Landry Fields

twslam07

All-Star
I have been obssessing about him for the past few days and I'm sure some of you are sick of me bringing him up, but I think he could solve our problems at a very, very reasonable price.

I find it interesting that he is never brought up when we discuss potential SFs for this team. He is capable of doing everything we want out of a SF. 3PT shooting, rebounding, passing, and defense.

He definitely has the size to play SFs and since he usually plays SG I'm sure he has the athleticism to play SF as well. His measurements are almost identical to Batums.

Fields
Height in shoes - 6'7.5"
Wingspan - 6'9.5"
Standing Reach - 8'8.5"
Weight - 216

Batum
Height in shoes - 6'7.75"
Wingspan - 7'0.75"
Standing Reach - 8'8.75"
Weight - 214

As you can see the only significant difference is wingspan where he has a 3 inch advantage, but everything is practically identical.

Now Fields did not have the season Batum did last year. In fact it seems that Fields regressed last season, but this regression can be explained. Let's look at his 2010-2011 stats compared to 2011-2012 stats.

10-11: MPG - 31:00 FG% - 49.7 3PT% - 39.3 FT% - 76.9 PPG - 9.7 REB - 6.4 APG - 1.9 STL - 1.0 BLK - 0.2 TO - 1.3
11-12: MPG - 28:41 FG% - 46.0 3PT% - 25.6 FT% - 56.2 PPG - 8.8 REB - 4.2 APG - 2.6 STL - 1.2 BLK - 0.3 TO - 1.6

The first thing that pops out is the 3PT% and FT%. This took a giant dip between these two years. I'm aware that Fields tried to change his shot during the offseason. As a result his shot was noticeably flatter this coming season and significantly impacted his shooting percentages. Fields is known as a hard worker and I'm sure he is going to readdress his shot this offseason and have it headed in the right direction. His FG% stayed relatively the same because of his efficiency to finish at the rim which he is good at. The second thing that pops out are his rebounding numbers. They went down by 2.2 a game. This can be explained with the arrival of Chandler who is a rebounding machine. The year before, their only decent rebounder was Stoudemire which allowed Fields to step up and win rebounds with his size, length, and athleticism. The last thing that pops out are the assists. His assists went up by .7 which is a promising sign. It shows that he is willing to pass and distrbute and that he is learning more and more how to play the game.

His value to us rides on if he can return his jumpshot to a similar percentage from his rookie season. If he is able to return to his rookie season form, then he would be an excellent fit for us. Let's compare Fields' rookie season stats versus Batum's stats last season.

Fields: MPG - 31:00 FG% - 49.7 3PT% - 39.3 FT% - 76.9 PPG - 9.70 REB - 6.4 APG - 1.9 STL - 1.0 BLK - 0.2 TO - 1.3
Batum: MPG - 30:23 FG% - 45.1 3PT% - 39.1 FT% - 83.7 PPG - 13.9 REB - 4.6 APG - 1.4 STL - 1.0 BLK - 1.0 TO - 1.5

Their numbers are not that different, and he should definitely be considered as a free agent signing for us. Once again, he does many of the things we covet at SF. 3PT shooting, rebounding, passing, defense, has a role players mentality, and is a great teammate. If Fields can return to his rookie season form, he would be a great consilation prize to Batum.

Sorry guys. This has been building up for awhile. :)
 
The first thing that pops out is the 3PT% and FT%. This took a giant dip between these two years. I'm aware that Fields tried to change his shot during the offseason. As a result his shot was noticeably flatter this coming season and significantly impacted his shooting percentages.

This story may be true, but it sounds really odd. Why would he drastically change something that worked fine? And why would he not change back once he saw that it's not working? Could it be an injury of some sort?

His value to us rides on if he can return his jumpshot to a similar percentage from his rookie season.

I'm not sure he's worth the gamble, especially since NY is intent on matching offers, so he may not be as cheap to acquire as you think.

Another thing I'm not sure about is how well he can defend small forwards. He mostly plays SG in NY, and I don't recall him displaying any exceptional D against larger players. Do you?
 
This story may be true, but it sounds really odd. Why would he drastically change something that worked fine? And why would he not change back once he saw that it's not working? Could it be an injury of some sort?



I'm not sure he's worth the gamble, especially since NY is intent on matching offers, so he may not be as cheap to acquire as you think.

Another thing I'm not sure about is how well he can defend small forwards. He mostly plays SG in NY, and I don't recall him displaying any exceptional D against larger players. Do you?

Well if he spends the enitre offseason changing his shot it is not as simple as going back to his old shot. His new shot is second nature to him now. It takes a good amount of time to make something second nature so it's not as easy as switching it back and forth. Why did he fiddle with it in the first place? I'm not sure. Maybe it was his work ethic. Trying to fix something that doesn't need to be fixed or maybe he saw something in his shot he didn't like and tried to fix it. These are all speculations of course.

To answer the affordability questions, the Knicks have 57 million in salaries for 3 players (Anthony, Stoudemire, and Chandler). If they want to keep Shumpert and Douglas that will be another 4 mil. So that brings them to 61 mil. The Knicks have made it known that they want to resign Lin too. How much do you think he will be worth? Maybe 8 mil? So that brings them to 69 mil among 6 players. I'm not sure if the Knicks will be able to afford Fields if we throw him 4-5 mil. Who knows, you might be right though.

He mostly played SG for the Knicks because they had Chandler and Gallinari to man the SF position his rookie season and then Anthony this last season. Like I mentioned in my post he has the size and length to play SF and has been guarding smaller quicker SGs so I'm sure he is athletic enough to guard SFs. It comes down to if he is strong enough to guard the bigger SFs. But as I mentioned in my post, Fields and Batum weigh the same so if Fields is not strong enough I could make the same argument for Batum. Now I know weight does not translate into strength, but there is definitely a correlation.
 
All this is about, is Toronto trying to take Fields out of play for a sign and trade from NY to the Suns for Nash. If he accepts Toronto's offer, and the Knicks match the offer, Fields can't be traded again. However, no deal can be consumated until july 11th, so I suspose the Knicks can still get an offer accepted for a sign and trade with the Suns, as long as Fields agrees to it. Very confusing, which is why I hate this twilight zone period.
 
Good news for us.

I like how you are trying to intentionally trigger a response out of me. This isn't the first time I've seen you do this on this forum. I'm not sure what your motivation is.

With that being said I don't see how a tall and long athletic player who can shoot and play defense being taken off the market is good.
 
Last edited:
I like how you are trying to intentionally trigger a response out of me. This isn't the first time I've seen you do this on this forum. I'm not sure what your motivation is.

With that being said I don't see how a tall and long athletic player who can shoot and play defense being taken off the market is good.

For the millionth time (to various posters), use the ignore function. Or at the very least, don't quote him so I don't have to read it. He's an attention seeker.
 
Back
Top