For the record, I'm happy with Barnes. But before Barnes, I would have liked us to get Oubre rather than Porter.Some of you really, really want Oubre, don’t you? The longing for that guy on this board never seems to stop!
‘A’ for effort!
Kings fans love him. Advanced metrics hate him. Click here to find out why!
https://www.washingtoncitypaper.com...the-right-move-in-trading-away-kelly-oubre-jr
Seriously though, even if you count his improvement after getting traded to PHO, his advanced stats were still worse than Justin Jackson overall.
Some of you really, really want Oubre, don’t you? The longing for that guy on this board never seems to stop!
‘A’ for effort!
I'm not one of them. It would take very little time before the very same people that wanted him here, to be calling for his head. I have no idea what there is to rave about with Oubre. He's been in the league for 4 years, and in that time, he's had almost zero improvement. His overall shooting percentage of 42.4% and his three point percentage of 32.1% hasn't changed more than a few tenths of a percentage point in that four year span. He's not a good passer who averages less than one assist a game. He's an average to below average rebounder.
Yes, he'll have that occasional game where he looks like a superstar, but so does Willie. I'd go so far as to say that Oubre is more inconsistent than Wille is. I simply don't get the fascination with him. Other than being a good athlete, I don't see that much to get excited about.
Supposedly there a people interested in him at 4/80 or more.
Hopefully not usSupposedly there a people interested in him at 4/80 or more.
If the rumor is true, big if.
The only team I can think of is us.
So it looks more like the rumor is that the Kings are among the teams that might be a landing spot for Oubre, combined with the idea that Tim Montemayor thinks that 4/$80M is a reasonable deal for him. That's not quite a rumor that somebody is actually offering 4/$80M, unless his broadcast is more specific in sourcing 4/$80M as an actual rumor.
(Lordy, using the phrase "actual rumor" to distinguish it from something even more tenuous...gotta love the offseason!)
For the record, I'm happy with Barnes. But before Barnes, I would have liked us to get Oubre rather than Porter.
Whoa! Oubre with the Bulls looked like he might be one trade away from becoming a real player. But everyone was talking about Porter, and Porter was looking to get paid big time (despite not having an alpha mentality on the offensive end).If your talking only about money, then I get where your coming from. But other than that, Porter is ten times the player Oubre is. I'm always fascinated by people who hate Willie for his inconsistency, but love Oubre, who is probably more inconsistent than Willie. Look, Oubre, like Willie is a terrific athlete, but he can't shoot the ball from the three. He sometimes plays terrific defense, and then other times seems to be day dreaming. If Barnes and Porter are 10's on a scale of 1 to 10, then Oubre is about a 4 or 5. The one thing he has going for him is that he's young.
Oubre has been in the league for 4 years, and his 3pt shot hasn't improved one bit. He's a career 32.1% 3 pt shooter, and last year he shot 31.1%. If your looking for players to stretch the floor, Oubre isn't one of them. Yeah, he'll have that occasional game where he's hot, but he'll follow that game with a clinker. I know I'm being redundant here, but I just don't get the love....
Personally I'd rather keep Barnes.
But what do we do if he walks away?
Is there another younger SF you try to land?
What do you think the Suns match?