this thread is sad....
first of all, nobody should be questioning IT's pure scoring ability. But grenade tossing threads like this lead people to over-react and retaliate, and even question THAT, which is just plain wrong. IT's offensive skills are there. He can create his own shot, and he can score in bunches. He is a real dynamo, and great fun to watch.... sometimes.
the problem is context.
IT is also at a disadvantage defending ANY player in the nba (and puts crappy effort on the D-side as well) ... and his biggest flaw *might be* that he is supposed to be the facilitator in this offense. If we had the "old" kings offense with vlade christie and webber, then IT might be able to function in teh offense as a bit of a score first gunner (but not at the rate he does so now, and we *still* have to return to the fact that IT's D is even worse than bibby's crappy D was... and by a long shot). But the fact is that the 2013-14 kings need their pg to actually run an offense.... and in spite of all his offensive abilities, IT just isn't well suited to that role.
so in the end he is a huge liability in basically all aspects on the D-side of the floor, and a player with some real pluses and some glaring minuses on the offensive side. That calculus shouldn't detract from his ofensive gifts, but does point to a problem of fit. but.....putting down some random stats and then backing up a non-thesis with a purely blind statement like "For all you size prejudiced people out there, the difference between 5'9" and 6'8" is 2.3 rebounds a game." shows some real-game ignorance.