i gave a listen, and i wouldn't say petrie "took a shot at the new owners." i may be reading too much into it, but i do think he was projecting a bit. he won't ever say so, publicly, but i imagine he has some really complicated feelings about the maloofs. they were 100% on board during the glory days. they opened up their check books, they treated GP like family, and they helped give him the best stretch of his career. that said, he has to harbor at least some resentment for the way the maloofs helped to torch his reputation beyond those glory days...
despite the maloofs' terrible stewardship of the franchise in the last seven years, i'm not one who absolves GP of all culpability. that said, i'm also sensitive to the fact that he very clearly was not operating with owners who were committed to building a winning team, and it has reflected very poorly on his resume. in a league of "what have you done for me lately," petrie's recent work will not earn him the kind of position or regard that he enjoyed in sacramento for so many years, should he decide to pursue further opportunities. the same goes for his son and the rest of his staff...
though it was a small barb aimed at new ownership, it might as well have been aimed at the maloofs, who were cause for the poor record of the kings' previous front office. however, even with a stellar record of success, there were never any guarantees that anybody would have been retained. it's the hazard of the job, and, while petrie knows it, i'm also quite certain he doesn't hold a black-and-white feeling about it. i can't imagine working for the maloofs is anything but complex, and i can't imagine what his private thoughts might actually be regarding the circumstances surrounding his ouster...