Kenny Thomas

Mozart

G-League
Any questio<slap>, um, I mean, I have a question:


WTF is he on the team, much less playing lame minutes?


WTF?


The Jones signing could mean the exit of KT, yes?


Let's all waive (pun intended) him good bye and have the door hit him in his sorry arse on his way out. I'm done with Mr Pouty.
 
No the new signing isn't meant to replace him. The new guy is to replace Martin in an emergency.

Of course Kenny is useless but how do you get rid of him? He has a contract that binds the Kings to pay him an awful lot until the summer of 2010. He is not obligated to allow a buy out that saves the Kings any money and would be foolish to allow a buy out.

Certainly he has no trade value. Wanting him gone does not make him go away, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
It would seem that Managment (such that it is) does not want to buy Kenny out so the ONLY chance they have to trade him with out packaging him with an under paid player of value like Cisco is to play him and hope some GM out there will be desperate for a PF who can rebound. But if you sit Kenny then there is NO chance at all to trade him. Of course some of have been saying there was no chace of trading him ever since GP's brillinat move to bring him here in the Webber deal.:rolleyes:
 
No the new signing isn't meant to replace him. The new guy is to replace Martin in an emergency.

Of course Kenny is useless but how do you get rid of him? He has a contract that binds the Kings to pay him an awful lot until the summer of 2010. He is not obligated to allow a buy out that saves the Kings any money and would be foolish to allow a buy out.

Certainly he has no trade value. Wanting him gone does not make him go away, unfortunately.

That might not be true. Basic logic would tell you that he should just sit and wait to get all of the money in his contract. But accepting a buy-out would not be the worst idea for him and here is why.

First, Kenny is 30 years old. By the time his contract is up, he will be what? 32? 33? And he will have not played enough up to that point to get a decent contract. I can't think of a team that would pay him the MLE, maybe the LLE. And that is for what?...the rest of his career?

If he takes a buy-out, he could sign with another team who would have to pay 0 or very little for him. Then he could use that team as a catalyst to get another contract, maybe even more than an MLE.

I think this idea was discussed at the beginning of the year...let Kenny rot on the bench until he accepts a buy-out. Cheaper for us, smarter for him.


Lets say he stays for the rest of this year and gets really pissed off and tells his agent to talk to GP. For the next two years we will owe Kenny just over $17M. Say he accepts a buy-out of $10M. So he leaves $7M on the table...why would he do that? Well he could go out next year, sign with a team for the league min or something, and find a way to get playing time to raise his value. Then he could go out and get another contract or two that would net him more money than if he stays here, keeps the $7M, and fails at getting anything other than an LLE. At some point, there will be a # that he could accept for a buyout that will benefit both him and us.

And depending on the person, money isn't everything. Maybe Kenny wants to play basketball and would be willing to take a paycut to do so. Who knows.

I am not a professor on the subject, so if I botched up some of the details, anyone please feel free to correct me.
 
Lets say he stays for the rest of this year and gets really pissed off and tells his agent to talk to GP. For the next two years we will owe Kenny just over $17M. Say he accepts a buy-out of $10M. So he leaves $7M on the table...why would he do that? Well he could go out next year, sign with a team for the league min or something, and find a way to get playing time to raise his value. Then he could go out and get another contract or two that would net him more money than if he stays here, keeps the $7M, and fails at getting anything other than an LLE. At some point, there will be a # that he could accept for a buyout that will benefit both him and us.

Buyout is usually 90% of the contract. So the Maloofs have to pay around $21 millions (this season + next two) to make KT leave. Then Petrie still has to sign another big body to replace KT (even if Justin takes over KT's mins, we still need that insurrance big man with SAR disabled.). And there's no guarantee that you can find a cheap big guy who is as good as KT. So why bother?

The best case scenario is to package KT in a trade with Bibby or Artest. I think that's what GP is banking on.
 
. Of course some of have been saying there was no chace of trading him ever since GP's brillinat move to bring him here in the Webber deal.:rolleyes:

All I remember is Petrie saying how much flexibility it would give the Kings when they got him for Webb. Skinner got moved for nothing, Corliss never did get traded and finally retired, and Kenny....well he's still here. Sounds like Geoff's spin was trying to convince himself. We're as bad as we've been since that trade was made. Never did get any better. Only worse.
 
Best case scenario

The best case scenario is to package KT in a trade with Bibby or Artest. I think that's what GP is banking on.


That's what I'm thinking. Is there a website that has the contract information of each player on the team? I checked the Kings' website and don't see it, unless I missed it.
 
Back
Top