Bricklayer
Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Oh come on now. You're smart enough to recognize a certain ridiculous pattern to your suggestions I'm sure. Just silly.
Bricklayer said:Oh come on now. You're smart enough to recognize a certain ridiculous pattern to your suggestions I'm sure. Just silly.
Like who?BMiller52 said:Playmaker: Garnett actually played SF in his earlier years. He is more of a PF/SF than a PF/C. He'd have a hard time defending the stronger Cs.
BMiller52 said:Dude, Jermaine O'neal gets worn out playing C. So would Garnett, it doesn't matter if the other centers are good but as long as they bang it takes a toll on the player playing out of position. It's not going to work, if it was the TWolves wouldn't have played Olowoworthless when he was there.
BMiller52 said:Playmaker: Garnett actually played SF in his earlier years. He is more of a PF/SF than a PF/C. He'd have a hard time defending the stronger Cs.
LPKingsFan said:And for the three-team deal above, I like. But the Knicks are still hesitant to deal Frye, no?
playmaker0017 said:True.
Not that any of this conjecture really matters - since we wouldn't get KG for that ... or any other package.
I still think KG is not a fix-all, no matter who we have in our current lineup playing alongside him. He's a cap-killer.
LoungeLizard said:I have a funny feeling Garnett is going to end up on the Lakers. Maybe not this year, but the offseason perhaps. As pissed as I would be to see a Kobe/Garnett tandem, it wouldn't surprise me in the least. The league would pee their pants to see that happen. A marketing dream, and Philip would be in heaven, and I would be in hell.
Wuster said:I personally doubt Kobe's ability to co-exist with another superstar of KG's level. I don't think KG will end up there.
LPKingsFan said:KG wouldn't be alone... with Miller, Artest, SAR, Martin and Garcia...
All will be under contract through 2008.
Now I'm to think it's going to be done. But I'm also not blind as to see that it could pay huge dividends if--in spite of the one in a million chances--it went down.
atxrocker said:One in a million? Try ONE IN A BILLION.. sorry, though I would LOVE to see K.G here it will not happen.
bigbadred00 said:I don't think KG is untouchable. His contract is TERRIBLE and hurts his team.
Now I think Lebron, Wade, Dirk, Kobe, and Amare are probally the only untouchable players in the league. Dwight Howard is close company, Yao is as well. I don't think Duncan is untouchable anymore, although he's close (he's probally untouchable). I lean less towards Duncan due to his age.
I bet if you give the right offer you can get anyone on the Kings and a number of teams (especially the Knicks).
Almost noone is free from being traded in any sport given the right situation.
If we some how high balled minne (doubt we'd ever do it) offering multiple first round picks on top of some of our better players (miller and bibby for instance), I'm betting they'd give us KG. KG is much older than the players I last mentioned on top of having a salary that kills a team on top of really having not much success as he should have being arguably a top 3 player in the league.
starks said:bibby, artest, martin, thomas, for nash, diaw and k.thomas...NOW...
captain bill said:I realize you're being sarcastic about trades that won't happen, but why would you even say that? Nash is good, but you're just handing the Suns the best team in the NBA.
starks said:I'm not sarcastic...I just hate this grab/hold defence and SLOW/isolation/no movement/no fast break/selfish offence.... btw artest wouldn't be loss.... has not going to stay in sac more than year anyway
starks said:I'm not sarcastic...I just hate this grab/hold defence and SLOW/isolation/no movement/no fast break/selfish offence.... btw artest wouldn't be loss.... has not going to stay in sac more than year anyway