I've read more comments than I intended to about this (not here - on Twitter, RealGM, other boards etc) and lots of people are throwing out the 2nd Amendment, whether Ja was in a state that allowed open carry, why this is any different than an athlete taking a picture while hunting, personal freedoms etc.
Let's just sidestep the politics and legality here. The reality is that he's hurting the NBA's image and it's brand, and that equates to a lot of money.
Had this happened in isolation, it'd be a bad look and the NBA would likely talk to him about it privately. But given that it comes on the heels of the Grizzlies and the NBA doing everything they could as damage control after a much more serious incident (flashing a gun in a public place while apparently under the influence) as well as other off the court allegations and you have to imagine the Memphis front office and NBA league office are incredulous at this point.
This isn't about what is legal or not. It's about blatantly doing exactly what your employer told you not to do.
Let's just sidestep the politics and legality here. The reality is that he's hurting the NBA's image and it's brand, and that equates to a lot of money.
Had this happened in isolation, it'd be a bad look and the NBA would likely talk to him about it privately. But given that it comes on the heels of the Grizzlies and the NBA doing everything they could as damage control after a much more serious incident (flashing a gun in a public place while apparently under the influence) as well as other off the court allegations and you have to imagine the Memphis front office and NBA league office are incredulous at this point.
This isn't about what is legal or not. It's about blatantly doing exactly what your employer told you not to do.
In theory, Ja and every other player have the right to express themselves on their social media platforms however they see fit. However those expressions can and often do incur consequences. Because the NBA and every other employer have the right to let their employees know that they believe the individuals expression is in conflict with their own interests and further have the right to take appropriate action according to their own guidelines and rules and, of course, what's permitted under the law.
Already knowing what the outcome was a few months ago when he did the same thing, repeating the action is quite alarming to say the least. Flippant and tone deaf immediately comes to mind.