NBA ref being investigated by FBI?

Variant

Starter
Take with a grain of salt of course. Below is an excerpt, click link for full article.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/07202007/news/columnists/nba_in_a_fix_columnists_murray_weiss.htm

July 20, 2007 -- THE FBI is investigating an NBA referee who allegedly was betting on basketball games - including ones he was officiating during the past two seasons - as part of an organized-crime probe in the Big Apple, The Post has learned.

The investigation, which began more than a year ago, is zeroing in on blockbuster allegations that the referee was making calls that affected the point spread to guarantee that he - and the hoods who had their hooks in him - cashed in on large bets.
 
That's it!! We finally found the cause. In the 2002 playoffs the REFS were the one's that called the game so horribly, because they figured LA was going to win, but when they saw the Kings were really competing they started making the horrid calls to ensure they'd win their bet!! :D
 
Serious allegations indeed, and right to the heart of the game's integrity. Be interesting to see which, if any, of the familiar reffing names is quietly put on furlough for the opening of the season.
 
I wonder if it's Joe Crawford. Remember that he was suspended for all of last season's playoffs? Maybe it didn't have anything to do with Duncan at all.

It'll also be really interesting if it was a big name (like Crawford) who reffed NBA Finals games.

If it was one of the Game 6 refs, someone with a stronger stomach than me needs to rewatch that game and figure out if it was one ref making all the bad calls.
 
I wonder if it's Joe Crawford. Remember that he was suspended for all of last season's playoffs? Maybe it didn't have anything to do with Duncan at all.

It'll also be really interesting if it was a big name (like Crawford) who reffed NBA Finals games.

If it was one of the Game 6 refs, someone with a stronger stomach than me needs to rewatch that game and figure out if it was one ref making all the bad calls.


Well, these particular allegations at least only go back for the last two seasons. Claim the ref got into debt wiht some bookies, and this was their way of getting him paying it off or some such. Classic storyline that always amazes me still goes on. And when you are a semi-public personage like an NBA ref too...they aren't going to "disappear" you. Not sure what the threat would be. Family? Anyway, story says that he is going to surrender next week. Should be interesting.

P.S. and yeah, Crawford could seem the type, and who knows, maybe it would explain the San Antonio thing he had. But the implication is that this is a current ref, and I think he is already out. Besides which Crawford might well just tell a Mafia guy who tried to pressure him to go stick it where the sun don't shine. ;)
 
Well, these particular allegations at least only go back for the last two seasons. Claim the ref got into debt wiht some bookies, and this was their way of getting him paying it off or some such. Classic storyline that always amazes me still goes on. And when you are a semi-public personage like an NBA ref too...they aren't going to "disappear" you. Not sure what the threat would be. Family? Anyway, story says that he is going to surrender next week. Should be interesting.

P.S. and yeah, Crawford could seem the type, and who knows, maybe it would explain the San Antonio thing he had. But the implication is that this is a current ref, and I think he is already out. Besides which Crawford might well just tell a Mafia guy who tried to pressure him to go stick it where the sun don't shine. ;)

I saw that the current allegations were only for last two years, but since I believe Game 6 was rigged like I believe water is wet and Ron Artest is crazy, folks are going to have a REAL hard time convincing me the problem didn't go back that far.
 
I wonder if it's Joe Crawford. Remember that he was suspended for all of last season's playoffs? Maybe it didn't have anything to do with Duncan at all.

It'll also be really interesting if it was a big name (like Crawford) who reffed NBA Finals games.

If it was one of the Game 6 refs, someone with a stronger stomach than me needs to rewatch that game and figure out if it was one ref making all the bad calls.
My guess would be that if an official was fixing games (and I believe this was more fixing point spreads than actual games), it would more than likely be low-profile, middle of the week games, not marquee games like a Sunday afternoon Dallas vs. San Antonio game. And definitely not playoff games.
 
I wonder if it's Joe Crawford. Remember that he was suspended for all of last season's playoffs? Maybe it didn't have anything to do with Duncan at all.

Oh, good news for you... Joey is back next season per NBA TV a few days ago.

PS: Joey Crawford was one of those who was actually sentenced under the tax fraud case in the late 90s (write-off scheme based on downgrading 1st class plane tix paid for by the NBA). Joey got house arrest and probation. Stern picked him back up after that, obviously. Joey didn't even miss any games during his short resignation because it coincided w/ the offseason and the start of the lockout season.
 
Last edited:
why not, maybe there is more to it than what the fbi are talking about now. FBI really cannot prove that many of the games are fixed by the nba itself but they can get into some hard core facts like ties to the mafia to take a crack at it or maybe they didnt care until this came to a point where mafia started controlling the outcome.

There were so many games in the past few seasons (5 years or so ) where fans of both the teams winner or loser know that the referees sucked big time or decided the game even on national tv and during the playoffs. Mavs vs heat was one that drew lots of attention recently and you cant get a bigger show than that for the nba. Lakers kings was another one that drew lots of attention, whether it be the game 6 or the game 5 there were complaints all around and interestingly game 7 drew one of the highest ratings in the nba.

Whether the lakers have been down or the kings have been down after that 2002 season the lakers kings games during the season all seem to be really of great entertainment value because of the close and unnatural finishes we have seen, some of those finishes you cant wildly imagine. Was that milking the system and the fans, we dont know.

How come stu jackson the God was not able to figure out this aspect if his crew was closely monitoring the games and reviewing the game tapes, if this was happening consistently for 2 years what does it say of his job efficiency and what he was supposed to do.

I am sure there is more to it than just this one case :)
 
it would more than likely be low-profile, middle of the week games, not marquee games like a Sunday afternoon Dallas vs. San Antonio game. And definitely not playoff games.

Theres more money up when it comes to playoff games, and the stakes change by thousands of dollars. So definitely playoff games.
 
why not, maybe there is more to it than what the fbi are talking about now. FBI really cannot prove that many of the games are fixed by the nba itself but they can get into some hard core facts like ties to the mafia to take a crack at it or maybe they didnt care until this came to a point where mafia started controlling the outcome.

There were so many games in the past few seasons (5 years or so ) where fans of both the teams winner or loser know that the referees sucked big time or decided the game even on national tv and during the playoffs. Mavs vs heat was one that drew lots of attention recently and you cant get a bigger show than that for the nba. Lakers kings was another one that drew lots of attention, whether it be the game 6 or the game 5 there were complaints all around and interestingly game 7 drew one of the highest ratings in the nba.

Whether the lakers have been down or the kings have been down after that 2002 season the lakers kings games during the season all seem to be really of great entertainment value because of the close and unnatural finishes we have seen, some of those finishes you cant wildly imagine. Was that milking the system and the fans, we dont know.

How come stu jackson the God was not able to figure out this aspect if his crew was closely monitoring the games and reviewing the game tapes, if this was happening consistently for 2 years what does it say of his job efficiency and what he was supposed to do.

I am sure there is more to it than just this one case :)


Well, because I mean obviously. Classic gambling debts scenarios just aren't going to cut it. What is a conspiracy really unless it involves David Stern?

And the U.N..

And the freemasons.

And the Illuminati.
 
Theres more money up when it comes to playoff games, and the stakes change by thousands of dollars. So definitely playoff games.
It's exponentially more difficult to fix a playoff game (the best players in the League doing all they can to win) and get away with it.

Maybe I'm being naive, but I guess I'm one of the few remaining sports fans that doesn't believe that the games are fixed. I don't believe the NFL helped the Colts win a Super Bowl, I don't believe the NBA suspended Amare Stoudemire because they wanted San Antonio in the Finals again, etc.

I think common sense dictates that if you're going to shave points in a professional sports league, you do it when there's less of a risk of being figured out. Not when ratings are at their highest point of the year and everyone is paying super-close attention. You do it when no one is watching but degenerate gamblers, and you help them dig a hole so deep that they have to keep laying the spread - that you're controlling, by the way - in order to have a chance at winning some of their money back.

I just don't think you can affect the outcome of a playoff game without serious backlash. Even after Game 6 in 2002, Ralph Nader lobbied for an investigation because of the poor calls made down the stretch. People are paying more attention during the postseason, and it makes it way to hard to get away with it.

But who knows? Maybe they've been doing this for several years and been getting away with it. Maybe they've gotten so good at it that they don't care who's watching. Maybe the entire 2002 WCF was fixed from the beginning.
 
Well, because I mean obviously. Classic gambling debts scenarios just aren't going to cut it. What is a conspiracy really unless it involves David Stern?

And the U.N..

And the freemasons.

And the Illuminati.

You forgot Area 51.
 
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2943095Donaghy under investigation for betting on NBA games

ESPN.com news services




Updated: July 20, 2007, 2:30 PM



NBA referee Tim Donaghy is under investigation by the FBI for allegations that he bet on games that he officiated over the past two seasons and that he made calls affecting the point spread in games, multiple sources told ESPN.
Donaghy, a 13-year veteran of the league, is aware of the investigation and resigned from the NBA recently.
The NBA issued a brief statement Friday, saying: "We have been asked by the FBI, with whom we are working closely, not to comment on this matter at this time."
According to a law enforcement official, authorities are examining whether Donaghy -- whose identity was not revealed until Friday afternoon -- made calls to affect the point spread in games on which he or associates had wagered.
nba_g_tdonaghy_65.jpg
Donaghy

The law enforcement official, who spoke to The Associated Press on Friday on condition of anonymity, said the referee was aware of the investigation and had made arrangements to surrender as early as next week to face charges. The official, who did not identify the referee, is familiar with the investigation but was not authorized to speak publicly about the ongoing investigation.
The investigation first was reported Friday by the New York Post.
The law enforcement official said the bets involved thousands of dollars and were made on games during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 seasons.
The FBI probe, which began recently, also involves allegations that the referee had connections to organized crime associates. Other arrests are expected, the official said.
The referee had a gambling problem, according to the official, and was approached by low-level mob associates through an acquaintance.
Nevada gambling regulators were not involved in an investigation and had no information about the allegations, said Jerry Markling, enforcement chief for the state Gaming Commission and Gaming Control Board.
Jay Kornegay, executive director of the sports book at the Las Vegas Hilton, said he had never seen any unusual activity in NBA betting, and was surprised not to have heard about an investigation until Friday.
"Whispers would have happened on the street, and we would have heard something," Kornegay said. "Any type of suspicious or unusual movements, you usually hear in the industry. We're so regulated and policed, any kind of suspicion would be discussed.
"We haven't seen anything like that in the NBA that I can remember," he said, "and we haven't been contacted by anybody."
Kornegay said legal sports betting in Nevada represents a fraction of sports betting worldwide, with 98.5 percent of all action taken outside the state. Clayton cited a 2005 estimate by the National Gambling Impact Study Commission that found $380 billion is wagered on illegal sports betting, compared with $2.25 billion in legal sports betting in Nevada.
Gambling long has been a problem in sports, and leagues have made a point of educating players of the potential pitfalls. The NBA, for example, discusses gambling at rookie orientation, even bringing in former mobster Michael Franceze to speak.
NBA commissioner David Stern had long objected to putting a team in Las Vegas because it permits betting on basketball, though earlier this year allowed Mayor Oscar Goodman to submit a proposal to owners on how the city would handle wagering on a team if it moved there.
 
Well, because I mean obviously. Classic gambling debts scenarios just aren't going to cut it. What is a conspiracy really unless it involves David Stern?

And the U.N..

And the freemasons.

And the Illuminati.

so what about all the referee review policy that the nba supposedly has, arent there anonymous observers in the games who are supposed to monitor the refs and the games. Wasnt stu jackson supposed to review the tapes and look into all these matters. How come they couldnt catch this for 2 years.


NBA doesnt share its referee assignment policy for the regular games or playoffs
NBA doesnt have independent auditors auditing the assignment of the refs or the review of the referee conduct or player conduct
NBA doesnt share the findings in its supposed review with the public
NBA doesnt share the referee instructions that they send before every game, even after the season is completed.
NBA stopped instant replays of contentious calls on tv, a few years ago there were so many replays and analysis of bad calls but now very very few are shown in replays.
NBA doesnt have a clean image unlike the NFL or MLB now and thats why people dont doubt NFL or MLB to that extent.
NBA has more controversies every year than any other sport due to their arbitrary decision making process
 
Theres more money up when it comes to playoff games, and the stakes change by thousands of dollars. So definitely playoff games.

I don't see how the stakes go up as far as the bettor is concerned. You go to a sports book, you put your money down on the spread, if you win you collect. The payoffs aren't any different for the playoffs, and there's nothing to stop the bettor from putting down a lot of money on a regular season game.

If anything, the fact that the stakes are the same for the bettor in both circumstances would suggest that regular season games are preferable, because as has been mentioned, there's less scrutiny.
 
I don't see how the stakes go up as far as the bettor is concerned. You go to a sports book, you put your money down on the spread, if you win you collect. The payoffs aren't any different for the playoffs, and there's nothing to stop the bettor from putting down a lot of money on a regular season game.

If anything, the fact that the stakes are the same for the bettor in both circumstances would suggest that regular season games are preferable, because as has been mentioned, there's less scrutiny.
The stakes are not higher for the bettor... but they are MUCH higher for the house. With more action on the game the house looks to either clean up or can get cleaed out from a single game. So if you can fix those BIG games as the house you look to take more dumb schmucks to the cleaners.
 
I just don't think you can affect the outcome of a playoff game without serious backlash. Even after Game 6 in 2002, Ralph Nader lobbied for an investigation because of the poor calls made down the stretch.

Nader heard there were poor calls.
 
No one said games were thrown.
Exactly.

All that I've heard so far is that he made calls that affected the point spreads on some games he officiated. That could mean that he threw games (even though that would be a lot more visible), but it more likely means that Team A was winning but hadn't covered the spread, so a late game shot from the corner that was actually a two-pointer was ruled a three pointer, even though the shooter's foot was on the line. Or something similar.

I think it's highly unlikely that a referee could purposely influence the overall outgame of NBA games for two seasons and no one in the League notice. It would be hard enough to shave points in a blowout, much less call the game so blatantly in favor of one team that they wind up winning because of your calls.

I don't think this is a Paul Crewe type of deal.
 
I don't think this is a Paul Crewe type of deal.

I agree w/ that because of the nature of this sport.

There are some things that a ref can't get away w/ all that easily. Ruling a three a two is one of them. They usually convene and correct that particular mistake because it's relatively black or white. I've seen them correct the score an eon after they originally made that mistake.

Otoh, calling ticky tack fouls at the end of games is easy to cover up. Refs tweet when a player barely taps another guy if one team is trying to stop the clock, while earlier in the game similar light contact might be ignored. It's the variation in the styles of the refs and the variation in the way things are called based on the time remaining and based on the players' position (easy to get away w/ weak perimeter calls) that help a guy cover his tracks.

However, there ARE 2 other refs on the floor that affect the score that Donaghy is trying to stabilize. I doubt it's very easy for one guy to make enough unsuspicious calls to counteract the performance of BOTH teams and the other 2 refs. (I'm inclined to think that this may be one explanation for why he was able to do it for two years. He probably had to take some losses here and there so what he was doing wouldn't appear blatant).
 
Last edited: