HMMM what I don't get is alot of ppl don't want Artest here because of all the drama. Yet some of the same ppl want Yi here???? talk about drama. and this with a guy that is UNproven on the court which Ron is.
NO THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!
You're kidding right? I'm sure that the Chinese government hasn't picked up the phone and called the Tigers front office or anything like that. Those kinds of things would never happen.![]()
HMMM what I don't get is alot of ppl don't want Artest here because of all the drama. Yet some of the same ppl want Yi here???? talk about drama. and this with a guy that is UNproven on the court which Ron is.
NO THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!
I actually see Demond more as an energetic spark off the bench...There other SF option is Bobby Simmons who actually has the same(ish) contract as Ron Ron...Enoughso to make it work under the CBA. so my idea is.
Ron Artest
For...
Bobby Simmons
Rights to Yi JianLian
I would pull the trigger on that one...Simmons isnt all that bad, and Yi is really what you want.
No, actually apparently the Tigers are technically private. But those distinctions aren't quite what they are over here and the government has been intimately involved from the start in Yi's being "permitted" to come to the NBA.
I got an idea, lets trade Artest to the Guandong Tigers for Yi. Then he can be in China and tell the chinese how much he would love to retire a Tiger.
No, actually apparently the Tigers are technically private. But those distinctions aren't quite what they are over here and the government has been intimately involved from the start in Yi's being "permitted" to come to the NBA.
PS, any chance we could pull off a:
Artest/SAR/future 1st (top 10 protected in 08, top 5 09)
for Yi/Simmons/Gadz
You cannot trade consecutive first round draft picks.
You cannot trade consecutive first round draft picks.
who has traded consecutive 1st rounders?
Oh, good question. Maybe it was the unclear way the pick mentioned above was mentioned? ("top 10 protected in 08, top 5 09")
Oh, good question. Maybe it was the unclear way the pick mentioned above was mentioned? ("top 10 protected in 08, top 5 09")
i took his quote as a future 1st rounder with protections in 08-09. nobody is foolish enough to give up 2 future 1st rounders for yi.