[Grades] Grades v. Mavs 12/10/2012

King of awfulness tonight?

  • Marcus Thornton

    Votes: 12 35.3%
  • Thomas Robinson

    Votes: 7 20.6%
  • Jimmer Fredette

    Votes: 5 14.7%
  • Chuck Hayes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Travis Outlaw

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Isaiah Thomas

    Votes: 7 20.6%
  • James Johnosn

    Votes: 2 5.9%

  • Total voters
    34
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Woohoo! We bad. Literally.

The bench was just godawful tonight. Hideous. In a 23 pt loss there was still something to be said for the games of each of the 5 starters (less for Brooks, but still). Virtually nothing to be said for the games of ANY of the 7 benchers. Tough to win when you only have 5 guys on your team that night. Tougher still when the coach insists on playing 7 guys who aren't for nearly 40% of the minutes, including waiting to sub back in our big centerpiece until the lead was safely 20 again and there was no more hope.

So, since we either win or embarrass ourselves anymore, by rule more girls it will be. but I'll add in a few boys for the ladies, Slim's requested lady from last time...and just anything else I can come up with.

Boxscore

Stats: 30min 5pts (2-4, 1-2, 0-0) 3reb 7ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Salmons ( B- ) -- retreated back to his normal offensive production this game, but his spirit/focus on passing remained the same. Was having little if any effect on Mayo defenisvely int he early going, as as expected Mayo and Kaman kicked our butts in the first half. Did fire back with a couple of scores, but most of his positive impact this game once again came from his passing, and in particular repeatedly found Cisco open for standstill jumpers. Defense picked up on Mayo in the third during the only stretch of the game where the Kings played acceptable D, but did not lead to much. Was subbed out and never returned because Smart likes his scrubs to all feel good about themselves. Not at alla great performance, in fact neither terribly effective offensively or defensively. But unselfish, and that's such a huge job description he earns some grade here based on it alone.
claudia_lynx_04.jpg

Somebody called for Claudia Lynx.

Stats: 30min 11pts (5-8, 0-0, 1-4) 12reb 2ast 0stl 1blk 2TO
Thompson ( B- ) -- at no point a real factor, but solid, if erratic throughout. How is one solid but erratic? Well, that means that he came up with good plays on a pretty consistent basis, was our best rebounder, and seemed to be around a lot of plays for most of the night. But on the other hand, he was Jason, which means at any moment his hands and brain could have a short and he blew a number of easy/simple things we needed. Throw on continued helplessness whenever faced with Kaman -- this a career long problem -- and it wasn't a great night. Not bad, not great. Solid. He had a good block in the early going, got a little hoop with 4 minutes to go in the second quarter that was amazingly our first basket of the entire quarter. Added a little jumper in the ealy third as we tried to come back into it. But he also fumbled a critical rebound in the mid 3rd that cost us 2 points just as we were fighting and trying get over the hump and make it a single digit game, and bricked both FTs after he ended up on the line on a play where we should have had a dunk. There was good effort here, a solid performance, but he was less dependable than the numbers might suggest.
tamala-jones.jpg

And last time we fell on our face, vs. the Clippers, Slim was asking for Tamala Jones.

Stats: 35min 25pts (10-17, 0-1, 5-6) 6reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 4TO
Cousins ( B ) -- what we had here was a good game by Demarcus, and an efficient one. But not an impact game. It was a pretty one dimensional night, as Boogie and Kaman were just flat out better than anybody else inside and scored easily and often from pretty much wherever they wanted to, and there wasn't much that either of them could do, or even tried to do, to stop the other. Wasn't a need for anybody to get spectacular. Just play smoothly with skill and keep on scoring. More perimeter oriented than Boogie's recent games, but the jumper just kept falling and was lightly challenged, so why not. Well except for a baseline airball he threw up just before exiting in the early 2nd (yes, Smart actually rode a hot starter into the early 2nd, just before our awful bench blew us out). In the early going was doing some good work hustling for loose balls around the offensive glass -- but not in his normal fashion of chasing after his own forces (again besides oine wild shot that basically amounted to a pass to himself off the backboard). Instead was hustling and battling and poking stuff away off of other's misses, and being a factor on that end. On the other end...not so much. Was little defensive focus or energy form the beginning for us, from anybody, and Cuz and Kaman were just cruising around out there popping in jumpers. Had a few good passes setting Cisco up on draw and kicks, but as the game went along began to alos throw some real loose low percentage pass attempts trying to squeeze balls through holes that jsut were not there. In one of thoise Smart specials, got pulled wiht a couple of minute to go in the third with 23 points, and was not returned until the game was safely out of reach and we were down 20 at the 6 minute mark of the fourth. Which is just idiotic. Either return him when there is still a chance(it was hovering around 14 for a bit), or not at all. Now for Uncle Bricklayer's Ray of Sunshine: Over his last 4 games Demarcus Cousins is averaging 34.5min 21.5pts (.523 .815) 11.3reb 2.0ast 1.2stl 0.8blk 3.0TO and only 2.3Fl. Over his last 5 games Tyreke Evans is averaging 33.4min 21.4pts (.520 .455 .828) 4.4reb 4.8ast 1.4stl 1.0blk 2.4TO. Now, if we could just get both of those guys out on the floor playing like that together...that's the core of a winning team.
china-chow-picture-19.jpg

China Chow

Stats: 31min 25pts (9-16, 7-12, 0-0) 1reb 1ast 0stl 3blk 0TO
Garcia ( A- ) -- I should probably give Cisco a straight "A" on this on the same theory as Salmons' "A+" the other night -- at this late stage in his career he may never score 25pts again. In fact at NO point in his career has he ever hit 7 3ptrs in a single game -- this was the career long bombing night as he and Cousins carried us. The hesitation comes because that was pretty much all he did, and in fact what he was going to hit or not hit ont he night was very predictable. Basically every single time he played off theball, spotted up, got his feet set, it was going down. He was that hot all ngiht long. Every roleplayer spot up was basically automatic. On the other hand every time he got overexcited and forced things even a little bit, which was a few more times than we needed, it was a tough brick triggering Mavs runouts the other way. Made some dumb defensive errors on Damon Jones, who is his same age, but made him look like an octagenerian wiht his athleticism, blowing right by him to the hoop. Notched 1reb and 1ast in a Kevin Martin/Nick Young worthy boxscore effort. But boy was he hot from outside, and to the degree we tried to make any push at all after half, it was Cisco's shooting that was making up the ground. When Reke returns it will be interesting now. Will Smart notice all this success has been as a SG? The true roleplayerness of it all? Has MT lost his place so dramatically as to actually get bumped by Cisco? Or will will ignore the fact he's a SG and make him the backup SF since that spot appears completely open again, thus restorign the same SG posing as SF/no rebounds or ability to guard big SFs ever platoon we had last year and wanted so badly to improve? Whatever it will be, Cisco is one of the guys who's playing like he deserves time now.
MV5BNTUxNjc2NDY0OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDQzMzc5MQ@@._V1._SX640_SY800_.jpg

Nicole Paggi

Stats: 28min 9pts (3-8, 2-4, 1-1) 5reb 5ast 0stl 0blk 3TO
Brooks ( C ) -- weakest game of any of our 5 starters, but hey, at least he wasn't a bencher. *shudder* Got off to the wonderful start being scored over by Fisher then making it worse by fouling him on a three the next time down the floor. Outscored 5 to nothing by a 97yr old scrub 3 minutes into the game. But not surprisingly given Fisher's arthritis Brooks was able to fire back, culminatd by a stupid three from 27 feet out after both teams just went completely crazy, defending nothing and bombing practice threes on each other. Still not a terribly selfish game from him -- not sure he has had a double figure shot game since taking over as the starter. But seemed willing to randomly force things every few minutes. Was also giving us a surprisingly bit of help running back in for defensive boards. In the third absolutely killed us when he dribbled right into a crowd for a turnover after we had actually cut the elad all the way down to 11. The Mavs scooped it up, went the other way, and we never got as close again -- you could jsut sense that was the game. Was removed for IT two possessions later after Boogie and he added 2 more turnovers as we peed all over our own comeback and slammed the door in our own faces.
s_33842s_263807~adrian_paul_posters_opt.jpg

Adrian Paul -- see? Trying to be inclusive
 
Last edited:
01-abandon-hope-all-ye-who-enter-here-e1285714292550.jpg


Bench

Stats: 19min 10pts (3-6, 2-3, 2-2) 0reb 0ast 1stl 0blk 3TO
Thornton ( D ) -- tells you how bad it has been that this was effectively the GOOD game of his last four. Came in and the first thing he did was try to throw a no look pas to Cuz for a turnover. His first attempted jumper was forced right intot he teeth of Dahntay Jones' defense -- and btw despite his recent struggles, in this one you could clearly see the Mavs keying on him heavily while he was out there wiht the reserves. Oddly the remainder of our bench did not appear to scare them. Kept on trying real high degree of difficulty passes for no reason. Got a feather in his cap when he finally scored our very first point of the 2nd quarter at the 6:10 mark -- I kid you not, so bad were our reserves. In his late game there were mistakes and forces and offensive fouls, but maybe there was some sign of hope in that twice he was set up by IT for threes that he drained. Maybe hsi route back is just concentrating on off the ball stuff. Those threes against the Clippers were off the ball from Jimmer. The backdoor cuts with Hayes are off the ball. The threes tonight were off the ball from iT. Its been weeks since he's done much of anything successfully that wasn't off the ball. Now you just have to convince him of that.
Grace-Phipps.png

Grace Phipps

Stats: 12min 0pts (0-4, 0-0, 0-0) 3reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Robinson ( F ) -- these are the ones that are scary for TRob, because your #5 pick in the draft didn't even look like an NBA player last night. Had turnover problems again, and what happened to that streak a few weeks back where he, and we, had appeared to realize he could be efficient just playing off the ball and flying to the hoop for alley opps and whatnot using his athleticism? Now its back to him trying to create on his own with wild jumpesr and drives into traffic or inside attempts that get smushed, and in his last 10 games he's shooting .350. In his last five game its .176. Got called for a bogus offensive foul setting a screen when Collison just fell down and the refs did the normal NBA refs thing, that anytime anybody falls down somebody must have fouled them. Repeatedly blocked and swiped inside. And when Kaman came back in, TRob stood behind him and just no chance at all. Just can't stop a big center at all, and I don't see how that's going to change, which is a problem for frontcourt flexibility. Finally returned to start the 4th, but things did not get any more effective and was out for Cousins a few minutes later.
4092694_wallpapers_sexy_girls_374_68_bender777post.jpg

Florencia Salvioni -- Argentine model

Stats: 13min 2pts (1-4, 0-0, 0-0) 4reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Hayes ( D+ ) -- not the worst of our benchers, but when everybody else around him was awful, not the guy with the game to turn things himself either. Was just completely invisible in his first stint in the first half, where the benchers actually scored ZERO points while he was in there. Zero. Zilch. Tried to tip home a couple of wild misses by the guards, and had no better luck than they did. Came back in in the thrid, initially got a stop on Brand, but there was a rebound scrum, Brand got it back, and Hayes was not long enough to do anything but foul him for the +1. Had his one bright point of the night scoring on a series of 1 on 1 moves to begin the 4th, but those things are completely random and don't really help.
thumbnail.php

Jade Kelsall -- a Nevada beauty queen winner who got into some hot water for some sort of naughty picture or the other. Because nobody does that nowadays. Totally shocking and all that.

Stats: 8min 3pts (1-3, 0-1, 1-1) 1reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Fredette ( F ) -- looked terrible in his first half minutes and as the supposed PG a significant reason why we scored exactly 0 pts for the first 6 minutes of the 2nd quarter. Wild attempt off the drive, shaky ballhandling. Able to create nothing and so forcing and turning it over. Compounded it with more poor defense, including not even getting back effectively on the break. His second half minutes were taken by IT, which was barely an upgrade this timeout. Finally got back in for the final 3 minutes of garbagetime, and broke his goose egg with 15 seconds to go when he took a hard hit driving the baseline for a pointless layup.
tumblr_mdi6xncFUe1qlj5xio4_1280.jpg

Niall Matter
 
Last edited:
Stats: 6min 0pts (0-0, 0-0, 0-0) 1reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Outlaw ( INC ) -- completely predictably in Smartland, randomly came in in his old haunts in Portland and gave us a boost, so instantly gets elevated into the rotation to further jumble things. Just as predictably, went back to being Travis Outlaw and accomplishing nothing. Oh well, one more excuse to hang a pretty girl on.
190162.jpg

Marlene Mc'cohen

Stats: 16min 4pts (2-9, 0-4, 0-0) 3reb 4ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Thomas ( D ) -- just in for the final possesion of the first half, and so had no part in the debacle that began the 2nd quarter. But bunped up over the entire bench in the third when Brooks went out of control, and started making up for lost time in the incompetence race. May have had the backbreaker against us as he tried to finish through traffic on the break, got blocked, and the Mavs went down the other way and bombed a three on us to put us back down 18 going into the 4th. Just could not hit anything, as like Jimmer he was sitting on a goosegg (0-7) until the final minute of garbagetime. Then JJ spoonfed him a freebie on the break with a minute to go., and he added a final seconds layup on his own. Still just way too much of for IT in IT's game, but best thing he did on the ngiht was set Thornton up for two threes. Hope is dwindling, but I still am holding out a little that that PG/SG relationship can be rekindled effectively.
BeauDunn_featured.jpg

Beau Dunn

Stats: 12min 2pts (1-5, 0-0, 0-1) 4reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 0TO
Johnson ( D+ ) -- in for the first time to start the 4th and scored on a questionable +1, but barely drew iron with the FT and it was the only points he scored on the night. For the most part looked like he was playing his game, as much as he has a game, was trying to drive inside, focus on defense. Just wasn't very effective at anything. Have no reason to give him any worse grade than this, but also no reason for any better one.
Kathy_Ireland-hot-sexy-chicki-lovely-smoking-hot_thumb_585x795.jpg

Kathy Ireland -- from back in the day
 
Last edited:
BRILLIANT coaching. go back to the same exact thing that was a COMPLETE failure in the 2nd quarter of the Orlando game. STOP PLAYING 5 BENCH PLAYERS TOGETHER MORON!!!!!!

oh and guess what, he went back to it again to start the 4th. smh, this guy will never learn. fire this *** clown
 
BRILLIANT coaching. go back to the same exact thing that was a COMPLETE failure in the 2nd quarter of the Orlando game. STOP PLAYING 5 BENCH PLAYERS TOGETHER MORON!!!!!!

oh and guess what, he went back to it again to start the 4th. smh, this guy will never learn. fire this *** clown

Let's write a Kingsfans letter to Santa
 
It baffles me that Cousins doesn't touch the ball every single position because he doesn't have to always look to score, but he could help open things up for the shooters on the outside and too many times do you see him just standing at the three point line. I am beyond confused on how we want to use this guy...
 
i honestly think they will win 1 more game in December if we are lucky. the 3 game win streak was a total fluke. Toronto sucks and played terrible that day, Orlando sucks and was on the end of a long road trip, Portland just got back from a long road trip and had some injury problems and played like crap.
 
I actually dozed out in the second quarter but from what I saw of Jimmer I voted for him. I only woke back up near the end of the 3rd.

Fior some reason against some teams we are a matchup nightmare, but for other teams, including bad teams, we just don't bring it.
 
No defense ==> No running ==> No winning.

The team came out flat on D. I guess they thought they had "arrived" after winning three consecutive games. They could never make up the first quarter gap.

This didn't cause the loss, but I just can't believe that Smart put Jimmer on Beaubois. You've got to be kidding me. Sometimes I wonder if Smart has the ability to intuit anything. Smart must have repeated experiments before his obvervations finally lead to a conclusion. He has to see Jimmer, a not terribly quick guard, not be able to deal with Beaubois, a very quick guard, before he actually believes it. (Smart has said that he puts the guards in there according to matchup, but this Jimmer/Beaubois matchup totally contradicts that; it seems that Smart just alternates Jimmer and IT in each game, regardless of matchup).

Pure speculation on my part, but I really am not going to be surprised if IT ends up the starter on this team (again) before all is said and done. I know IT has had his down moments this year, but Brooks isn't exactly Mr. Consistent, and he's a veteran. I think it might take several more "experiments" though before Smart has enough empirical evidence to finally make the change.
 
It baffles me that Cousins doesn't touch the ball every single position because he doesn't have to always look to score, but he could help open things up for the shooters on the outside and too many times do you see him just standing at the three point line. I am beyond confused on how we want to use this guy...

How about that loss yesterday? I was about to put my fist through the wall. We could have been a game up on Pitt and we blew it. Dallas didn't beat us, we beat ourselves. This should have been a blowout. Dropped TDs and 3 dropped INTs....... ugh.. At least we didn't lose any ground. It still comes down to the Pitt game.
 
I don't know who to vote for. They were all garbage until garbage time.

Is it Chuck who's supposed to be our vet leader?

Is it IT who received the backup PG mins and was leading our offense when it imploded? He's also looking for his shot too much. One reason MT might be struggling is he can't get the ball from our PG's.

Outlaw, if you think he deserves more accountability after the Por game? When you play the way he did at Por then more is expected of you, and he fell flat on his face with those expectations. Could have left him in Por and not noticed his absence.

MT, who's supposed to be our go-to bench guy and scorer, who's in his 4th year, yet not only his missing shots, but is forcing poor shots and not helping elsewhere? TRob said the other day he focused on defense because that was what he needed to do to get mins. It's time MT contributed elsewhere when his shots aren't falling. I'm on the fence about giving Cisco MT's mins for the time being when Reke returns.

TRob? Only one with a legit excuse as he's just barely a month in to his career, but he is the 5th pick.

The biggest question I have is not about these guys playing so poorly, but rather playing them considerable mins and all at the same freakin time when they are playing poorly. Didn't Smart say two weeks ago he didn't want to play Reke more than about 36 mins because of empty mins? Then please, Smart, enlighten us as to why you kept that bench unit in when that 6 min stretch in the 2nd was the emptiest of mins I've seen in years, and our backup bigs producing more empty mins in the 4th kept Cuz on the bench while he was filling his mins with the most production of anyone tonight?
 
Last edited:
BTW, not sure if Sac telecast talked about this, but Cuz slapped Mayo in the nuts off the ball in the 2nd and Mayo was heated. That's after he clapped in Carlisles face and Carlisle had words with him.

Our leader cannot be acting this way.
 
BTW, not sure if Sac telecast talked about this, but Cuz slapped Mayo in the nuts off the ball in the 2nd and Mayo was heated. That's after he clapped in Carlisles face and Carlisle had words with him.

Our leader cannot be acting this way.

I dunno, might have been the only thing anybody on the kings did to slow Mayo all night. :p
 
BTW, not sure if Sac telecast talked about this, but Cuz slapped Mayo in the nuts off the ball in the 2nd and Mayo was heated. That's after he clapped in Carlisles face and Carlisle had words with him.

Our leader cannot be acting this way.

It's all over twitter right now. OJ Mayo saying that Demarcus has mental issues lol.
 
I voted MT for the simple reason that he is supposed to be our 3rd best player. -_-

its time to put him back in the starting lineup. or at least stop playing him in a lineup with 4 incapable offensive bench players. the defenses focus completely on him when hes on the floor, they give no respect to anybody else hes on the court with and its hurting his game
 
its time to put him back in the starting lineup. or at least stop playing him in a lineup with 4 incapable offensive bench players. the defenses focus completely on him when hes on the floor, they give no respect to anybody else hes on the court with and its hurting his game

Then why are we playing him with IT as opposed to Jimmer?
 
its time to put him back in the starting lineup. or at least stop playing him in a lineup with 4 incapable offensive bench players. the defenses focus completely on him when hes on the floor, they give no respect to anybody else hes on the court with and its hurting his game

And how exactly would we go about doing this. Unless we somehow convince David Stern to let us start 6 players as opposed to 5, I don't see any room for him in the starting line-up as opposed to who we currently have in there.
 
It's the offense thats hurting MT not the other players, when you've got the ball and look up and there's ZERO movement and everyone is just staring at you, what are you supposed to do?

Pass it to the guy next to you and rinse repeat.

Sorry but that isn't going to get it done.

I don't agree IT was "looking for his shot too much" last night, Ok the shots he took didn't fall, but at least 3 of his shots were right at the end of the shot clock, two were wide open threes and he had a driving layup blocked at the end of a quarter. Not sure what else he can do in these situations except pass up open looks and let the shot clock run out.

Even though Cisco had a "great" night, he took some awful shots that were basically turn overs, you do that a couple of times in a row and it's a 4 point swing. Games are about momentum at the end of the day.

And cuz definitely took a shot at Mayo IMO, looked at it a few times and it looks intentional to me. Lets hope the league isn't looking because a shot to the groin could easily be another suspension.

EDIT:

Here's the video of the Cuz incident with Mayo for those who haven't seen it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And cuz definitely took a shot at Mayo IMO, looked at it a few times and it looks intentional to me. Lets hope the league isn't looking because a shot to the groin could easily be another suspension.

EDIT:

Here's the video of the Cuz incident with Mayo for those who haven't seen it.


Pffft -- barely even rates a 1 on the Reggie Evans cheapshot scale. :p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow that was sneaky.

Not that I agree with what he did at all, but Mayo looks like he was being a pest there.
 
How about that loss yesterday? I was about to put my fist through the wall. We could have been a game up on Pitt and we blew it. Dallas didn't beat us, we beat ourselves. This should have been a blowout. Dropped TDs and 3 dropped INTs....... ugh.. At least we didn't lose any ground. It still comes down to the Pitt game.

The Bungles were in full effect yesterday, just like they were in San Diego with all those turnovers. They got away with it against the Chargers though but they always do this as you know. Get our hopes up, thinking they may make a run and then they lose at home against a Dallas team that is not that good to be honest. I am glad we play on Thursday night because we need to take care of business against Philly, but then again...the Bengals history against rookie QBs isn't always in their favor.
 
Wow that was sneaky.

Not that I agree with what he did at all, but Mayo looks like he was being a pest there.

We all know this kind of thing goes on in the paint 50 times a game, but this is cuz we're talking about.

Don't doubt the league takes a dim view of that "punch"
 
No defense ==> No running ==> No winning.

The team came out flat on D. I guess they thought they had "arrived" after winning three consecutive games. They could never make up the first quarter gap.

This didn't cause the loss, but I just can't believe that Smart put Jimmer on Beaubois. You've got to be kidding me. Sometimes I wonder if Smart has the ability to intuit anything. Smart must have repeated experiments before his obvervations finally lead to a conclusion. He has to see Jimmer, a not terribly quick guard, not be able to deal with Beaubois, a very quick guard, before he actually believes it. (Smart has said that he puts the guards in there according to matchup, but this Jimmer/Beaubois matchup totally contradicts that; it seems that Smart just alternates Jimmer and IT in each game, regardless of matchup).

Pure speculation on my part, but I really am not going to be surprised if IT ends up the starter on this team (again) before all is said and done. I know IT has had his down moments this year, but Brooks isn't exactly Mr. Consistent, and he's a veteran. I think it might take several more "experiments" though before Smart has enough empirical evidence to finally make the change.

while i am in absolute agreement with you regarding keith smart's penchant for poorly exploiting his matchups, or allowing himself to be exploited by the matchups, i still think you're crazy to insist that running is the only way this team will win. a team must play consistent defense to win consistently in this league, but again, running is supplemental to anything worthwhile that a team accomplishes, offensively speaking. the nba is, among many things, a game of attrition. in an 82-game season, who can play at a high level across the longest stretches, in the most important moments? who can create full-proof gameplans for every scenario? who can scout the opposition from top-to-bottom? who can coach their way out of a corner?

now, against the mavs last night, the kings biggest problem was simple: they could not stop their opponent from scoring. they made a little run in the second half, but, even with the momentum swinging in their direction, they allowed the mavs to squash it with superior execution. however, had the kings been able to stop the mavs more consistently, they still would not have had the advantage they enjoyed in their previous outings. against portland: 14 steals. against orlando: 11 steals. against the mavericks: 4 steals. there are gonna be games, particularly on road trips, back-to-backs, four-games-in-five-nights, etc., where a young team like the kings won't bring their best defensive effort, or simply won't be able to force turnovers against a disciplined veteran squad. in those games, there must be an out, there must be a path to victory...

in other words, there must be a disciplined gameplan--on both sides of the floor--that asks something more of its team than simply running up and down the court, because good teams, veteran teams seek to take that ability away. it is, in fact, the very first principle of winning basketball: limit an opponent's easy baskets by protecting the ball, keeping one's turnovers to a minimum, and hustling back in transition defense...
 
while i am in absolute agreement with you regarding keith smart's penchant for poorly exploiting his matchups, or allowing himself to be exploited by the matchups, i still think you're crazy to insist that running is the only way this team will win. a team must play consistent defense to win consistently in this league, but again, running is supplemental to anything worthwhile that a team accomplishes, offensively speaking. the nba is, among many things, a game of attrition. in an 82-game season, who can play at a high level across the longest stretches, in the most important moments? who can create full-proof gameplans for every scenario? who can scout the opposition from top-to-bottom? who can coach their way out of a corner?

now, against the mavs last night, the kings biggest problem was simple: they could not stop their opponent from scoring. they made a little run in the second half, but, even with the momentum swinging in their direction, they allowed the mavs to squash it with superior execution. however, had the kings been able to stop the mavs more consistently, they still would not have had the advantage they enjoyed in their previous outings. against portland: 14 steals. against orlando: 11 steals. against the mavericks: 4 steals. there are gonna be games, particularly on road trips, back-to-backs, four-games-in-five-nights, etc., where a young team like the kings won't bring their best defensive effort, or simply won't be able to force turnovers against a disciplined veteran squad. in those games, there must be an out, there must be a path to victory...

in other words, there must be a disciplined gameplan--on both sides of the floor--that asks something more of its team than simply running up and down the court, because good teams, veteran teams seek to take that ability away. it is, in fact, the very first principle of winning basketball: limit an opponent's easy baskets by protecting the ball, keeping one's turnovers to a minimum, and hustling back in transition defense...

I really don't understand what you're talking about. Please clarify the jargon.
 
Back
Top