ForlornKing
Starter
I thought his handles and finishing ability would be a littttttle bit better but I still really like him as a prospect.
Im not worried about McLemore after one game
1: the knee injury might have played into the fact that all his shots were coming up short
2: his stroke is beautiful
3: i have a feeling the coaches told him to just go out there and keep shooting the ball, don't worry about the misses.
Those off ball screens are so foreign to us Kings' fans lol. Not only that, our big men other than Chuck Hayes were horrific screeners.
It's only one game but if I'm judging JUST on this one game MLM looked like a chucker without a good shot and McCallum looked average speedwise at best and not impressive in any aspect. Hopefully have a better showing next time out.
Disagree regarding McCallum. I think he played really well. I was actually surprised at how good he was
If given the time and proper coaching, he can be a PG in the way Russell Westbrook is. You know how much growing pains they went through with Westbrook at PG? They stuck with it and now, they have the most physically dominating PG in the league. The Kings could have had the same advantage if they left had left Reke at PG. They gave up on it too soon.
McCallum was VERY impressive. his ball handling is great, he passes the ball very well, his athleticism is insane. as of right now, i dont think Jimmer is going to play anymore minutes on this team.
its obviously too early to tell, but i wouldnt be surprised if McCallum even challenges Isaiah for his spot
Disagree regarding McCallum. I think he played really well. I was actually surprised at how good he was
No he couldn't, Westbrook is 10x better at seeing the floor and adjusting to defensive schemes thrown at him. Westbrook isn't your typical PG but he does have the PG qualities which matter most, something that Evans doesn't have.
Now given time and proper coaching? I doubt it. I feel you're either born with it or not born with it. Evans in four years has never really shown on a consistent basis that he can run an NBA offense and make adjustments on the fly. Not saying he's one dimensional, because he can play PG in spurts and he can do a LOT for us had he been given the chance, but not full time PG unless there is another go-to ball handler/distributor on the floor with him.. Once Iggy signed with GS I didn't want any part of Evans at PG (being the only ball handler/distributor).
Give GV a chance. I think he will impress you all.
Westbrook also developed a solid midrange game to go with his already elite speed and athletic ability. Also, although i find Westbrook annoying, i have to admit the guy plays with that fire/swagger that the best players in the league have, he certainly doesn't lack confidence. Tyreke is/was just too passive and not vocal, which are bad traits for a lead guard.
I hope he develops a way to create his own shot. Are there players that didn't have much of a handling game and then improved later to create their own shot at will?
It's only one game but if I'm judging JUST on this one game MLM looked like a chucker without a good shot and McCallum looked average speedwise at best and not impressive in any aspect. Hopefully have a better showing next time out.
What game were you watching? he could (operative word being could) be an Andre Miller-type player for us, which certainly isn't a bad thing and would be an incredible feat for a second round pick.
No he couldn't, Westbrook is 10x better at seeing the floor and adjusting to defensive schemes thrown at him. Westbrook isn't your typical PG but he does have the PG qualities which matter most, something that Evans doesn't have.
They are still kids and will take some time. It should be interesting to watch Ben M and his progress. By the start of the season, the Kings are going to be radically different which is a good thing. I listened to the commentary regarding Cousins with interest and agreement.
"I thought they were all good shots ..."
"I thought they were all good shots ..."![]()
".....and stuff like that." lol