Kings/Pacers/Cavs

Smills91

Starter
Kings deal:
Mike Bibby

Kings receive:
Jeff Foster
Eric Snow
Shawne Williams
Pacers 2009 1st rounder

Pacers deal:
Jeff Foster
Jamaal Tinsley
Shawne Williams
2009 1st rounder

Pacers receive:
Mike Bibby

Cavs deal:
Eric Snow

Cavs receive:
Jamaal Tinsley

Why for Kings...we add depth at PG/C and get contracts that expire in two years(no added length) and add a young SF and get a pick for the future. Foster improves our Rebounding and Snow would become a team leader IMO.

Why for Pacers...they turn spare parts into Mike Bibby and ditch Tinsley off the roster.

Why for the Cavs....talent upgrade.
 
Kings deal:
Mike Bibby

Kings receive:
Jeff Foster
Eric Snow
Shawne Williams
Pacers 2009 1st rounder

Pacers deal:
Jeff Foster
Jamaal Tinsley
Shawne Williams
2009 1st rounder

Pacers receive:
Mike Bibby

Cavs deal:
Eric Snow

Cavs receive:
Jamaal Tinsley

Why for Kings...we add depth at PG/C and get contracts that expire in two years(no added length) and add a young SF and get a pick for the future. Foster improves our Rebounding and Snow would become a team leader IMO.

Why for Pacers...they turn spare parts into Mike Bibby and ditch Tinsley off the roster.

Why for the Cavs....talent upgrade.

It's not enough of a talent upgrade (we are talking jamaal tinsley here) for them to take on his horrible contract. I think it's got like 4-5 years left on it. Cavs don't do this.
 
It's not enough of a talent upgrade (we are talking jamaal tinsley here) for them to take on his horrible contract. I think it's got like 4-5 years left on it. Cavs don't do this.

I don't think Cavs fans are as opposed to it as you say. Snow really can't ball anymore.
 
At this point, I have to wonder if Smills91 is operating off the "infinite monkeys at typewriters" theory of trade proposals.

;)
 
I don't think Cavs fans are as opposed to it as you say. Snow really can't ball anymore.

Did I say cavs fans would be opposed to it? I'm not talking about Snow, I admitted Tinsley is a better player than him but willingly taking on Tinsley's contract like that is not smart.
 
Cavs need a shooter, not a Jamaal Tinsley for the most njury prone backcourt in the NBA. Given Hughes relative successat the PG, they may in fact be looking for a long bombing shooting guard rather than PG -- which makes our inability to get that deadline deal consummated more frustrating.
 
Back
Top