MoPete Trade Proposal

[OvechKiN]

Ok, so here is a realistic trade scenario:

To Sac:
Morris Peterson


To Toronto:
Bonzi (S&T)
Salmons (since Colangelo wanted him)

 

[Bricklayer]

Ok, so here is a realistic trade scenario:

To Sac:
Morris Peterson


To Toronto:
Bonzi (S&T)
Salmons (since Colangelo wanted him)

We can't trade Salmons for some months now that we've signed him. Nor would we of course -- when's the last time a team did that?

Also sincerely doubt Tornoto wants any part of him after he bailed on them and said that God didn't want him to go there.

 

[Gary]

How the heck is this realistic when Salmons rejected ta trade to Toronto, PLUS he cannot be traded right now.. lol.

Edit-didnt see post above. Just saw his than hit reply..

 

[Big Cuz 15]

We can't trade Salmons for some months now that we've signed him. Nor would we of course -- when's the last time a team did that?

Also sincerely doubt Tornoto wants any part of him after he bailed on them and said that God didn't want him to go there.

god put a U-turn sign on the road. it's back to toronto!

 

[Packt]

Ok, so here is a realistic trade scenario:

To Sac:
Morris Peterson


To Toronto:
Bonzi (S&T)
Salmons (since Colangelo wanted him)

What would be the point anyhow? We don't get any better, Peterson is an expiring or will be, but if cap space was an issue, we'd never have signed Salmons in the first place.

 

[KingKong]

Mo Pete doesn't impress me one bit. Also do we need another SF, really?

 

[bajaden]

Ok, so here is a realistic trade scenario:

To Sac:
Morris Peterson


To Toronto:
Bonzi (S&T)
Salmons (since Colangelo wanted him)

I'm sorry, this is not even worthy of comment. Opp's I guess I just commented didn't I. Sorry.....

 

[CreeksideBaller]

NO WAY! Hopefully Petrie would never do that. I wouldn't trade Bonzi alone for that guy, he sucks!

 

[Circa_1985_Fan]

eh....um....negatory, thank you...