Maloofs' PR disaster increases their urgency to resign Bonzi?

VF21 said:
Sorry, but you're way off base. Had they done this with just a modicum of tact and finesse and shown at least borderline respect for Rick Adelman, you wouldn't see me complaining. I was pretty much expecting him to be gone...and said so numerous times during the season. I respect Adelman and what he did but if they want to go in a different direction, have a change of focus, etc. it is - bottom line - their team. It was entirely the shoddy manner in which he was treated AND The obvious duplicity of the Maloofs that has sparked my comments.

But you know what? I'm getting over it. The only ones who seem to be bent on whipping the horse are the people who are glad Adelman is gone. They're gonna ride this as long as they can in their glee.

Hey, whatever floats your boat.

Peace.
I never pointed out you as one who would complain if he were let go in a different manner. I was speaking in general terms, and you know there would be people still calling for the Maloof's heads no matter how Adelman was let go. I'm not glad Adelman is gone, the only reason being I believe he could tame Artest. That is the only reason though. I doubt you'll find a post here with me cheering that Adelman is gone, so I don't understand the "whatever floats your boat" comment. Maybe that was meant for others?
 
thesanityannex said:
I never pointed out you as one who would complain if he were let go in a different manner. I was speaking in general terms, and you know there would be people still calling for the Maloof's heads no matter how Adelman was let go. I'm not glad Adelman is gone, the only reason being I believe he could tame Artest. That is the only reason though. I doubt you'll find a post here with me cheering that Adelman is gone, so I don't understand the "whatever floats your boat" comment. Maybe that was meant for others?

Sorry. That was actually a typo. I've corrected it so that it goes along - as it should - with the sentences immediately before it.
 
thesanityannex said:
No, it doesn't make it any less ****ed up, but then, what difference does it really make in the end? Rick is gone either way.

I suppose that looking at purely the bottom line, dollars and cents of it all, the difference is not huge -- I'll still buy tickets, I'll still buy tacky little Kings knick knacks, I'll still fork over the bucks and I'll still cheer for the team.

However, it makes a difference to me. And again, this isn't the first thing that's rubbed me the wrong way. The things we've seen over the last few years have turned me off big time -- from the ridiculous over-marketing of the gold standard crap, to the giant corporate sponsored "tribute" outside of Arco, to the repeated mishandling of player/personnel changes, and now the massively smarmy spin job we're being treated to -- just a whole bunch of yucky. At this point, I love the Sacramento Kings as a TEAM. As an organization? Not so much. If THAT doesn't make a difference to someone, it damn well should.

I'm still a fan, and will continue to be one, but it would be nice to be able to have a little respect for the people that own/run the team I've chosen to support. And it would also be nice to think that they cared whether or not that respect was there.
 
Last edited:
thesanityannex said:
With the way the Maloofs did it though, it just gives the Adelman fans more to complain about.


VF21 said:
Sorry, but you're way off base. Had they done this with just a modicum of tact and finesse and shown at least borderline respect for Rick Adelman, you wouldn't see me complaining.

I really don't think I'm way off base.
I think we are somewhat in agreement on this issue.
 
GoGoGadget said:
I suppose that looking at purely the bottom line, dollars and cents of it all, the difference is not huge -- I'll still buy tickets, I'll still buy tacky little Kings knick knacks, I'll still fork over the bucks and I'll still cheer for the team.

However, it makes a difference to me. And again, this isn't the first thing that's rubbed me the wrong way. The things we've seen over the last few years have turned me off big time -- from the ridiculous over-marketing of the gold standard crap, to the giant corporate sponsered "tribute" outside of Arco, to the repeated mishandling of player/personnel changes, and now the massively smarmy spin job we're being treated to -- just a whole bunch of yucky. At this point, I love the Sacramento Kings as a TEAM. As an organization? Not so much. If THAT doesn't make a difference to someone, it damn well should.

I'm still a fan, and will continue to be one, but it would be nice to be able to have a little respect for the people that own/run the team I've chosen to support. And it would also be nice to think that they cared whether or not that respect was there.

G3 - Thank you. You have said what I have been trying to say for two days. And you've said it very well. I know some won't agree with you but it's the whole "yucky" that I really object to the most.

Nice post.
 
Bricklayer said:
This ABSOLUTELY could have been handled with class and dignity and people would be moving on much quicker by this point.

I agree................ ;)
 
thesanityannex said:
I really don't think I'm way off base.
I think we are somewhat in agreement on this issue.

Then I apologize for the misinterpretation of YOUR post. ;)

It's been a tough couple of days. I read too much into your statement.

Mea culpa.
 
GoGoGadget said:
I suppose that looking at purely the bottom line, dollars and cents of it all, the difference is not huge -- I'll still buy tickets, I'll still buy tacky little Kings knick knacks, I'll still fork over the bucks and I'll still cheer for the team.

However, it makes a difference to me. And again, this isn't the first thing that's rubbed me the wrong way. The things we've seen over the last few years have turned me off big time -- from the ridiculous over-marketing of the gold standard crap, to the giant corporate sponsered "tribute" outside of Arco, to the repeated mishandling of player/personnel changes, and now the massively smarmy spin job we're being treated to -- just a whole bunch of yucky. At this point, I love the Sacramento Kings as a TEAM. As an organization? Not so much. If THAT doesn't make a difference to someone, it damn well should.

I'm still a fan, and will continue to be one, but it would be nice to be able to have a little respect for the people that own/run the team I've chosen to support. And it would also be nice to think that they cared whether or not that respect was there.
I think the reason I don't feel the same as many here is that I'm not living in the area anymore. And your post GGG, helped me come to that realization. I'm far separated from the media you guys are in touch with; radio, tv, newspapers. All I really look at is the bottom line. I want this team to win, and the internal happenings don't really concern me all that much. In no way do I think the way they went about his firing was decent, but I was quickly over it due to the fact that I'm not "in touch" with the team anymore. I'm a television Kings fan now.
 
Wow...

Could someone explain to me EXACTLY (with evidence) how Rick's "firing" was handled in an unclassy way?

Like someone said earlier, I think the majority of people are angry not because of some perceived slight against Adelman, but instead would have been angry regardless because they can't let go of the memories of 2002 with Adelman, Webber, Peja, Hedo, etc.

This is a different team, with different players. Adelman made crucial mistakes that, although did not cost us the series, made winning the series very difficult. Game 2 and the non-substitution of Wells, anyone? How about Game 5 with Miller in the game over SAR? The list goes on and on with this guy.

To me, the reaction to Rick's firing is the difference between Sacramento's fan base and other teams' fan base: the majority of fans complain when Rick is in there doing crap that costs us games and respect, but when the Maloofs FINALLY do something about it, they're criticized. What the heck did you expect them to do? Can someone answer that? Did you want them to host a video presentation to a full house at Arco showing Rick's greatest moments before the firing? Or how about a bonfire or picnic to celebrate his accomplishments? Give me a break guys!

In New York, LA, Chicago, etc. coaches are shown the door in a MUCH less ceremonious fashion without much as a peep from people. When this team gets a defensive-minded coach and are playing San Antonio again next year, this time in the WCF, I bet some of the cryers won't be complaining then.

"We shouldn't have traded Peja..."
"We shouldn't have traded Webber..."
"They should have handled the Adelman situation differently..."

C'mon, this is a business, and frankly allowing Petrie to give Rick the firing he did get is more than a lot of teams/owners would do--I guarantee it.

I SUPPORT the Maloofs 110%. They did what they thought needed to be done to take this franchise to the next level. This isn't about making friends, or allowing the team to stagnate in mediocrity as a 3-6 seed with a 1st-2nd round exit just to keep "the most winningest coach in team history". This is about making this team a championship team. About bringing that parade to J Street like we should have had in 2002.

When it happens, I'm going to be the first one there to say thank you to Joe and Gavin. Thank you for not listening to your hearts, but using your heads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Explain to you with evidence?

There are a myriad of threads about it and a number of articles from the Bee. Unfortunately, you're about a day late to the party. Most people are actually moving past it...

And for the record, it wasn't his firing that people are objecting to. It was how it was done. And the whole thing has been argued ad nauseum. There are answers to all your questions in the threads. As far as I'm concerned, I simply don't have the energy nor the inclination to fight the battle again.
 
VF21 said:
Explain to you with evidence?

There are a myriad of threads about it and a number of articles from the Bee. Unfortunately, you're about a day late to the party. Most people are actually moving past it...

And for the record, it wasn't his firing that people are objecting to. It was how it was done. And the whole thing has been argued ad nauseum. There are answers to all your questions in the threads. As far as I'm concerned, I simply don't have the energy nor the inclination to fight the battle again.

Um, evidenced by the 100 posts IN THE LAST 5 HOURS that people are moving past it? Come on, lady. You actually just like to be condescending, don't you?

And actually I was hoping for a response from someone that can talk BASKETBALL, not emotions, thank you. Can anyone else actually explain what the Maloofs did wrong? I honestly want to know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was civil in my response to you. You can make an effort to be the same in return.

Thanks ever so.
 
209KingsFan said:
Can anyone else actually explain what the Maloofs did wrong?
They didn't build a gold statue of Rick next to the big "6".
 
thesanityannex said:
They didn't build a gold statue of Rick next to the big "6".

Rollingonfloorlaughing.gif


Actually, I think it was the whole GOLD thing. The final vote for Adelman's statue was onyx with alexandrite, I think.
 
209KingsFan said:
Wow...

Could someone explain to me EXACTLY (with evidence) how Rick's "firing" was handled in an unclassy way?

Like someone said earlier, I think the majority of people are angry not because of some perceived slight against Adelman, but instead would have been angry regardless because they can't let go of the memories of 2002 with Adelman, Webber, Peja, Hedo, etc.

This is a different team, with different players. Adelman made crucial mistakes that, although did not cost us the series, made winning the series very difficult. Game 2 and the non-substitution of Wells, anyone? How about Game 5 with Miller in the game over SAR? The list goes on and on with this guy.

To me, the reaction to Rick's firing is the difference between Sacramento's fan base and other teams' fan base: the majority of fans complain when Rick is in there doing crap that costs us games and respect, but when the Maloofs FINALLY do something about it, they're criticized. What the heck did you expect them to do? Can someone answer that? Did you want them to host a video presentation to a full house at Arco showing Rick's greatest moments before the firing? Or how about a bonfire or picnic to celebrate his accomplishments? Give me a break guys!

In New York, LA, Chicago, etc. coaches are shown the door in a MUCH less ceremonious fashion without much as a peep from people. When this team gets a defensive-minded coach and are playing San Antonio again next year, this time in the WCF, I bet some of the cryers won't be complaining then.

"We shouldn't have traded Peja..."
"We shouldn't have traded Webber..."
"They should have handled the Adelman situation differently..."

C'mon, this is a business, and frankly allowing Petrie to give Rick the firing he did get is more than a lot of teams/owners would do--I guarantee it.

I SUPPORT the Maloofs 110%. They did what they thought needed to be done to take this franchise to the next level. This isn't about making friends, or allowing the team to stagnate in mediocrity as a 3-6 seed with a 1st-2nd round exit just to keep "the most winningest coach in team history". This is about making this team a championship team. About bringing that parade to J Street like we should have had in 2002.

When it happens, I'm going to be the first one there to say thank you to Joe and Gavin. Thank you for not listening to your hearts, but using your heads.

WOW...you are really missing the point. If you peruse the posts briefly, you'll realize that most people in this forum aren't debating whether Maloofs did the right thing by dismissing Adelman...but rather the lack of professionalism in handling a business and relationships.

The Maloofs vow to mow Chris' lawn in order to sign him, but let Petrie dish out the news when he is traded.

The Maloofs said repeatedly they wanted to resign Peja, only to let him find out that he's been traded sitting in a hotel room watching ESPN.

The Maloofs could have told Adelman they didn't want him anymore in person (perfectly fine) but they again let Petrie do all the dirty work.

A simple phone call and a little bit of honesty is all anyone asks.

I think these evidence speak for themselves.
 
Last edited:
Kings Fan, Acording to RA it was even worse that that. Rick spoke to one of the Maloofs about wanting to come back just a few hours before Petrie called to tell him they were not renewing his contract. Rude and cowardly.
 
HndsmCelt said:
Kings Fan, Acording to RA it was even worse that that. Rick spoke to one of the Maloofs about wanting to come back just a few hours before Petrie called to tell him they were not renewing his contract. Rude and cowardly.

Yes, when someone (in this case Rick) makes the initiative to tell his boss that he would like to return, I think the boss should return the call in person to be the bearer of good or bad news.

No matter what Joe says on radio, it's hard to convince anyone that the family made the decision in the span of that 3 hours following Rick's call. They made this decision months ago.
 
Last edited:
Bricklayer said:
No Riley it is a PR disaster IN SPITE of what your little minority would like to argue. It is you who are sitting around willing to accept anything just to get rid of Adelman. The PR disaster on the other hand is FACT. As in called out in the papers, bashed on the radio, overwhelmingly negative FACT. Doesn't matter who is right or wrong about Adelman, it still has been a public relations NIGHTMARE that has given the Maloofs another major blackeye.

Yep, and again, from a previous post of mine, talking about the Maloofs and the decision with Adelman:



Apparently they thought it wasn't going to get any better and wanted to change coaches. That is their right and perogative as owners.

However, they went about it in completely the wrong way, and it may have damaged their chances of hiring a quality coach after watching how they treat "important" employees. It isn't just about Rick, you know. It's setting a tone for the organization and establishing a good relationship with employees - players, coaches, everyone else associated with the team as well. This was not the way to do that.

There is always a long and short term effect to an action. Although the short term effect for the Maloofs (not having to get their hands "dirty" by personally talking with the coach that got your team to where it is today vs. where it was 8 years ago) may be a little comfort in having Rick gone via a call with GP, for whatever reason they aren't sharing - the long term effect is the erosion of "goodwill" between management and employees.
 
I agree completely with GGG - a total lack of class and a continuation of poorly handling the letting go of/and or trades of their employees. I also agree with Warhawk - it may hurt the team in ways that extend well beyond a "PR disaster".

I was for letting go of Peja - he didn't seem happy here and I felt it would better serve him and the team to be somewhere else. I have a lot of respect for Peja and I think he was wonderful when he was happy - he had many good years here. To find out that your traded by turning on the TV is completely unacceptable to me.

It's not the act it's how it is done that is really not sitting well with me.

I think, however, that we - the fans - have made up in some small ways for the Aloofs. I believe that Doug, Chris, Peja, Bobby, and Rick are aware that we (the fans) loved and appreciated them. I wish they could read some of these boards.
 
treewoman said:
I agree completely with GGG - a total lack of class and a continuation of poorly handling the letting go of/and or trades of their employees. I also agree with Warhawk - it may hurt the team in ways that extend well beyond a "PR disaster".

I was for letting go of Peja - he didn't seem happy here and I felt it would better serve him and the team to be somewhere else. I have a lot of respect for Peja and I think he was wonderful when he was happy - he had many good years here. To find out that your traded by turning on the TV is completely unacceptable to me.

It's not the act it's how it is done that is really not sitting well with me.

I think, however, that we - the fans - have made up in some small ways for the Aloofs. I believe that Doug, Chris, Peja, Bobby, and Rick are aware that we (the fans) loved and appreciated them. I wish they could read some of these boards.

Excellent point. And I'm reasonably sure those players - and a lot of others - have friends or family who do, in fact, scan the fan boards once in a while. I'm sure they know how we feel...
 
The interesting thing is that at least at lower levels the Maloofs/Kings organization treat their employees VERY well.

Two of my best friends have worked for the Kings for a long time(pre Maloof). They both rave about the organization. Moreover, in terms of fan relations the organization has always ranks very high.

Odd disconnect in this case.
 
thesanityannex said:
No, it doesn't make it any less ****ed up, but then, what difference does it really make in the end? Rick is gone either way.


I think people would have complained either way he was let go, be it the "kick in the arse there is the door", or the "pat on the back we wish you well" dismissal.

With the way the Maloofs did it though, it just gives the Adelman fans more to complain about.

I agree somewhat with your sentiment, the other thing is that this may be a PR disaster but is not a disaster. With some personel moves, and solid coach this team will be back in the running again.
 
Back
Top