Kings Players Want Isaiah Thomas to Start?
- Thread starter shockdoc
- Start date
chief bromden
Starter
That is a good read, thanks for posting it. Interesting that Cuz wore an IT jersey, could be interpreted in different ways.
RIP Dwayne Schintzius, nice av
RIP Dwayne Schintzius, nice av
That's pretty much what I got. Based on what we're hearing from players via twitter, etc., they're fed up with the inconsistency. I think if there were roles and responsibilities, as opposed to Smart telling everyone they can be everything (think Johnson in the offseason), then there might not be as much agitas. It's funny that how last year people pointed to Smart doing the same thing with Curry at GSW than to what he did last year to Evans. That is a more appropriate comparison than with IT, but I get what the article (blog?) is trying to say.
The player revolt issue, however, is different from the Thomas starting issue. I think that Brooks is definitely a better fit next to Evans, and a healthy Evans this year has been the straw that stirs the drink. However, he's been injured as of late, and that in itself leaves a pretty big hole on this team both offensively and defensively. IT just isn't a good fit next to Evans. We've done that, and it didn't lead to any more wins. In fact, one could argue that it led to fewer wins and minimized what Evans can do.
My solution would be to move IT (or Jimmer), paired with one of our 86 small forwards, to a different team in exchange for anything taller than 6' 9". At this point, I don't care about how good they are, I just want numbers that will force Smart to coach/distribute minutes with more rationality than he's been shown able to do.
Kingster
Hall of Famer
"Namely, sources close to key Kings players have told ProBasketballTalk that they are frustrated with the fact that point guard Isaiah Thomas isn’t starting and acting as the team’s floor general."
Read the article. If there are sources then there are sources talking about wanting IT to start, not an inference from a Cousins' t-shirt.
Read the article. If there are sources then there are sources talking about wanting IT to start, not an inference from a Cousins' t-shirt.
Sources close to key Kings players have told me that they are frustrated with the fact that Travis Outlaw isn't the focal point of our offense.
I find it funny how this article heaps so much praise on IT and his assist numbers and what not, and compares that with our "failed strategy" of Tyreke Evans and Cousins and what not. How many wins did we get last year again? I am somehow failing to see how IT as the primary ballhandler has shown any greater success than Evans and Cousins going 1 on 1. I'm not saying that it isn't a good idea going forward or that it can be further improved on, but to imply that our overall team play last year with IT at the helm was any better than any of our other past 3 seasons is not grounded in facts if you ask me.
On a side and somewhat related note, I watched the Knicks Nets game and JVG's basketball philosophy is some serious and sensible stuff. I would like him as coach. He talked about how Steve Novak hasn't had a turnover in the last 20 games because he doesn't try to do too much, he plays within his role which is to either catch and shoot or move the ball. Mike Woodson's coaching staff is also doing a good job motivating the players: they do "sprints" during practice after every time the Knicks commit less than 13 turnovers in a game. JVG also talked about how you give your elite offensive talent some freedom, referring to Carmelo pulling up for 3s in transition, but how you cannot offer that same freedom to your other guys like Raymond Felton. On the topic of Andray Blatche, JVG talked about how you can't just surround young guys with other young guys, because then they don't have anyone to teach them the proper way of doing things in the NBA. He said this is what Washington did and that's why Blatche was a good over there, but now with veterans around him he's playing much better. Also talked about how Woodson is tougher on JR Smith (and we see this with other teams too - Pop with Parker etc) because he sees that Smith is very talented but needs to learn good habits and to play good team basketball. Smith in turn attributed his improved play largely to Woodson's faith in him.
Compare this to our coach, who gives everyone the green light, who lets everyone dribble the ball up the court, who is best buds with Cousins instead of coaching him and demanding true star level performance from Cuz. Keith Smart has repeatedly said there are no stars on our team - so much for faith in your talent.
jcassio
Starter
The article is an interesting read, but it's also a classic case of an article written to create drama rather than to report on real drama.
IT did deserve to come into this season as our starting PG, but he played poorly - making lots of mistakes (although his shooting was the best on the team in the early going). So I wasn't opposed to giving Brooks a chance to start and have IT be a spark plug off the bench. But now we've seen with our own eyes that Brooks has the same one-on-one tendencies as Evans, and now we're overloaded with one-on-one instincts instead of team ball. My preference is to trade Brooks - who does have some value - and give the ball to IT. When IT's not on the court, you've still got good ball handlers in Evans and Salmons, and an improving Jimmer. Now... what can we get by packaging Brooks with one or two other Kings...
IT did deserve to come into this season as our starting PG, but he played poorly - making lots of mistakes (although his shooting was the best on the team in the early going). So I wasn't opposed to giving Brooks a chance to start and have IT be a spark plug off the bench. But now we've seen with our own eyes that Brooks has the same one-on-one tendencies as Evans, and now we're overloaded with one-on-one instincts instead of team ball. My preference is to trade Brooks - who does have some value - and give the ball to IT. When IT's not on the court, you've still got good ball handlers in Evans and Salmons, and an improving Jimmer. Now... what can we get by packaging Brooks with one or two other Kings...
Section 101
All-Star
IT's father's brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate is a good source?
Section 101
All-Star
Hadlowe
Starter
Brooks and Evans were working okay as a backcourt tandem, and particularly with Salmons. Without Evans, though, Brooks has been pretty bad. We got Brooks for a song in the off-season because we weren't being outbid by other squads. I would prefer Brooks to stay around to see if the chemistry between him and Tyreke was real.
If we're going to ship out a point guard for a difference maker at the 3 or 4, it's going to be Jimmer for salary reasons. That is, unless some other GM has such a crush on Thomas that they're willing to take Outlaw, Salmons, or Garcia just to get him. With IT's assist to t/o ratio this season and his bad defensive stats, he isn't the value that he was at the end of last season.
This is a Kings board right? If we talk about reading a twitter from someone's brother, does that make us a "source close to Kings players" as well?
Ferris, is that you?
L
LWP777
Guest
How could a team not start a guy named Isaiah Thomas at PG? Only the Kings would do something like that!
HereWeBoogie
Hall of Famer
I noticed the team actually had some offense going when thomas was in last night. He and Cuz kept running pic n rolls.
Kingster
Hall of Famer
Maybe Cousins' t-shirt is a better source. I don't really know...
Glenn
Hall of Famer
I slowed down and wasn't exactly sure who was thinking what. The shot of Cuz wearing IT's jersey was just silly and I wouldn't read more into than that. I'm amazed the jersey didn't tear.
BTW, the Santa Cuz video and the shot of him wearing IT's jersey is the side of Cuz that makes me defend him. He's a good guy with an out of control temper. Not so easy to change, BTW.
I slowed down and wasn't exactly sure who was thinking what. The shot of Cuz wearing IT's jersey was just silly and I wouldn't read more into than that. I'm amazed the jersey didn't tear.
BTW, the Santa Cuz video and the shot of him wearing IT's jersey is the side of Cuz that makes me defend him. He's a good guy with an out of control temper. Not so easy to change, BTW.
Yep. And unfortunately, the league is not doing him any favors. The fouls they let go on him offensively and the stuff he gets called for defensively is absolutely pitiful. It was great to see him hold his composure last night with how many BS calls when against him last night
Bricklayer
Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Isn't Bruski the rabid IT fan from over at the other site?
I amended the title of the "article." It's misleading to make a blanket statement. Kings players are not going to come out and publicly express their preference for one player over another. I've been a fan of this team since 1985 and I cannot recall even one instance where that has happened.
Bruski, by the way, is the blogger who wrote the article abut NBA owners being forced to choose between Sacramento and the Maloofs. He writes a fair amount about the Kings but also about the NBA in general.
Bruski, by the way, is the blogger who wrote the article abut NBA owners being forced to choose between Sacramento and the Maloofs. He writes a fair amount about the Kings but also about the NBA in general.
bajaden
Hall of Famer
To verify what your saying about Smart. Jimmer, along with IT and now Brooks, has the reputation of being a chudker, or a, just shoot if if you've got it PG. I disagree with that for various reasons I won't go into right now, but the last two times I heard Smart say anything critical of Jimmer, is that he didn't shoot the ball enough. That he had the adacity to actually pass the ball instead of shooting it. So why are we surprised when both Jimmer and IT shoot the ball a lot. Its because they're being told to shoot the ball a lot.
I saw both Jimmer and IT play a lot in college, and I wouldn't call either of them pass first PG's, but both were very capable of running an offense, and trying to get everyone involved. And in both cases, both usually started taking shots when no one else on their team could make a shot, which on Jimmers team was almost every game. I think Jimmer has a little better court vision than IT does, but I think both can run an offense, if given an offense to run. I do agree with Van Gundy on letting your proven stars have the freedom to freelance, but you certainly don't give that privilige to the Outlaws and Johnsons of the world.
Last edited:
Another basketball article coming from what I suspect as a stupid midget fan of midget players.
I could certainly understand that we all want to see midgets thriving very well in the NBA. It's like watching the circus (or sometimes seeing ourselves on the performer). We all want to see the freaks do mind-boggling things that they aren't supposed to be doing. Also, we want to see underdogs winning in games and in this case it is IT trying to prove a 5' 9" PG can be an awesome starter in NBA.
But will it really translate to being a winning team, or playoff team, and ultimately a championship team?
Come on now. We all know we are trying to build a winning team and when I say a winning team, not just a team that will win a few games and then fade comes playoff time. If we want to win it all, we should have a full-sized line-up that can match other elite team's full-sized line-up. It would be a waste of time trying to develop a 5' 9" player as our starter. He will just be eaten alive by the much bigger PGs of the elite teams comes playoff time.
This is basketball and not a ping-pong game.
Common sense.
I could certainly understand that we all want to see midgets thriving very well in the NBA. It's like watching the circus (or sometimes seeing ourselves on the performer). We all want to see the freaks do mind-boggling things that they aren't supposed to be doing. Also, we want to see underdogs winning in games and in this case it is IT trying to prove a 5' 9" PG can be an awesome starter in NBA.
But will it really translate to being a winning team, or playoff team, and ultimately a championship team?
Come on now. We all know we are trying to build a winning team and when I say a winning team, not just a team that will win a few games and then fade comes playoff time. If we want to win it all, we should have a full-sized line-up that can match other elite team's full-sized line-up. It would be a waste of time trying to develop a 5' 9" player as our starter. He will just be eaten alive by the much bigger PGs of the elite teams comes playoff time.
This is basketball and not a ping-pong game.
Common sense.
Last edited:
Gonna go crawl in my midget hole.
Now you're just making stuff up!!!
Yeah because we don't anymore.
Similar threads
- Locked
