Keep in mind that George Maloof used the logic that since he is a tenant, he shouldn't pay for pre dev costs.
Yet, as a "tenant" he he asking for all kinds of power over the design and additional revenue streams such as HALF of the naming rights revenue (he's already getting that), revenue/control over signage, and other revenue streams that no "tenant" has ever received.
Every other owner obviously must be thinking that George Maloof is insane. Not to mention they are ashamed he's part of their club.
As KJ mentioned, the deal on the table is a deal that every other owner would jump at the chance to take, and that's likely BEFORE the NBA agreed to front the entire Maloof portion of the cost.
I'd love to have a finance person break down what the actual annual cost of playing at the new arena would be with the lease payments + the loan payments back to the NBA for the 67mil. Then, add up projections of what their revenue would be compared to where they are now. Basically, to run the numbers as if you are the Maloofs, and then share them with the public. I'm sure the city and/or the NBA has done this. They know the exact details according to the best projections that can be made. If it stands that the Maloofs would stand to increase in yearly net profit simply by moving into the new arena, their leverage for getting support from other owners for a move would take a severe hit, not that there's any support left at this point anyway. It's just good to be able to see the numbers.