Yeah, one: how is it possible to be so wrong, in under eighty words?
Not playing a guy under contract is not treating them "like crap." Sorry, but you're just wrong about that. Jimmer Fredette has access to the best medical and dental benefits money can buy, nutritionists, personal trainers, world-class training facilities, to work on his game. He also has the opportunity to practice against some of the best basketball players in the world, learn from professional basketball coaches, and see parts of the country that two-thirds of the population will never see in their lives. Oh, and by the way, he's making two and a half million dollars! If that's being "treated like crap," then sign me the **** up. You make it sound like he works in a coal mine, or something.
This is a total non sequitur. The second part of this sentence is not a logical conclusion of the first part.
Well, they're both better defenders, and significantly better rebounders, so they've got that going for them. They've also both got a higher ceiling, and will be better players at the three-year mark in their career than Fredette is at his, if they even scratch the surface of their potential.
This is, at best, personal opinion, and closer to wishful thinking.
This is the only part of your post that is not either completely wrong, or a slanderous lie.
Define "shut out." He's been given one hundred seventy-one games to show what he can do, including seventy-three percent of the season-to-date. Management has determined that they either don't need, or can do without, what he does. He isn't owed any additional playing time, and it's not mistreatment to not give him any.
