Pacers want to talk to Artest; Stojakovic 'disrespected'

#31
Matt Barns knew his from his (former) teammates.

BigWaxer said:
If you listen to past players they have been treated the same. I think I remember Webb getting a heads up (not sure) but I remember Pollard saying the same thing. That nobody told him that he was being traded, he heard it from the radio.
 
#32
I rarely get headaches but I seriously just went and bought some advil a minute ago. My friggin' head is pounding from this ride today.
 
#33
bench_blob said:
I am not clear on HOW Peja was disrespected?

Just because he FEELS disrespected does not make it so.

The first priority from the standpoint of the organization is to consummate the deal. I think when it comes to trades over the years that the Kings, Geoff Petrie in particular, tries to be as discretionary and sensitive as possible to a players' feelings.

The media and rumors and leaks from insiders can take on a life of their own with the way at which news, real or not, can spread like wildfire. The Kings cannot be held accountable for that.
he was disrespected because he knew about the trade back out from TV (i think)
 
#35
I don't think Pedja should have had to hear about anything thru the media. (I think it was the stop to the deal he heard on TV, too.) I just don't think that was respectful. However, there have been other Kings players that have heard from other than the coach, GM or Maloofs. Adelman was asked to go to Webber's hotel room to tell him. I think they could have done that for Pedja. I understand the idea of not telling players everytime a trade is being discussed. Why put them on the rollercoaster everytime nothing happens.
 
#36
Peja knew it was coming. It was one of the most talked rumors of the year. I think he felt more so rejected than disrespected.

I can't blame the Kings for this because I 'm 100% sure that if it was up to GP this deal would not have been leaked to media until ink was dry and Ron's jersey ready with a number printed on it.
 
#37
I also think that they are even willing to talk to Artest is horrible. Are they talking to Peja as well? I am not a Peja Homer, but come on. He deserves better than this.
 
#38
chelle said:
I also think that they are even willing to talk to Artest is horrible. Are they talking to Peja as well? I am not a Peja Homer, but come on. He deserves better than this.
I think since artest is clearly nuts, peja should hold more importance over him, if i was GP i would see if they were to keep peja, at least find out if he would play or if now he wants to be traded. I mean for all we know, Peja was happy about this trade and now is upset because he has to stay, i dont know but i agree, they need to talk to peja as well.
 
#40
^ yep

they're willing to talk to artest? how about peja?

jeez. so artest doesn't want to come here? then i don't want him here.

the person being professional about this is just being ignored and treated unprofessionally while the jerk is getting all the attention plus is being pleased.

:|
 
#41
So we end up with Artest, who said that he would not be happy here. If he is not going to be happy, do we really think that he is going to be helpful? Some players can be great while being unhappy with the team he is on, I do not think that Artest is one of those men.

Everyone keeps saying that we are going to lose Peja for nothing if this trade does not happen. We will be losing Peja for nothing of Artest decides to lose his mind again while here or be generally unproductive. If he does not work out here, he will have LESS value than Peja. It took this long for Indiana to get a deal done. We think that we could do better - how?
 
#42
Yeah, that really gripes me. The Maloofs will fly to IND to talk to Artest, but they can't even have some flunky keep Pedja informed? That is BS. Really classless. I don't know about them, but I would not treat"family" like that in a million years. Heck, I wouldn't treat anybody that way.
 
#44
chelle said:
So we end up with Artest, who said that he would not be happy here. If he is not going to be happy, do we really think that he is going to be helpful? Some players can be great while being unhappy with the team he is on, I do not think that Artest is one of those men.

Everyone keeps saying that we are going to lose Peja for nothing if this trade does not happen. We will be losing Peja for nothing of Artest decides to lose his mind again while here or be generally unproductive. If he does not work out here, he will have LESS value than Peja. It took this long for Indiana to get a deal done. We think that we could do better - how?
I'm with you, Chelle.
 
#45
nbrans said:
This trade basically has to happen now for both sides. The Pacers aren't getting a better deal than this. And if it doesn't happen, Peja's trade value is going to be lower than nil now that he's unhappy and feels disrespected by the organization. Teams will just wait for him to walk in the offseason, or they'll lowball the Kings so hard they'll get worse than junk in return. It's either Artest or nothing at this point.
Yes, this is basically the case.
 
#46
startingtohurt said:
imagine if we rejected the cwebb trade after finding out he didnt want to report to the team...
So true. Artest is a headcase, and probably always will be, but I don't really care who they are off the court as long as he produces on the court.

And if he doesn't want to be here it would give him more incentive to produce (he's always played with intensity) to up his value to be picked up by a team "he wants."
 
#47
chelle said:
So we end up with Artest, who said that he would not be happy here. If he is not going to be happy, do we really think that he is going to be helpful? Some players can be great while being unhappy with the team he is on, I do not think that Artest is one of those men.

Everyone keeps saying that we are going to lose Peja for nothing if this trade does not happen. We will be losing Peja for nothing of Artest decides to lose his mind again while here or be generally unproductive. If he does not work out here, he will have LESS value than Peja. It took this long for Indiana to get a deal done. We think that we could do better - how?
We have a longer time frame to get something done compared to Indy (they’re trying to move on from the Artest saga and save their season) and compared to our time with Peja. And there is no telling that other players weren't offered for Artest, but just didn't fit Indy's criteria, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t fit ours.
 
#48
SacTownKing4Life said:
So true. Artest is a headcase, and probably always will be, but I don't really care who they are off the court as long as he produces on the court.

And if he doesn't want to be here it would give him more incentive to produce (he's always played with intensity) to up his value to be picked up by a team "he wants."
Well, here is the thing. Artest really hasn't had all that many off the court issues. Mostly all of them involve on the court problems. He isn't a guy thats out getting high and robbing banks on the weekend. He just likes to beat up fans once and awhile. ;)
 
#49
SacTownKid said:
Well, here is the thing. Artest really hasn't had all that many off the court issues. Mostly all of them involve on the court problems. He isn't a guy thats out getting high and robbing banks on the weekend. He just likes to beat up fans once and awhile. ;)
Well beating up fans isn't ON the court its OFF the court technically ;)
 
#50
chelle said:
So we end up with Artest, who said that he would not be happy here. If he is not going to be happy, do we really think that he is going to be helpful? Some players can be great while being unhappy with the team he is on, I do not think that Artest is one of those men.

Everyone keeps saying that we are going to lose Peja for nothing if this trade does not happen. We will be losing Peja for nothing of Artest decides to lose his mind again while here or be generally unproductive. If he does not work out here, he will have LESS value than Peja. It took this long for Indiana to get a deal done. We think that we could do better - how?
The only reason it took this long is because they had to consider ALL the offers they've had, and see what they reall wanted to do. Also, Bird decided he didn't wanted a 1 for 1 trade. Just like TO there will always be someone who wants him. He's that talented.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#51
startingtohurt said:
imagine if we rejected the cwebb trade after finding out he didnt want to report to the team...
There is NO comparison. This isn't about Webber, whose initial reaction to coming to a perpetual cellar-dwelling team better known as the graveyard of the NBA was less than enthusiastic.

This is about Ron Artest, a player who has poisoned a good team and left them in shambles, saying HE doesn't want to play for a team that has consistently won 50+ games recently, has fans who sell out the arena every night, is known to be willing to give black sheep second chances, etc.

It is NOT about Chris Webber and I find it totally deplorable that you would even try to make that comparison.
 
#52
SacTownKing4Life said:
So true. Artest is a headcase, and probably always will be, but I don't really care who they are off the court as long as he produces on the court.

And if he doesn't want to be here it would give him more incentive to produce (he's always played with intensity) to up his value to be picked up by a team "he wants."
His problems have definitely been "on the job". And he certainly hasn't seemed to concerned with his "value" up to now, having caused problems with Chicago and Indiana. So this will change how?
 
#53
VF21 said:
There is NO comparison. This isn't about Webber, whose initial reaction to coming to a perpetual cellar-dwelling team better known as the graveyard of the NBA was less than enthusiastic.

This is about Ron Artest, a player who has poisoned a good team and left them in shambles, saying HE doesn't want to play for a team that has consistently won 50+ games recently, has fans who sell out the arena every night, is known to be willing to give black sheep second chances, etc.

It is NOT about Chris Webber and I find it totally deplorable that you would even try to make that comparison.
I find that a ridiculous comparison too. Absolutely no commonality there.
 
#54
kennadog said:
His problems have definitely been "on the job". And he certainly hasn't seemed to concerned with his "value" up to now, having caused problems with Chicago and Indiana. So this will change how?
There is not guarntees in this game or any game for that matter. It's all about taking chances, we've seen it numerous times with other people (Webber is the first comes to mind, got himself traded from GS/WA. Another Randy Moss this year we didn't hear a WORD from him.)

We need to take a chance, Peja was more than likely not going to stay with us, he hasn't played good/consistant basketball in quite a while, getting in my opinion a top 20 player in the league when he is ON the court playing for an inconsistant shooter is a GREAT deal for us.
 
#55
I'm not the only one that see the comparison of Cwebb and Artest trade. It was mentioned on air and even Kozimor said yeah isn't that kind of strange on how they resemble eachother, or something to that effect.
 
#56
I think Peja is just being a big baby like he always is. As I remember, it was he who requested a trade out of Sacramento first. I think the media breaks these things before anything is confirmed and that is not our fault.
 
#57
VF21 said:
There is NO comparison. This isn't about Webber, whose initial reaction to coming to a perpetual cellar-dwelling team better known as the graveyard of the NBA was less than enthusiastic.

This is about Ron Artest, a player who has poisoned a good team and left them in shambles, saying HE doesn't want to play for a team that has consistently won 50+ games recently, has fans who sell out the arena every night, is known to be willing to give black sheep second chances, etc.

It is NOT about Chris Webber and I find it totally deplorable that you would even try to make that comparison.
Sacramento has never really been a desirable place for "top-end" players to come to. We're not the "huge" stage that players can get mass media to them we probably never will be. And now (not the past we had different teams the past few years our leader was traded last year) we're back to a "cellar-dwellar". I still think we can do well this season with a bit of a change.
 
#59
SoupIsGood said:
This is all such a mess.
exactly

this better be cleared up tomorrow or some time this week!

how can anyone expect me to do well on my midterms with all this going on????

tsk tsk tsk
 
#60
LMM said:
exactly

this better be cleared up tomorrow or some time this week!

how can anyone expect me to do well on my midterms with all this going on????

tsk tsk tsk
obviously midterms need to be cancelled... want me to call your teachers?;)