MizzouKing
Starter
I like their list better…
I like their list better…
If the Kings are serious about a playoff run neither Jackson or Barnes should be playing/coaching the teamMost have probably seen this but if not…also I wonder if Barnes has been consulted at all regarding Mark.
If the Kings are serious about a playoff run neither Jackson or Barnes should be playing/coaching the team
This whole fiasco screams cheap to me.Carmichael Dave just said on his show it’s down to 2. Brown and Jackson.![]()
Carmichael Dave just said on his show it’s down to 2. Brown and Jackson.![]()
EXORCISMS FOR EVERYONE LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Fox doesn’t have the fire, and will never have that fire. He is who he is.
As Bleacher Report’s Jake Fischer noted on Tuesday, there is indeed a strong sense from sources close to the situation that Jackson is the preferred candidate of Kings owner Vivek Ranadive. But the Kings insist there’s a level playing field, and that second-year general manager Monte McNair will be given the leeway to make the final decision.
Considering Ranadive denied Joe Dumars’ attempt to become McNair’s new front office boss this week before his exit to the league office, there is recent evidence that the Kings owner is showing internal support for his GM. Only time will tell if that is the case with this hire.
This is the main thing I just cannot for the life of me square with Jackson even interviewing. If there is one candidate that would directly contradict much of the diversity/community efforts that the organization has taken over the past couple years (and they have clearly stuck their necks out ahead of the pack on much of this) it would be Jackson. I understand people can change and grow; however, Jackson is a pastor and I would expect that many of his views are deeply held. It would be such a head scratching decision from a PR perspective.On the sidelines, if they hire Jackson they might as well save their breath on Pride celebrations, and all the other diversity-related outreach events…the Kings will have lost all credibility hiring an outspoken homophobe.
On the hoops front, I don’t see a lot of upside for either side. If he gets torched here his hopes of future coaching gigs are over.
This is the main thing I just cannot for the life of me square with Jackson even interviewing. If there is one candidate that would directly contradict much of the diversity/community efforts that the organization has taken over the past couple years (and they have clearly stuck their necks out ahead of the pack on much of this) it would be Jackson. I understand people can change and grow; however, Jackson is a pastor and I would expect that many of his views are deeply held. It would be such a head scratching decision from a PR perspective.
I'm not surprised at all we also employ Matt Barnes and Josh Jackson.This is the main thing I just cannot for the life of me square with Jackson even interviewing. If there is one candidate that would directly contradict much of the diversity/community efforts that the organization has taken over the past couple years (and they have clearly stuck their necks out ahead of the pack on much of this) it would be Jackson. I understand people can change and grow; however, Jackson is a pastor and I would expect that many of his views are deeply held. It would be such a head scratching decision from a PR perspective.
It's pure conspiracy theory but I'm sticking to my belief that Jackson keeps advancing to get us doing our homework and embracing Brown's positives until the day Jackson is named coach.
Seems appropriate for a franchise that is Running on Empty to come down to a Jackson/Brown decision.
Did you see that “scathing” report on the bee this morning???? I totally agree Jackson is not my choice and he never has been. I know you can’t believe everything you read BUT Vivek needs to make at least one just one smart decision and move on from Jackson for sure. Oh yes, I forgot I’m talking about Vivek …SMFHThis is the main thing I just cannot for the life of me square with Jackson even interviewing. If there is one candidate that would directly contradict much of the diversity/community efforts that the organization has taken over the past couple years (and they have clearly stuck their necks out ahead of the pack on much of this) it would be Jackson. I understand people can change and grow; however, Jackson is a pastor and I would expect that many of his views are deeply held. It would be such a head scratching decision from a PR perspective.
This is just a thing a lot of secular sports fans don't like to admit to themselves but a very, very large percent of the athletes they cheer for have some pretty deeply held religious beliefs. It's not uncommon to see half a team in a pre-game prayer circle.I’d venture to guess a fairly high percentage of players share Mark’s perspective.
This is just a thing a lot of secular sports fans don't like to admit to themselves but a very, very large percent of the athletes they cheer for have some pretty deeply held religious beliefs. It's not uncommon to see half a team in a pre-game prayer circle.
I don't care for his brand but I'm far more concerned about the Xs and Os aspect and I don't see Jackson as an upgrade to anything we've had since before Vivek got here. Coincidentally about the last time Jackson actually coached in the league.
I honestly care less about his personal religious beliefs, they are his and should not be called into question. The issue is bringing them into the locker room and forcing group prayers (zero problem of prayers with his staff and players which are voluntary). My issue is his dreadful treatment of other staff (fighting with assistant coaches and FO officials) his willful dereliction of duty (allowing mike malone to be the de facto coach while he remained the face), and his disregard for proper medical treatment (holy water instead of medicine, rest and therapy for steph).
Additionally, people here keep mentioning he started the turn around for the warriors which is only partially true. There was a clear upswing in talent when the reigns were given to steph (over monta ellis) and tge drafting of Klay. BUT this was the guy who ran the offense through Bogut (who himself was never an amazing offensive player) and kept starting and sticking with David Lee (a career defensive black hole) in over a young Dramond (first major changes made by Kerr which propelled the team forward.
If you remember correctly, it was the Warriors front office who dealt Ellis for Bogut to (1) put the ball in Steph's hands more and (2) allow Klay to start at SG. Basically, that trade forced Mark Jackson into the Warriors' Splash Brothers backcourt.
I'm not a fan of Mark Jackson for a few reasons, but just strictly from a basketball sense, he made poor decisions the last time he was a coach, and he hasn't been in that position for nearly a decade. I just don't see the appeal. But it's Vivek, so it will probably happen.