No, moving DMC for a rental is throwing in the towel. Its the type of cynical move that kept us shooting for an 8 seed instead of rebuilding the franchise when it was evident that the magic was gone. It's why we are in the friggin mess we are in now. It's why we lost Adelman (yeah, they fired him, but with the rosters they were assembling the records were just going to get worse and it would have ended even worse, at least he went out a winner who was rudely dumped by the Maloofs).
We caught lightning in a bottle with Webber. I don't see it repeating in our current shape. There's no Vlade like leadership or J-Will every night is a sportscenter top 10 player on this team.
Webber was traded to Sacramento in 1998 and re-signed in 2001 (with a contending team built around his talents). There's no reasonable comparison between that and 55 games of Dwight Howard on a lotto team.
That article is terrible. Awful writing, amazes me that people actually get paid good money for writing such slop.
Maybe we should research all of the articles about when DMC clashed with coaches and teammates too. Perhaps we'd be on to something.
History isn't repeating itself for only one of the parties involved. Just saying.
What are you talking about? He was saying that someone with Vet/Star power might bring in more ticket sales. How are the two associated? By rent they mean most likely to buy out the rest of his contract, which is about 18 mil?
No he means that Howard won't resign with the Kings, so we would be trading Cousins for a one year, or whats ever left of this season for a rental of Howard. Which by the way isn't going to happen. The Kings aren't going to trade Cousins. Period!
By the way, great job Sec 101! I had read just about everyone of these articles at the time we hired Westphal, which was why I have serious reservations about him from the the get go. I was too lazy to go back and find them again. Once again, great job. This guy needs to be exposed.
On the one hand, this is interesting. On the other, any coach with a significant amount of time in the league playing with players of all sorts of temperments is going to have negative articles written about them and their style. I'm sure articles on par with those listed exist for Jerry Sloan, Phil Jackson, etc. in significant numbers.
I don't really think it "clinches" anything other than Westphal's been around a while, and actually had some success with some pretty egotistical players (the Glove, Barkley).
I care little if PW stays around longer than this season, but I hope that his tactics work with Cousins as they did with Payton. Even if they don't and PW ends up to be a complete loser as most of you think, the DMC maturity issues are *going* to need to be solved by someone.
And I doubt they would. It doesn't hurt to look at hypotheticals, however. Especially when Westphal seems to have major support from the organization (although I'll take that for what it's worth), it's not hard to envision a situation where DMC just says, "he's done".
DMC is under contract, so he can't just say he's done. Make no mistake, Cuz wants to play. He didn't go home because he wanted to miss the game. He was sent home by Westphal. Westphal is on thin ice and he knows it. In Amicks article, when he was talking to Petire, he asked Petrie how he felt about the progress of the team. Petrie's response was, well, no one is happy with how things are going right now. Thats quite a response from Petrie. Certainly not an endorsement of Westphal.
No he means that Howard won't resign with the Kings, so we would be trading Cousins for a one year, or whats ever left of this season for a rental of Howard. Which by the way isn't going to happen. The Kings aren't going to trade Cousins. Period!
By the way, great job Sec 101! I had read just about everyone of these articles at the time we hired Westphal, which was why I have serious reservations about him from the the get go. I was too lazy to go back and find them again. Once again, great job. This guy needs to be exposed.
If he is undermining the progress of a potential franchise player out of some petty personality clash then yes, he needs to be "exposed".So you rip me for my criticism of DMC but now you're openly hoping that this man gets "exposed" and loses his job? Hypocrisy at it's finest sir!
http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-120101/daily-dime
Wow. From analysis on ESPN, it does not look good.
I'll take it for what it's worth since it's at my first glance. They suggest a "rental" of Dwight Howard...
I'm surprised that Kobe actually pulled him aside after the game and gave him advice.
But Jesus. ****storm.
If he is undermining the progress of a potential franchise player out of some petty personality clash then yes, he needs to be "exposed".
NOBODY thought PW was the coach to guide us to the promised land, at best he was going to provide some stability and allow the young players to grow in a fashion that a less experienced coach trying to "make his mark" (Theus) wouldn't do because he was so concerned with W/L vs. long term growth. PW has been around long enough to "know his role", except that apparently he hasn't, and Sec 101's digging shows just that. Ironically enough, now that the lingering vet talent is gone and the youth movement is in full swing, Theus may have just been able to do something with this lineup, if he could get them to overachieve the way he did with a lineup built to tank a season. Not that I ever would want to go back there.
So you rip me for my criticism of DMC but now you're openly hoping that this man gets "exposed" and loses his job? Hypocrisy at it's finest sir!
http://www.sbnation.com/nba/2012/1/2/2676173/demarcus-cousins-sacramento-kings-paul-westphal-hook
This piece by Ziller is the best explanation for why Westphal will never provide the development that Cousins needs.
I know most people balk at renting a star, but isn't that pretty much what they did with Chris Webber? it paid off in that case when he resigned. Not saying that's how it would play it with Howard, but who knows. Renting a star like Howard for a year could attract free agents that could lead to a turn around, just like last time. Not that I'm saying trade Cousins, I want to want to see him stay a King, I'm just pointing out that "renting" a star can often lead to better things, it's not a foregone conclusion that they'll just bail and sign with someone else.