Chupacabra
Starter
there are a lot of new players. Im sure he is experimenting with different combinations of players. We are not a good team. We can afford to experiment.
You have the perfect avatar for your response.No, he didn't. Check Zbo's gamelog. Zbo played 68 games and started 53 of them. The games he came off the bench were in December and January for reasons I wouldn't know, after which he went back to starting and playing 30-35 minutes all the way to end of the season.
Except for reaching the playoffs in every season and coaching the Grizzlies through some hard fought series.
From my point of view Joerger altered the Grizzlies playstyle quite a bit after Hollins. Where Hollins ran a pretty stagnant post offense with some high low plays, Joerger gradually increased the amount of pick and rolls every year and relied more on horn plays. Conley really grew into the player he is know under Joerger.
I understand some of the criticism. Im not a fan of the current Kings offense. I also think Joerger has a tendency to be loyal to a fault towards certain core players.
But the dude knows a thing or two about coaching defense and is a decent overall Nba coach.
Let's not get carried away, because our young players failed miserably against a good Wizards team.
Yeah, and the truth is that them getting blasted could be a good learning experience. Now it's about how they respond and their ability to bounce back. Young players get better by failing, if they don't, then they never will so waiting to find out just makes it harder for the organization i.e. see almost any Kings draft pick post Cuz.
And for some of them it's a strange and new experience. They didn't get to the NBA by failing. You have to balance the need for them to learn those lessons with the ability for them to absorb the lesson without losing confidence. Look at Quincy Douby.
No, but to think it doesn't have any weight is lunacy.Do you believe these stats equal automatic overall ranking?
I'd personally put Wall 3rd as well behind Westbrook and Curry. Probably tied for 3rd with Conley, CP3, Irving.
Lol at Lower being 3rd. No way.
Those stats (specifically RAPM) are supposed to do a good job at accounting for many variables because it doesn't assign generic/arbitrary values to stats like points, rebounds, assists, steals, etc. It's supposed to account for their team's performance while controlling for his teammates and competition (something RPM & On/Off don't do a great job at). Variables such as a defender having to play a foot closer to his man because he's a good 3pt shooter are factored in, things like hedging screens effectively are factored in, things like setting solid hard screens are factored in, things like picking up your man full court and giving your opponent 15s to get into their set are factored in, & even things like the way your misses come off the rim that could potentially give your team a better chance at an offensive board are factored in.Stats are only one way to judge a player comparison there are alot of variables. Take those players on your list and have an expansion type draft wall probably goes 4th behind irving but could easily go 5th behind Conley or Lillard.
Agree with you on Bogdan. It's hard to crown him after only a few games but I'm getting ready to.Might be the first time in Fox's career that he faced a player that was as fast as he was, and stronger to boot. Good experience for him. Now he has a measuring stick to go by. I'm very impressed with Bogdan. He may be the best player on the team.
Well I think it would be too much to ask for a whole lot of guys, who have/had the opportunity to coach in the NBA.![]()
If you don't have anything to back up your statements, that's fine, but don't expect to be unchallenged.The only thing funnier than stat geeks in basketball are pretentious stat geeks.
The only thing funnier than stat geeks in basketball are pretentious stat geeks.
you're kidding, right?
are you really going to show this chart and say with a straight face Wall isn't a top 3 PG? He will make a case for MVP this season IMO, just you wait and see. Washington is destined to go deep in the postseason.
you're kidding, right?
are you really going to show this chart and say with a straight face Wall isn't a top 3 PG? He will make a case for MVP this season IMO, just you wait and see. Washington is destined to go deep in the postseason.
Not kidding at all. Wall is not a top 3 PG. I've given my supporting evidence as to why in the post you quoted and in two other replies above. Feel free to challenge that stance if you would like. I'm curious to see why you think he is a top 3 PG.
Personally, I'd put Wall at number 2, right behind Steph.
Agree with you on Bogdan. It's hard to crown him after only a few games but I'm getting ready to.
As for Fox, I thought he played good defense on Wall. I only recall Wall getting by him once which resulted in a kickout to Porter for a three. And there was one other time that Fox should have closed out quicker which resulted in Wall hitting a three. Everything else was for the most part contested. Wall just happened to be on fire with his jumpshot that game.
Regarding Wall, he's a monster on offense and defense, except in the closing minutes of games when his team really needs a closer. If the Wizards really want to vie for a championship Wall has to take the next step and be that closer; otherwise they need to find another guy on that team to be the closer.
For starters, he plays on both ends.
Second, when he doesn't play for Washington, they are a lottery team.
Third, He's improved his shooting every year he's been in the league and now that he has a three ball part of his repertoire, forget about it.
Tell me, if you don't think he's top 3, who are your top 3 PGs?
Beal and Buddy are 6 months apart in age
That's precisely what the stats I posted are supposed to do. They are supposed to measure ones impact on the game, his contribution to winning, etc. but let's not pretend like I'm only leveraging stats. Watching the games and advanced stats go together. Omitting one can leave you more susceptible to error.The impact Wall has on his team can't be told solely by looking at the numbers. I mean, you could, but it won't tell the whole story. If you simply watch the game with the naked eye and stats aside, you see the team is night and day with/without him.
You can find all of those stats online. They represent last season.Where did you get those numbers? What games do they represent?
I was just thinking about this yesterday but was thinking of Cauley-Stein in the same context as well. I wouldn't mind trying to make a deal for Anunoby if we don't see more out of these two.Beal and Buddy are 6 months apart in age
He CAN play on both ends but his lack of defensive impact says he doesn't do it consistently.
What data do you have to back up your 2nd point? Not doubting it but I'm sure you have some evidence to back up such a claim.
Not sure where you got this from. He hasn't improved every year. He's improved since coming into the year but his longe range shooting is still one of his weaknesses.
View attachment 6907
Curry, Westbrook, & Paul.
That's precisely what the stats I posted are supposed to do. They are supposed to measure ones impact on the game, his contribution to winning, etc. but let's not pretend like I'm only leveraging stats. Watching the games and advanced stats go together. Omitting one can leave you more susceptible to error.