I just wanted to comment on something that seems to be taken as fact. And that's the idea that no player of any value would want to come and play for the Kings. Are players influenced by the past reputation of a team? Of course they are. No player wants to go and play for an organization that won't fix up the teams locker room, lets the roof leak in the arena, keeps cutting salary, and in general, just won't spend money on anything team related. So the organization matters. And yes, the Kings under the Maloofs developed a terrible reputation. But that reputation has been reversed, and trust me, it doesn't take years for that information to get around the league. The rest of the world knows that the new administration is open for business, and is willing to spend money. For god's sake, just look at our payroll.
That part aside, what most players care about are money, fit, playing time, and winning. You'll notice that I have winning last there. That's because most players don't have the luxury of putting winning first. The Lebron's and Durant's of the world do, and that's because they're either making, or have made, a ton of money already. Dwayne Wade can afford to take a 15% pay cut in order to insure a winning team. The Sessions and Collisons of the world can't. Of course that doesn't mean they don't want to win. But first on their list, is money, and then playing time. Players want to play, and they want to enjoy playing. They want it to be fun. It is a game after all. I played baseball because I loved playing the game. A lot of them are married and have children, so location is important to them. The player is a lot happier if his wife and kids are happy. No one likes taking family problems to work with them, and NBA players are no different.
Sacramento as a town, and the Kings as a team, could/should be a very appealing destination for a lot of players. Yes, the organization needs to sell that, but on the surface, there's a lot to like. We have two marquis players in Cousins and Gay, and we've taken on the appearance of a team on the rise. Were being talked about nationally as such. Our image is changing, and our thinking as fans has to change with it. We need to stop thinking of ourselves as a rest stop between San Francisco and Reno. If you want to be the best, then start thinking like your the best. Quit caring about what others think. It's what you think that's important. As a friend once told me, your either driving the bus, or your a passenger on it. The idea that players in general don't want to come and play for the Kings is nonsense. Of course there are exceptions. There's always going to be those players that lust for the big city lights and the media attention that comes with it.
Why did Gay re-sign with us? Because he felt the team was on the rise, the money was right, it was a good fit, and his family liked Sacramento. Gay isn't the exception, he's the rule. He's far more representative of what players are looking for, than Carmelo Anthony is, or Shaq was when he played, and I'm not knocking them. Whatever floats your boat. I firmly believe that the majority of players would be interested in playing for the Kings, if the price is right, the fit feels right, and they feel they'll get appropriate playing time. Not saying that there won't be stiff competition at times. If your a player and you have to choose between Portland and Sacramento, and the money is the same, your probably leaning toward Portland since they're further along in their development. That's when PD has to make sure they know it rains a hell of lot more in Portland. OK, just kidding, but seriously, its up to the organization to sell a player on coming here. You won't win every battle, but you won't lose because Sacramento isn't an appealing destination. That's simply not an excuse anymore. In my humble opinion!