Maloofs would let Petrie interview for Blazers job if he wanted

BMiller52

All-Star
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/sam_amick/05/05/trail.blazers.gm/index.html

Up the coast in Sacramento, Geoff Petrie -- the Kings' president and former Blazers executive/player who has been connected to the job consistently by Portland media -- can relate. The Maloof family that owns the Kings is overloaded with debt and still faces the possibility of relocation after they backed out of an arena deal with the city that was negotiated by the NBA (although they will be in Sacramento at least through next season). The Kings have had the lowest payroll among NBA teams the last two seasons, but have posted six straight losing seasons (159-317, .334 winning percentage).
Yet despite the limitations, Petrie has played a significant part in the team's drastic decline and sources close to him say he believes his once-sterling reputation has taken a serious beating, in large part, because of the ownership situation. With one season left on his contract, there continues to be conflicting signs about his future with the team, and while co-owner Joe Maloof told SI.com on Saturday that Portland has not requested permission to speak with Petrie, he said he would allow him to pursue the opportunity if that was his wish.
"We'd love to keep him, but we aren't going to hold him back if he did get another offer," Joe Maloof said. "It's whatever he decides."

I have to say this makes me nervous. I don't think these guys will own the team much longer and I'd like to see Petrie stay on as a steady hand to guide the team through a transition. I mean a lot of these guys (Cousins, Reke, IT, Jimmer, etc) are Petrie's players and I think it'd be best if he decides what to do with them, rather than a new GM who could come in and decide that Cousins is too much of a pain to deal with, or might not evaluate Tyreke correctly, or give up on Jimmer too soon, etc. I really think that if Petrie had access to more cash he would get us more shotblocking, shooting, and a better coach, but it's hard to do well with the guys we have as owners. On the other hand, it could be a sign the Maloofs aren't going to own the team much longer and have enough respect for Geoff that they'd let him explore other options incase a future owner wants to bring in their own GM? What do you all think?
 
We might as well start planning the farewell party for Petrie. That comment from Joe Maloof is about as non-supportive as you could get. "We'd love to keep him but we aren't going to hold him back" is Maloof code for "We can't afford him anyway."

No offense to you, BMiller52, but the suggestion that the Maloofs have respect for Geoff Petrie - or anyone else on the planet - is laughable. I think they showed their total lack of even a passing acquaintance with the word "respect" when they pursued Phil Jackson while Rick Adelman was still our coach. They don't even have a hint of what "respect" is.

God, I hate the Maloofs.
 
Last edited:
We might as well start planning the farewell party for Petrie. That comment from Joe Maloof is about as non-supportive as you could get. "We'd love to keep him but we aren't going to hold him back" is Maloof code for "We can't afford him anyway."

No offense to you, BMiller52, but the suggestion that the Maloofs have respect for Geoff Petrie - or anyone else on the planet - is laughable. I think they showed their total lack of even a passing acquaintance with the word "respect" when they pursued Phil Jackson while Rick Adelman was still our coach. They don't even have a hint of what "respect" is.

God, I hate the Maloofs.

Yeah I agree with you for the most part, I just still want to be semi hopeful. It sees like they just want to take the Kings down with them as a sinking ship. It's not fair IMO. They either can't afford him or just want to run the team into the ground. Maybe both?
 
mzl.zoaejles.320x480-75.jpg
 
Perhaps they are negotiating a sale already. Perhaps the new owner wants the option of hiring his/her own employees. I don't see what's wrong with all this especially if it means the team is going to be sold.
 
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/sam_amick/05/05/trail.blazers.gm/index.html
I don't think these guys will own the team much longer and I'd like to see Petrie stay on as a steady hand to guide the team through a transition. I mean a lot of these guys (Cousins, Reke, IT, Jimmer, etc) are Petrie's players and I think it'd be best if he decides what to do with them, rather than a new GM who could come in and decide that Cousins is too much of a pain to deal with, or might not evaluate Tyreke correctly, or give up on Jimmer too soon, etc. I really think that if Petrie had access to more cash he would get us more shotblocking, shooting, and a better coach, but it's hard to do well with the guys we have as owners. On the other hand, it could be a sign the Maloofs aren't going to own the team much longer and have enough respect for Geoff that they'd let him explore other options incase a future owner wants to bring in their own GM? What do you all think?
I would rather see another GM guide the team through a transition than see Petrie mess-up the team some more. Petrie is a good talent evaluator/drafter, but that is the only thing he is good at. Also, there was also this report that he does not really work hard enough to make the Kings better and it shows on how dysfunctional the Kings organization is. I think he needs to retire because he seems burned out already.
 
Perhaps they are negotiating a sale already. Perhaps the new owner wants the option of hiring his/her own employees. I don't see what's wrong with all this especially if it means the team is going to be sold.

But all signs seem to point to the Maloofs being morons rather than them selling the team.
 
I would rather see another GM guide the team through a transition than see Petrie mess-up the team some more. Petrie is a good talent evaluator/drafter, but that is the only thing he is good at. Also, there was also this report that he does not really work hard enough to make the Kings better and it shows on how dysfunctional the Kings organization is. I think he needs to retire because he seems burned out already.

Another GM like who? Who on the Maloofs budget could make this team a success. And before you point to a certain ex-Portland GM who shall not be named, lets just remember that much of his success can be attributed to him using his owner's supreme wealth to simply buy draft picks and offer players ridiculous contracts (such as offering a massive contract to a star player with no knees).
 
Another GM like who? Who on the Maloofs budget could make this team a success. And before you point to a certain ex-Portland GM who shall not be named, lets just remember that much of his success can be attributed to him using his owner's supreme wealth to simply buy draft picks and offer players ridiculous contracts (such as offering a massive contract to a star player with no knees).

Not to mention Pritchard would probably cost a ridiculous amount of money. I can't imagine he'd be cheap, and he'd have to be REALLY cheap to fit into the Maloofs price range. Fact of the matter is we can't afford anyone better than Geoff.
 
Another GM like who? Who on the Maloofs budget could make this team a success. And before you point to a certain ex-Portland GM who shall not be named, lets just remember that much of his success can be attributed to him using his owner's supreme wealth to simply buy draft picks and offer players ridiculous contracts (such as offering a massive contract to a star player with no knees).


Hey hey! I may have my chance to GM an almost NBA team after all! I've always said I'd work cheap, and that would appear to be the Maloofs single criteria for just about any employee.
 
Hey hey! I may have my chance to GM an almost NBA team after all! I've always said I'd work cheap, and that would appear to be the Maloofs single criteria for just about any employee.

The next Kings GM will have to be willing to work for free and pay for the janitor's salary. They'll hold a contest for the most desperate fan and everything.
 
Perhaps they are negotiating a sale already. Perhaps the new owner wants the option of hiring his/her own employees. I don't see what's wrong with all this especially if it means the team is going to be sold.

More our wishful thinking that the fact.

Nothing would make me happy if the team got sold to an owner able and willing to spend the money necessary to get us to a contender status but Maloofs are pricks that are in denial and they will go down and drag everyone else down with them, including the fans of this team.

I am just hoping that there is a way that KJ and Stern/NBA can back these pricks into the corner to sell the team. I would have nothing against us having the Hornets type situation here where the NBA takes over the team and sell it to the best of owner for a tidy profit as long as the pricks are no longer owners of this team.

But if you are expecting that Maloofs are selling or negotiating with someone about the sale, well that is just wishful thinking and if they are negotiating about selling the team to someone, I would feel extremely nervous that they would shaft us off to Samueli. Luckily, the NBA need to approve the new owners before the sale becomes official.
 
Hey hey! I may have my chance to GM an almost NBA team after all! I've always said I'd work cheap, and that would appear to be the Maloofs single criteria for just about any employee.

I think they've figured out Adrian Maloof's new story arc for the next season of her reality show: being the GM of an NBA basketball team.
 
People say this team is messed up. But I have a hard time seeing it that way. I see young talent here that needs coaching and one or two more pieces. I don't know if Petrie leaving helps. Probably not. It depends who replaces him and I don't see anything good happening unfortunatly.
 
People say this team is messed up. But I have a hard time seeing it that way. I see young talent here that needs coaching and one or two more pieces. I don't know if Petrie leaving helps. Probably not. It depends who replaces him and I don't see anything good happening unfortunatly.
lol wwwuuuuutttttt
 
Hey hey! I may have my chance to GM an almost NBA team after all! I've always said I'd work cheap, and that would appear to be the Maloofs single criteria for just about any employee.

I was gonna make a comment about working "cheap" but it appears as though BMiller52 pretty much said what I was going to point out.
 
The Maloofs are the Maloofs and I can't do anything about that. Sell the team? Only if it stays in Sacto.

Don't want Petrie to leave. Much, much rather have him oversee the continued development whether the owners spend or not.

If he went, I wouldn't like his replacement, nobody else on here would like his repacement, probably the Maleefs won't like his replacement except for the price.

As best as I can see it, the Maloofs are staying. If they do, in order to keep some value in the frachise they may need to spend some money to get their investment back. I hope so. Might mean, with Petrie's help, some improvements will be made just to sell a few more tickets, or keep ticket holders from opting out.

But above all, keep Petrie. Petrie, please don't do the smart thing and leave.
 
I would like to see what it is like to be a Kings fan without Geoff Petrie. I know he is sort of beloved around here but I don't truly see why. He picked up Vlade and was stubborn about not letting Webber go. I give him kudos on both counts.

That's about it. Beyond that he's been lets say a competent but not sensational drafter (Douby anyone?) maybe better in the second round than in the first. His "core of Miller, Bibby, Peja" was an absolutely epic fail. His long range strategy???? Webber for moveable parts... EPIC FAIL. Had he been truly an extraordinary strategist he'd have just gone down with the Webber ship and absorbed the contract... that certainly would have been a better path than dragging us all through the Kenny Thomas era.

Beyond that, his tenure has been extremely ordinary and I don't understand why people are so very concerned that we might lose him. It is actually not easy for me to imagine a DIFFERENT gm who would do worse since the Webber/Vlade acquisition.

I hope he does go to the Blazers and gets Adelman back... that would be nice and nostalgic and I'd root for them. But Geoff Petrie is not a mythic figure to me - he's a very very average gm who was brilliantly correct at the end of the 90's (that's a long long time ago)
 
Bleh. GP got lucky and landed Webber. Was smart enough to build around him with complementary players (something he hasnt done lately with Reke/Cuz)....And since the end of the glory days has been resting on his laurels.

I think he's been going through the motions for at least 4 seasons now. Why bother when you have owners that wont spend? It would be telling to see him end up on a team with good ownership and put together a great squad, but I wouldnt count on it.

...The Maloofs are probably our new GM. We are in for a rough summer.
 
I would like to see what it is like to be a Kings fan without Geoff Petrie. I know he is sort of beloved around here but I don't truly see why. He picked up Vlade and was stubborn about not letting Webber go. I give him kudos on both counts.

That's about it. Beyond that he's been lets say a competent but not sensational drafter (Douby anyone?) maybe better in the second round than in the first. His "core of Miller, Bibby, Peja" was an absolutely epic fail. His long range strategy???? Webber for moveable parts... EPIC FAIL. Had he been truly an extraordinary strategist he'd have just gone down with the Webber ship and absorbed the contract... that certainly would have been a better path than dragging us all through the Kenny Thomas era.

Beyond that, his tenure has been extremely ordinary and I don't understand why people are so very concerned that we might lose him. It is actually not easy for me to imagine a DIFFERENT gm who would do worse since the Webber/Vlade acquisition.

I hope he does go to the Blazers and gets Adelman back... that would be nice and nostalgic and I'd root for them. But Geoff Petrie is not a mythic figure to me - he's a very very average gm who was brilliantly correct at the end of the 90's (that's a long long time ago)

How easily we discard a man's accomplishments. This is a man that inherited a team very similar to the current team in wins and losses, but with a little less talent. A team that hadn't been in the playoffs since its first year here. He drafted Brian Grant in the first round, and Michael Smith and Funderburk in the second round. And that team made the playoffs. He shocked the fanbase and was booed when he walked out on the stage and announced he had drafted Peja, instead of the fan favorite, the great John Wallace. By the way, its rumored that Petrie's first choice was a kid named Kobe Bryant, who was taken one pick before the Kings pick.

He traded to aquire Doug Christie, and made what at the time, was a somewhat unpopular trade for Chris Webber, who said he'd never tie his shoes in sacramento. In freeagency he signed an aging center that some thought was on the downside of his career. He went against the odds, and drafted a very controversal player in Jason Williams. A player that turned into a nightly highlight reel on ESPN. He then turned J. Will into Mike Bibby. He made the deal to bring Bobby Jackson to the Kings.

And yes, there was a constant turnover of support players from Jon Barry to Mad Max and Tony Delk. Along with the more permanent Scott Pollard and L. Funderburke. All of this wasn't the meanderings of an average competent GM. This was a GM with a plan, and the freedom to excute that plan, along with the capspace and the owners open wallet. Can we honestly say the same now? He did win GM of the year twice.

Yeah, I know, what have you done lately? Other than Tyreke, Cousins, and trading for Thornton, not much. Strangely enough, thats the core of our team. What an odd coincidence.

I'm not saying it might not be time for a change. Maybe it is! Maybe Petrie is tired of swimming upstream with the Maloof's. But change can mean a lot of different things, and it just might not be the change your looking for. Yeah, Petrie has made some mistakes. Name me one GM that hasn't. But compared to the GM's that preceded him in sacramento, he looks like a genius.

How about Dick Motta in 1990. He had four 1st round picks and drafted Lionel Simmons (good pick, but a no brainer), Travis Mays, Duane Causwell, and Anthony Bonner. With Bonner being the 23rd pick in the draft. He ended up with one good player in Simmons, who unfortunately suffered knee injuries a few years later. But he passed on such players as, Tyrone Hill, Terry Mills, Dee Brown, Alaa Abdelnaby, Elden Campbell, Toni Kukoc, Jud Buechler, Antonio Davis, and Cedric Ceballos. As a matter of fact, after Simmons, just about any three names on that list could have been on the Kings.

My point is, be careful what you wish for. By the way, holding up Douby as your example is ridiculous. Yeah, we get it, he was a bad choice. One bad choice! You want me to list all the good choices? Because its a long list from Brian Grant to Demarcus Cousins.
 
how easily we discard a man's accomplishments. This is a man that inherited a team very similar to the current team in wins and losses, but with a little less talent. A team that hadn't been in the playoffs since its first year here. He drafted brian grant in the first round, and michael smith and funderburk in the second round. And that team made the playoffs. He shocked the fanbase and was booed when he walked out on the stage and announced he had drafted peja, instead of the fan favorite, the great john wallace. By the way, its rumored that petrie's first choice was a kid named kobe bryant, who was taken one pick before the kings pick.

He traded to aquire doug christie, and made what at the time, was a somewhat unpopular trade for chris webber, who said he'd never tie his shoes in sacramento. In freeagency he signed an aging center that some thought was on the downside of his career. He went against the odds, and drafted a very controversal player in jason williams. A player that turned into a nightly highlight reel on espn. He then turned j. Will into mike bibby. He made the deal to bring bobby jackson to the kings.

And yes, there was a constant turnover of support players from jon barry to mad max and tony delk. Along with the more permanent scott pollard and l. Funderburke. All of this wasn't the meanderings of an average competent gm. This was a gm with a plan, and the freedom to excute that plan, along with the capspace and the owners open wallet. Can we honestly say the same now? He did win gm of the year twice.

Yeah, i know, what have you done lately? Other than tyreke, cousins, and trading for thornton, not much. Strangely enough, thats the core of our team. What an odd coincidence.

I'm not saying it might not be time for a change. Maybe it is! Maybe petrie is tired of swimming upstream with the maloof's. But change can mean a lot of different things, and it just might not be the change your looking for. Yeah, petrie has made some mistakes. Name me one gm that hasn't. But compared to the gm's that preceded him in sacramento, he looks like a genius.

How about dick motta in 1990. He had four 1st round picks and drafted lionel simmons (good pick, but a no brainer), travis mays, duane causwell, and anthony bonner. With bonner being the 23rd pick in the draft. He ended up with one good player in simmons, who unfortunately suffered knee injuries a few years later. But he passed on such players as, tyrone hill, terry mills, dee brown, alaa abdelnaby, elden campbell, toni kukoc, jud buechler, antonio davis, and cedric ceballos. As a matter of fact, after simmons, just about any three names on that list could have been on the kings.

My point is, be careful what you wish for. By the way, holding up douby as your example is ridiculous. Yeah, we get it, he was a bad choice. One bad choice! You want me to list all the good choices? Because its a long list from brian grant to demarcus cousins.

this!
 
How easily we discard a man's accomplishments. This is a man that inherited a team very similar to the current team in wins and losses, but with a little less talent. A team that hadn't been in the playoffs since its first year here. He drafted Brian Grant in the first round, and Michael Smith and Funderburk in the second round. And that team made the playoffs. He shocked the fanbase and was booed when he walked out on the stage and announced he had drafted Peja, instead of the fan favorite, the great John Wallace. By the way, its rumored that Petrie's first choice was a kid named Kobe Bryant, who was taken one pick before the Kings pick.

He traded to aquire Doug Christie, and made what at the time, was a somewhat unpopular trade for Chris Webber, who said he'd never tie his shoes in sacramento. In freeagency he signed an aging center that some thought was on the downside of his career. He went against the odds, and drafted a very controversal player in Jason Williams. A player that turned into a nightly highlight reel on ESPN. He then turned J. Will into Mike Bibby. He made the deal to bring Bobby Jackson to the Kings.

And yes, there was a constant turnover of support players from Jon Barry to Mad Max and Tony Delk. Along with the more permanent Scott Pollard and L. Funderburke. All of this wasn't the meanderings of an average competent GM. This was a GM with a plan, and the freedom to excute that plan, along with the capspace and the owners open wallet. Can we honestly say the same now? He did win GM of the year twice.

Yeah, I know, what have you done lately? Other than Tyreke, Cousins, and trading for Thornton, not much. Strangely enough, thats the core of our team. What an odd coincidence.

I'm not saying it might not be time for a change. Maybe it is! Maybe Petrie is tired of swimming upstream with the Maloof's. But change can mean a lot of different things, and it just might not be the change your looking for. Yeah, Petrie has made some mistakes. Name me one GM that hasn't. But compared to the GM's that preceded him in sacramento, he looks like a genius.

How about Dick Motta in 1990. He had four 1st round picks and drafted Lionel Simmons (good pick, but a no brainer), Travis Mays, Duane Causwell, and Anthony Bonner. With Bonner being the 23rd pick in the draft. He ended up with one good player in Simmons, who unfortunately suffered knee injuries a few years later. But he passed on such players as, Tyrone Hill, Terry Mills, Dee Brown, Alaa Abdelnaby, Elden Campbell, Toni Kukoc, Jud Buechler, Antonio Davis, and Cedric Ceballos. As a matter of fact, after Simmons, just about any three names on that list could have been on the Kings.

My point is, be careful what you wish for. By the way, holding up Douby as your example is ridiculous. Yeah, we get it, he was a bad choice. One bad choice! You want me to list all the good choices? Because its a long list from Brian Grant to Demarcus Cousins.

I'm not forgetting anything. Seriously if you're going to rate Geoff on the period through 2004 that's ok but that is an awful long time ago and I think you could throw a dart at a board and find a gm who would have won with Vlade and Webber.

Yes please list all the great first round draft choices - the ones that were INNOVATIVE or CLEVER or AGAINST THE GRAIN BUT WORKED OUT - I mean the ones that would distinguish Geoff as a drafting genius. I will maintain that in many cases he either took the consensus guy, or there was somebody better on the board in hindsight, or he made a bad move (the Jimmer trade) or lack of moves when the chips were down. Most GM's would have taken both Reke and Cousins in those slots I just don't see how we applaud Geoff for those picks. I might be wrong about that we can never know for sure but I don't think either of those picks were especially bright - he just took the best player who dropped to our spot in each case.

Douby is the epitome of draft fail so of course that is the one a Geoff critic will cite, but Jimmer is right up there too.

I think if we cherry pick Geoff's accomplishments, and compare him to a hypothetical stupid piece of wood GM who might have made "worse" choices (doubtful) then he comes out looking good.

But we have all the goofy MLE moves... and we have years of deterioration to a perennial bottom 3 team in the NBA, and it is on Geoff's watch.

So I am being careful what I wish for... I wish for a new GM with my eyes wide open that I might not get he benefit of Geoff Petrie's supposed greatness any more.
 
Yeah, I know, what have you done lately? Other than Tyreke, Cousins, and trading for Thornton, not much. Strangely enough, thats the core of our team. What an odd coincidence.

the core of one of the worst teams in the nba.... now Thornton is a stat stuffer on a bad team he is not a piece in a perennial playoff team and indeed he is sort of in the way. Give me a gm who will ship him off and let Reke and IT be the back court, with a SF who is not Salmons, and you'll have something.
 
So Petrie traded Spencer for Daly, then went after Chuck instead of initially going after Daly first. No matter the excuse, either of Spencer of Daly would look far better next to Cuz than Chuck. That's one poor chain of events out of a number of them by Petrie, but looks even worse while Spencer just became the first Phily center since Moses to score back to back 20 pt playoff games, while playing some very good defense, both wins btw, while Chuck as I type this is probably eating a happy meal.

Problem with Petrie is there's a number of things to blame him for. Roster of course is the big issue, and collecting pieces which don't fit while trading away pieces which do. Even a tight budget isn't an excuse for Chuck, for Travis, for the Salmons trade, or including a 1st rounder in the JJ/Omri swap. Tight budget also isn't an excuse for trading down to 10 and picking Jimmer, when Leonard, Klay Thompson or Bismack would all most likely have helped this team considerably more, and I personally like Jimmer and think he'll slowly get better, but that is a pretty large number of mistakes in the last year alone.

It's not even about getting a big fish, but more that he hasn't recongnized or made sound decisions with the resources we do/did have. Either keep Spencer or go after Daly hard as a FA, draft any of the above three mentioned, keep Beno, don't trade that f'ing 1st rounder, don't waste 34M in Chuck/Travis, and we're a considerably better team, and we HAVE NOT spent more than we are now.

Then there's the coaching. As a gm if you take the rebuilding route, which we have and have been shoulder deep in for a few years now, then it's responsibility to make damn sure you hire a good coach that can develop young players. But is paying Westy/Smart at the same damn time a better allocation of money than just going out and hiring an at least average coach? Putting together an incredibly young roster, and not hiring a sound coach might be the biggest indictment of all his errors. Committing to a rebuild while not committing to hiring a coach capable of developing the young talent, or even having a clue ho wto use the the young players, is inexcusable.

Now, all that being said, the only reason I might keep him around is that it would be the Maloofs picking the new gm. That scares me, but can it really get that much worse? Name me 5 gm's worse in the last 5 yrs and maybe I strongly consider the possibility it would get much worse. But I don't praise Petire for drafting Cuz or Reke. Cuz was a no brainer, and I would have taken him at one. Notice Petrie didn't actually move up to secure him earlier. The idiot who passed on Cuz in Minn is currently doing a better job than our own gm. Reke or Rubio, both available, was a no brainer. Wouldn't have gone wrong with either. I like Reke more, but you don't get much credit when both drop in your lap and you have to just pick one. IT was a steal, but that overshadows how poor Jimmer has been and how much more a Leonard, Thompson or Bismack might help. Trading for MT was great, but then he hurt one of his brightest moments of recent history by not bringing in a coach who could manage the IT/MT/Reke trio he assembled.
 
Last edited:
I'm not forgetting anything. Seriously if you're going to rate Geoff on the period through 2004 that's ok but that is an awful long time ago and I think you could throw a dart at a board and find a gm who would have won with Vlade and Webber.

Yes please list all the great first round draft choices - the ones that were INNOVATIVE or CLEVER or AGAINST THE GRAIN BUT WORKED OUT - I mean the ones that would distinguish Geoff as a drafting genius. I will maintain that in many cases he either took the consensus guy, or there was somebody better on the board in hindsight, or he made a bad move (the Jimmer trade) or lack of moves when the chips were down. Most GM's would have taken both Reke and Cousins in those slots I just don't see how we applaud Geoff for those picks. I might be wrong about that we can never know for sure but I don't think either of those picks were especially bright - he just took the best player who dropped to our spot in each case.

Douby is the epitome of draft fail so of course that is the one a Geoff critic will cite, but Jimmer is right up there too.

I think if we cherry pick Geoff's accomplishments, and compare him to a hypothetical stupid piece of wood GM who might have made "worse" choices (doubtful) then he comes out looking good.

But we have all the goofy MLE moves... and we have years of deterioration to a perennial bottom 3 team in the NBA, and it is on Geoff's watch.

So I am being careful what I wish for... I wish for a new GM with my eyes wide open that I might not get he benefit of Geoff Petrie's supposed greatness any more.

So Grant, Wallace, Peja, Hedo, Martin etc were all the consensus picks? Hardly. Say what you want about Petrie, but talent evaluation is a strong suit of his.
 
We might as well start planning the farewell party for Petrie. That comment from Joe Maloof is about as non-supportive as you could get. "We'd love to keep him but we aren't going to hold him back" is Maloof code for "We can't afford him anyway."

I'm not the biggest Petrie supporter but I'm fully convinced that the Maloofs want NOTHING good to happen to this team as long as the team is in Sacramento.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top