT be the coach next year.
There is room for a lot of discussion about coaching, but I personally am not going to vote because the choices are much too simplistic for the topic at hand.
P.S. And just for the record? A lot of us around here AREN'T guys.
VF21 said:Define "good"...
Sorry but the whole issue of Rick Adelman as coach is much more complex than whether or not he's a good coach.
He's in the last year of his contract so, barring a miracle of some sort (translation: Kings win the championship), he will most likely NOT be the coach next year.
There is room for a lot of discussion about coaching, but I personally am not going to vote because the choices are much too simplistic for the topic at hand.
P.S. And just for the record? A lot of us around here AREN'T guys.
piksi said:Not again![]()
PejaHoops16 said:Sorry VF,
When I think of guys it usually means everyone.
bdouble013 said:Stop the presses! I agree with piksi!
Really, this thread looks very familiar.
VF21 said:P.S. And just for the record? A lot of us around here AREN'T guys.
piksi said:why not ?
loopymitch said:
If you want me to explain it to you I can send you a pm
piksi said:Glad, You are doing better. Nice to "see" You again.
My question was rethorical. I figured that the thread is so lame that the question fit in perfectly.
VF21 said:P.S. And just for the record? A lot of us around here AREN'T guys.