Somehow, I expected you to come to this conclusion. People make leaps when arguments don't go their way.
I don't think the sarcasm was lost on you because you noted my cleverness, but in case it was, let me explain. Ripping Bibby for his bad defense is akin to ripping Peja for his non-existant post game or clutch play. I have no problem with doing it but in this context, it makes no sense. The argument here is (or at least the one I'm trying to make): who's doing more poorly in regards to their baseline?
Mediocrity from Bibby is not acceptable. But Peja isn't even at mediocrity yet. They're both playing crappy but Bibby's relative crappiness is at a lesser level than Peja's.
Now if you want to discuss each player's flaws and strengths as a whole, I'd be happy to bring in Bibby's lack of defense and Peja's lack of depth. But then this becomes a team building discussion, which wasn't the focus. Bibby's limitations and projected salary for the future are more to my tastes than Peja's. That's not to say I have any particular liking for Bibby's game because honestly, I'd be willing to shop both of them. But in a relative sense, there it is. But again, this is a different topic of discussion. We're talking about who's been doing worse this year and I disagree with the assessment that Bibby and Peja are equally disappointing. Peja has been significantly more disappointing.