We've already pushed IT to the starting line up...
I'm not a Jimmer fan, but what do you mean by "true" stars? You really sound like a Jimmer hater right now..
Just a hint? You'll do a lot better if you don't start tossing around the "h" word.
We've already pushed IT to the starting line up...
I'm not a Jimmer fan, but what do you mean by "true" stars? You really sound like a Jimmer hater right now..
Hmm. Nice little cheap-shot to IT after a great win. How does it make any sense at all to put an "IT is struggling" poll goes up after his worst shooting performance of the year? With a 4 game sample? And when outside of tonight, he wasn't even struggling in January? Prior to tonight, he was 22 PPG, 7.5 APG on 57% TS and 16 FGA/game in January.
But I suppose it's just my biased tendencies that I even mention it.
Hmm. Nice little cheap-shot to IT after a great win. How does it make any sense at all to put an "IT is struggling" poll goes up after his worst shooting performance of the year? With a 4 game sample? And when outside of tonight, he wasn't even struggling in January? Prior to tonight, he was 22 PPG, 7.5 APG on 57% TS and 16 FGA/game in January.
But I suppose it's just my biased tendencies that I even mention it.
I agree. Jimmer is becoming that role of instant offense off the bench that we want to move IT back into. Now we have that spark to help the bench so we should just ride it out.If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Right now, Jimmer is finally coming into his own. His confidence is soaring and his game is the best I've seen since he entered the NBA. Why would you want to mess with that?
Jimmer's doing good, the team is coming together. As I said, it ain't broke.
It is. It is even more disappointing to see you try and use a stat like TS when you know it doesn't illustrate how he has been shooting. While I haven't crunched the numbers I find it hard to believe the mess in Portland doesn't skews that stat terribly.
edited: playing to shooting
Just gets annoying every time jimmer score 6 pts or more this comes up. I want him to be successful and I think he found a role where he can do that. But when the post pop up about him starting after every good game I'd almost rather he get a DNP than to hear the nonsense. Could you imagine if ppl reacted this way every time bobby Jackson had a good game. It gets old and its been 2 1/2 years of old.I gotta agree with Npliam. That's kind of a rude thing to say. For the most part, the Jimmer fans still here aren't overbearing. Them saying they'd like to see Jimmer start is no different than someone else saying they'd like to see a different player starting. I don't agree with fixing something that isn't broken right now, but I certainly don't blame them for hoping for more for the guy they came here for in the first place.
It's all good.
![]()
![]()
My favorite play of the night
I really think Malone screwed up Ben's first year. If he had brought him along slowly, allowing him to play limited minutes against 2nd unit players, he wouldn't have completely lost his confidence. Now Ben looks worse than at any time this season, and his shooting percentage is awful. He just looks like a guy who has no confidence. And Marcus? He should feel embarrassed for his play this season.
Just gets annoying every time jimmer score 6 pts or more this comes up. I want him to be successful and I think he found a role where he can do that. But when the post pop up about him starting after every good game I'd almost rather he get a DNP than to hear the nonsense. Could you imagine if ppl reacted this way every time bobby Jackson had a good game. It gets old and its been 2 1/2 years of old.
I know there are plenty here who will disagree with me, but I'm not sure what the team has to lose by at least trying Jimmer out at the starting position. IIRC he was given a few starts early in his NBA career, but we all know that the coaching/management/team had gone to poopoo at that point in time. I'd like to see what he could do with more minutes right now. He has been scoring at high PPM, I'd be curious what kind of numbers he could put up given the opportunity.
If Chicago wants to blow things up I'd throw anybody at them for butler outside of those 3Its hard to blame that on Malone. Remember that was exactly Malone's plan, and then Thornton came out and laid a stinky egg to start the season. Little did we know that was going to be the GOOD stretch of SG play for us. Blech.
Not sure if it matters anyway. if we go ahead with CUz/Gay/It we don't need a SG anyway, Ben included. We'll just need a designated defender at that spot. Sefalosha lite.
In case you missed it in the Derrick Williams thread
DeMarcus "Magic" Cousins to Derrick "Carter" Williams different angle
![]()
I'm gonna respond to it. I got a bad habit of doing what I want.Then stop stoking the fire...
Offense ain't the problem in the starting five. Defense is. Jimmer doesn't do anything to help solve that playing at the 2.
Then you are going to keep getting what [you claim] you don't want.I'm gonna respond to it. I got a bad habit of doing what I want.
![]()
My favorite play of the night
It started before I said anything. You think I brought it up?Then you are going to keep getting what [you claim] you don't want.
I'm gonna respond to it. I got a bad habit of doing what I want.
It started before I said anything. You think I brought it up?
Just gets annoying every time jimmer score 6 pts or more this comes up. I want him to be successful and I think he found a role where he can do that. But when the post pop up about him starting after every good game I'd almost rather he get a DNP than to hear the nonsense. Could you imagine if ppl reacted this way every time bobby Jackson had a good game. It gets old and its been 2 1/2 years of old.
Yeah this is a good point. I personally don't think Jimmer ever starts on this team at any position, although I would love to see it. (at least not with IT at point).
1) I think Malone would probably still say Jimmer isn't a PG. He's playing him out of necessity, but would rather play him at the 2.
2) IT and Jimmer as the backcourt probably scares the crap out of Malone from a defensive standpoint.
I'm gonna respond to it. I got a bad habit of doing what I want.
I have not ONCE dumped on jimmer this entire time. Don't pin that strawman on me. I said he is very successful in his current role. I am trying to disarm the ones advocating to change the role jimmer is being successful in.Honestly? I think you're over-reacting. Jimmer has been dumped on ROYALLY around here, and his fans have suffered a lot. He's finally showing glimpses of what they have hoped for all this time. I think we can cut them a little slack.
Then you are going to keep getting what [you claim] you don't want.
I have not ONCE dumped on jimmer this entire time. Don't pin that strawman on me. I said he is very successful in his current role. I am trying to disarm the ones advocating to change the role jimmer is being successful in.
It's called dialog. Someone quotes you they expect a response. It how it works much like you have responded each time I have quoted you. Do you feel you are stoking a fire or just running a course of dialog? Sometimes conversation gets misconstrued as adversarial. Just voicing opinion I haven't personally attacked anybody or bashed anybody. Not sure why I'm getting the ridicule. I am positive I'm not alone in my sentimentUm... read my earlier post... I said stop STOKING the fire. I didn't say you started the fire. You and Billy Joel have that in common.