[Game] Kings @ Magic 23 Feb 1900 EST

#94
If you're going to attempt a fast break with 1:24 left, convert the basket. I'd have rather played the clock in that situation but whatever. I'm shocked and amazed that we're up by 4.
 
#96
As much as I dislike Head, this is working, let's not mess with it. I don't think Taylor would be as good defending Nelson and the Kings need to hide Beno on Redick (why that guy is in the game and not richardson is a mystery, though).
 
I wonder if the Magic announcers are ever going to give the Kings any credit whatsoever. Newsbreak for you guys: Your team is SOFT!

Dagger! By Luther Head of all people, amazing!
 
Wait, so if the OKC game was undeniable proof that Tyreke is the only difference between competing and getting blown out every night, what does this game prove?...
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
Wait, so if the OKC game was undeniable proof that Tyreke is the only difference between competing and getting blown out every night, what does this game prove?...
Don't forget that Cousins had a sub-par game as well. Might as well ship them both out and begin the Luther Head era.
 
Wait, so if the OKC game was undeniable proof that Tyreke is the only difference between competing and getting blown out every night, what does this game prove?...
Maybe that, whenever everybody actually works his *** off on defense and they actually manage to run a few plays and limit the amount of forcing, they actually have a shot at competing with good teams. It also proves that when the Magic don't hit their threes, Howard is not enough (single coverage against him worked beautifully, imo).