I didn't see a smiley so maybe ur serious with the clippers having Boozer.
Why sign Boozer who will demand max when you can have Landry at 3M from the bench backing Griffin?
If Clippers ships Gordon(who is undersized SG) for Landry (undersized PF like Boozer), then they can have a solid C-PF rotation and they can sign maybe Joe Johnson who is a legit SG. That's more worth signing than getting an overprized PF who will share the minutes of your PF who was the number 1 pick of 2009.
Anyway, Gordon just came to my mind when thinking about a SG to play with Evans since he is damn strong (even if undersized) and can shoot from almost any range. But either way, the Dalembert trade sure gave us flexibility in our front court and even for future trades.
Why sign Boozer who will demand max when you can have Landry at 3M from the bench backing Griffin?
If Clippers ships Gordon(who is undersized SG) for Landry (undersized PF like Boozer), then they can have a solid C-PF rotation and they can sign maybe Joe Johnson who is a legit SG. That's more worth signing than getting an overprized PF who will share the minutes of your PF who was the number 1 pick of 2009.
Anyway, Gordon just came to my mind when thinking about a SG to play with Evans since he is damn strong (even if undersized) and can shoot from almost any range. But either way, the Dalembert trade sure gave us flexibility in our front court and even for future trades.
Meant Gooden. THe Boozer talk in the other thread got me confised.