[Grades] Grades v. Lakers 12/6/2013

Who needed more minutes tonight for us to win?

  • Williams

    Votes: 11 27.5%
  • Thompson

    Votes: 4 10.0%
  • Cousins

    Votes: 6 15.0%
  • McLemore

    Votes: 9 22.5%
  • Vasquez

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Thomas

    Votes: 10 25.0%

  • Total voters
    40
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
KF_GradingConsortium201314600x378_zps660e18ea.jpg


Ok, so the hard fought loss thing? Getting old already, and its the first week old December. This time it was a late megacollapse worthy of the Smart and earlier years. Turnovers, bad shots, coaching questions (waited too long to go back to the starters) etc. After a brilliant first half, IT was never the same in the second and the offense fell apart under him, and to top it he may have tweaked an ankle. The Big Guy can't escape the blame either as he was swarmed, and had ball after ball poked away or blocked when it came winning time. Just...hard fought loss doesn't cut it here. Didn't feel good. Didn't feel like an accomplishment. Felt like we blew it. Again. And this is one of those fences you can't balance on forever. Either you get it together, clean up your act, and start winning enough to justify the effort, or you fall off the other way into ugly despair. But nobody goes through an entire season losing in the final 2 minutes every night. Something has to give.

Your Consoritum Graders tonight:
Bricklayer
Uncia03
Spudfan
Capt. Factorial
MassachusettsKingsFan


Boxscore

Stats: 25min 9pts (2-5, 0-0, 5-6) 9reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Williams ( C+ ) -- Williams was quiet on offense tonight. He looks like he's getting comfortable in Malone's plays, moving where he needs to be when he doesn't have the ball but tonight he wasn't terribly involved. He did get to the line 6 times (making 5), which is very nice, but he only made two FGs. Both of those were dunks, one off of a hard cut receiving a pass from Cousins and the other on a pretty reverse jam from a baseline pass from McLemore. His other three shots were also at the rim, one a missed reverse on a baseline drive and two missed putbacks following offensive boards. The boards were a much better part of Williams' game tonight, as he was credited for nine rebounds (though two of those were technically loose balls). On defense, Williams was doing a lot of sagging off of his man to provide hesitant double-teams in the paint. Still, that really only resulted in two makes and 5 points, and one consequence of Williams sagging was that he was there to make some stops when help rotation was needed. He stepped in on a Sacre drive in the first and stopped a dunk but was forced to foul - with Sacre missing on one FT it was a net-positive. Very early in the third he was needed in the paint twice, once to stop a driving Sacre and once to stop a planted Gasol, and he forced a miss at the rim both times. He also put some very tough contests on a couple of Nick Young jumpers. Altogether, he's putting together a pretty good argument against the idea that he can't guard the SF position, but I'd like to see a bit of offense away from the rim. --Capt.

Stats: 23min 9pts (4-5, 0-0, 1-2) 5reb 0ast 0stl 1blk 0TO
Thompson ( B ) -- Tonight was one of those perfect JT games where he played within himself and did exactly what we want him to do. In limited minutes (23) he made 4-5 field goals which included 2 makes from 20 feet and 2 baskets off of strong moves near the rim. Although Pau scored on about half his attempts vs JT, the defense was solid. He forced one turnover when Pau made an attempt at backing him down and even blocked a 6 foot jumper! The 5 rebounds he grabbed is what we expect from him and I don’t think he had any missed block outs which have been a bit of a problem recently. If he gets more playtime tonight there is a good chance we come away with the win. These kind of strong games is what have made it so hard for other players to supplant him in the starting lineup. JT’s bonus stat of tonight? Zero turnovers! --Spud

Stats: 32min 20pts (6-17, 0-0, 8-12) 11reb 4ast 2stl 1blk 6TO
Cousins ( C- ) -- This was a tale of two halves for DMC in this one. In the first half he was a dominant presence and there simply was nothing that the Lakers could do to stop him. My favorite possession of the night is when Cousins did his work early and established deep post position on the right side. The right side isn’t the side that he prefers which perhaps why the Lakers didn’t fight too hard to stop him from getting that position. Anyway, he spun into the lane and finished with a nice little left-handed hook over Gasol. The move was really smooth and if he can gain confidence with using the left hook after establishing position on the right block it will open up his post game tremendously to be able to start on either block and finish with either hand. Anyway, the Lakers couldn’t stop him in the post so they resorted to hacking/slamming/fouling him at every opportunity, probably with the hopes of beating him up to the point where he’d slow down. They even started Robert Sacre (1st start of the season) to be a big body and bang with him from the opening whistle. (Sacre picked up a number of fouls and had his 3rd by the mid-way point of the 2nd half.) By the end of the 1st half he had only taken 7 shots (making 4) but was sitting on 13 points as he continually went to the foul-line. In the third quarter it was a mixed bag for Cousins. His shot wasn’t falling for him and in one sequence I think he ended up with 3 shot attempts and 2 offensive rebounds and ultimately no points as he couldn’t seem to get anything to go. He was however, passing the ball very well and found multiple guys at the rim for good shot opportunities. Cousins’ demise, as well as the teams came in the 4th quarter. He left the 3rd quarter earlier than normal (5 minute mark) and therefore came in earlier than we’re used to seeing at the 9:30 mark of the 4th quarter after the Lakers went on an 11-0 run to take a 1 point lead. Unfortunately for us, he didn’t make a single basket in the 4th quarter. He did manage to score three points on 4 free-throw attempts, but that the extent of his scoring. I don’t know if it was the ankle, which it definitely could have been, or if he was just worn out with all the body blows he’d received during the course of the game, but he had no spring to his step and was really sluggish. Two times he made a move in the middle of the paint and had the ball stuffed back into his face and he had a couple of turn-overs to complicate things. But what will be remembered are the last two offensive possessions by the kings. With the Kings up 1, he received the ball at the left elbow, and even though the opportunity to post/drive was there, with the Lakers in the penalty, he took and missed the elbow jumper. (He hadn’t hit a jumper this game.) Gasol made his jumper on the other end putting the Lakers up and on the next possession Cousins did try to take it into the paint from the left post and turned it over while falling down. The Lakers in transition hit the three since they were playing 5 on 4 and that was basically the game. On defense he and Vasquez were not at all on the same page as Blake continually connected with Sacre on the pick-and-roll, allowing Sacre easy scoring opportunities. He actually did a very good job guarding Gasol in the post and his PnR coverage did improve in the 4th quarter. So in the 1st quarter he was sitting at 13 points on 7 shots and he ended the game with 20 points on 17 shots. He just didn’t have it on the offensive end in the 2nd half and it could be due to the ankle. This was a game where he wasn’t able to come through for the team in the clutch and probably personally takes the blame for the team’s loss due to his inability to deliver down the stretch. He still put up 20 points, 11 rebounds, and 4 assists and he’s only one of three guys currently putting up 20 and 10, but the turn-overs and lack of production in the fourth lost us the game so I felt that I had to be a bit hard on the grade. --Uncia

Stats: 32min 20pts (8-17, 4-7, 0-0) 6reb 1ast 2stl 0blk 2TO
McLemore ( B+ ) -- I think we are starting to see some tangible progress in regards to McLemore’s development. He opened the game up doing a little bit of everything. Scored on a fast break dunk off of a pass from Williams (something that is becoming more than a trend). He hit an early 3, but he was also mixing it up inside, scrapping on defense, hustling to save the ball from going out of bounds, etc. Malone must have noticed this as well, because McLemore was the last starter to get subbed out in the first half. I think this was the first time that has happened all year. He was impossible to miss out there tonight. I also thought he handled the ball more tonight than he has in games past, and while the results were very hit or miss, it’s important that he isn’t shying away from it. On the positive side, he used his dribble to escape his man and hit more than one jumper pulling up. He used his dribble on a drive to the rim, and instead of taking the ball all the way to the basket himself he made a smart pass to Williams who was wide open in the paint. It wasn’t perfect by any means. He still had his far share of dribble-induced turnovers, including one late in the 4th quarter that probably sealed the game for the Lakers. Overall though, this was a very good game from Ben, particularly on offense. The funny part is, it could have been even better! I thought his shot selection was really good most of the night, and he actually missed quite a few wide-open jumpers that you’d expect him to make. Defensively Ben spent some time on just about all of the Lakers guards, and while the effort was there (it always is) he was still to late to often closing out on 3 point attempts, but he didn’t kill the Kings on that end like he has before. --Mass

Stats: 23min 5pts (2-5, 1-3, 0-0) 0reb 6ast 0stl 1blk 1TO
Vasquez ( C ) -- the Greivis chronicles part...well I've already forgotten what part we are up to, but its beginning to feel familiar. Fortunately this time out there was no quickness to particularly burn him on defense, at least not any worse than our other guards who simply refused to stay with the Lakers three point chuckers. But one more time we had him leading our starters in the first quarter, and just not getting much done. He's out there, but he could be anyone. He missed a pullup three, he did slap one ball away on defense, but he mattered not at all and was a statistical bagel. But then as we have sometimes seen, he came out in the third, and was a new man. He stepped into a three for his first points of the game, and maybe that triggered something as a minute later he began an extended run of excellent playmaking setting up dunks at the rim for Ben, for Williams, finally for Cuz. In fact that stretch was the best the team as a whole played in the entire game, he had the offense humming and we caught up and then opened a lead. Queue the tiebreaker for this grade, as the 4th quarter turned into a real mess for us, extending all the way up to the coach who left in a struggling IT for too long, then in desperation finally went back to what had been working 12 minutes ago, and reinserted Greivis and several other starters. Except what we got back was first quarter Greivis again, not 3rd quarter Greivis. He did nothing to steady our meltdown, showed his limited shooting range again. He did get shot over, but it was a good challenge at elast. And in any case we get another night where we get a guy who put up big numbers on a bad team last year looking a lot like somebody who could only put up big numbers on a bad team. He has these little bursts when he's good, but it was another night when he mysteriously just could not sustain. --Brick
 
Last edited:
Bench

Stats: 26min 13pts (5-9, 3-5, 0-0) 4reb 0ast 1stl 1blk 1TO
Salmons ( B ) -- Salmons had a pretty good night tonight, and for once earned his 26 minutes. For most of the game he was matched up with Nick Young, and he held Young to 7 points on 3/10 shooting, though one of those was a tightly contested jumper in the final minute that found net and put the Lakers up 6. He did get a great stop on Young at the end of the third quarter, staying in front of him then blocking his shot on the drive. He also had a good shooting night, going 60% from the corner three and finishing with 13 points on 9 shots. He didn't have any assists tonight, but he wasn't ball-stopping like the Salmons of old. On his first possession he kicked the ball in to Cousins in the post for two points, and early in the fourth he zipped a pass in to Cousins practically underneath the basket that DeMarcus was unable to cash in. It wasn't a flashy game, but he was working on D and kept an inefficient gunner in Young gunning at well below his career average percentage.--Capt.

Stats: 22min 2pts (1-9, 0-1, 0-0) 7reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Patterson ( F ) -- Absolutely terrible. Patterson’s only basket came off of a wide open layup which was set up by IT. The other 8 shots he took? All misses. It was a terrible night for Patrick and with JT playing so well one can only assume that Patterson played as many minutes as he did in and effort to showcase his ability as a stretch 4. Unfortunately for us, a stretch four who shoots 1-9 isn’t going to scream value to anyone… which will make it hard (impossible?) to move him. But hey, at least he grabbed 7 rebounds tonight, right? I am sure all those teams looking for a stretch 4 will be impressed by his rebounding which has been surprisingly good as of late. With Patterson being a relatively smart player, who can play passable defense, he should be a valuable part to a playoff team when knocking down shots. Let’s hope he starts making some of these open looks he has been getting before his value hits zero. --Spud

Stats: 25min 14pts (6-13, 2-4, 0-0) 2reb 9ast 4stl 0blk 2TO
Thomas ( B+ ) -- I gave this grade some thought because something has to be understood here: IT in the first half of this one was just silly. His first half has to be right up there with the best halves of basketball he has played in the pros. I mentioned the other night that IT was "having one of those quarters" where he turned into a one man gang and there wasn't any point in grading it -- he was the selfish dude out on the playground on a hot streak. And he was either going to gun you to victory or gun you to death, and there wasn't anything you could do about it. But IT's first half this time was something else. This wasn't IT as gunner/chucker, although he did take a couple of those gunner shots. This was just excellent play in all facets. It wasn't just a hot shooting streak. From the moment he entered the game he goosed us up a gear on the break. The steals total is a little deceptive, as most of thoise came when other people knocked the ball away, and IT was just the guy to scoop it up, but that was the thing: he was always around the ball on defense this time. Once he saw Steve Blake had trapped himself, and raced all the way back from the top of the circle to pick off the only pass Blake had left to him because IT saw the angle and anticipated the pass. Another time he darted down in freelance defense mode to disrupt Pau, and Pau ended up falling on his ass as a result. And on offense yeah, he was making his shots, including one of those dumb threes in transition off his dribble, but the real thing was the degree that he was using his superpowers for the forces of good for once, as he drove and kicked to shooter after shooter after shooter. He probably had half a dozen assists by halftime, and it could have been more if Patrick Patterson hadn't decided to shoot like Hasheem Thabeet. It was just flat out good stuff on both ends, and if old Arco had finally collapsed at halftime, this grade would have been an A+. Alas for him, the barn stayed up for a second half, and that was where my grade calculations got more complex. When he first returned near the end of the third, he picked right up where Greivis had left off with the passing attack, twice using the now excessive attention the Lakers were paying him to set up M16 for back to back threes. But those would be his last moments of glory. The Lakers were suddenly around him with length, and suddenly he disappeared. Trouble may have gotten worse when out on the break to try to beat the 3rd quarter buzzer, he tried to twist and suddenly took an ugly step and it was lucky he came up limping rather than having to be helped off. There weren't any obvious signs of discomfort in the 4th, but things went so badly you have to wonder a little. We scored 10 pts in that quarter as we died -- Ben's junk three in the final seconds after the game was lost hardly counts. And IT ran the first 9+ minutes of it and just could get nothing done anymore. He was swarmed on his shot attempts, and nothing came even close as he was blocked and altered. Maybe the extra attention combined with his size also cut down on his vision, because he wasn't seeing teammates like he had in his first stint and we notched three assists the whole quarter, none of them belonging to IT. The energetic boost just became a long extended slog instead, and while I saw people saying ooh, should never have put Greivis back in, I disagree. We should have put Greivis back in earlier because this game died on IT's second watch while he put up 0pts and 0ast on 0-4 shooting. That's not to say he killed us, the shots he took in the 4th were poor, but they were also desperation shots because nobody else was doing anything at all. But in any case, we needed a change, and I think Malone has to bear some blame for not just going right back to the full starting unit that had gotten us that lead in the 3rd. Anyway, brilliant first half, poor second half but not a destructively selfish one, and we lost. That can't be an A. But his early play was so strong it doesn't deserve to be totally muted out by the disappointing finish, so B+ it is. --Brick

Stats: 15min 6pts (2-3, 0-0, 2-2) 4reb 0ast 1stl 0blk 0TO
Hayes ( C- ) -- Hayes played a pretty decent 1st half. He was adequate on the boards and played very solid defense. He even scored 4 points (1-2 from the field, & 2-2 from the line) which is always a bonus. However, he had a miserable 2nd half as he was completely dominated on the glass by Jordan Hill and was in there when the Lakers made their big run to close the gap on the Kings and take the lead. If he had played as well in the 2nd half as he had in the 1st I don’t think the Lakers make as big of a run. --Uncia

Stats: 16min 2pts (1-3, 0-2, 0-0) 3reb 2ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
Thornton ( D+ ) -- Thornton wasn’t great tonight, but I didn’t think it was a total disaster either. He scored his only two points on a strong aggressive drive to the basket, but he was never really able to get his offensive game going. That being said, I thought Thornton made a few really nice passes that either led to Kings points, or should have led to Kings points. There was one play in particular where Thornton had himself a good, open look from 3, but instead of shooting it he moved the ball over to Salmons who was in the corner with an even better look (which he hit). This was one of many unselfish plays the usually selfish Thornton made tonight. Marcus has a tendency to shut his game down completely when he isn’t scoring. He didn’t do that tonight, and generally competed hard for the 16 minutes he played, but he can be better. --Mass

Stats: 1min 0pts (0-0, 0-0, 0-0) 0reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 0TO
McCallum ( INC ) -- apparently just in for our final possession of the game after Cuz fouled out. I did not even notice until I saw the boxscore. So welcome to the NBA kid! Quite the debut to write home about.--Brick
 
Last edited:
I don't know who should have played more - all I know is Kings on floor for final 4-5 minutes of crunch time were busy crunching themselves against hated Lakers. More fourth quarter blues, more fourth quarter debacle tonight:(

LA 28-24-29-25 / 106
SAC 30-25-32-13 / 100
 
It wasn't really who *should* have gotten minutes, more like who *shouldn't* have gotten minutes. Thornton was invisible, Patterson was terrible, Salmons was decent. But really, McLemore, Williams and JT were all better and should have been in much earlier in the fourth.
 
IT-Ben-D-will-JT-Cousins should have been our final 8min roster. Really, unless someone else is having a fantastic game, that should be our final 8 min lineup every game
 
And I really, really like what D-Will brings. He's certainly not a liability defensively at SF and even been really solid, he's got a great motor, he's got the ability to help the starting 5 score, and he helps tremendously on the boards. 9 boards in 25 minutes
 
and i think the IT-MT-Salmons-PP-Hayes lineup that took our 10pt lead and made it into a 1pt Laker lead at the end of the 3rd/beginning of the 4th was pretty much the biggest reason for the Loss
 
And I really, really like what D-Will brings. He's certainly not a liability defensively at SF and even been really solid, he's got a great motor, he's got the ability to help the starting 5 score, and he helps tremendously on the boards. 9 boards in 25 minutes
totally agree. and him being benched in 4th quarters has now hurt us in a couple games in a row
 
Thornton and Patterson used to be rotation/starter quality, but have absolutely blown this year.

I can understand playing them in hopes they can do what they used to do, but eventually they will have to get the PT appropriate for their level of play. Which is the fringe of an NBA roster. Hopefully they will be traded before that happens.
 
and i think the IT-MT-Salmons-PP-Hayes lineup that took our 10pt lead and made it into a 1pt Laker lead at the end of the 3rd/beginning of the 4th was pretty much the biggest reason for the Loss
Yep Ppat not being able to shoot is worthless to us.
 
and i think the IT-MT-Salmons-PP-Hayes lineup that took our 10pt lead and made it into a 1pt Laker lead at the end of the 3rd/beginning of the 4th was pretty much the biggest reason for the Loss

Not that lineup, but more of Chuck Hayes.... Jordan Hill at one point had like 4 straight possessions where he grabbed a rebound over Hayes and it lead to Laker points.
 
I missed the game. Is there a reason why Cousins absolutely can't stay out of foul trouble? He can't block so I don't know how else he is collecting these fouls.
 
I missed the game. Is there a reason why Cousins absolutely can't stay out of foul trouble? He can't block so I don't know how else he is collecting these fouls.

He really never was in foul trouble in this game.
Only had 2 in the 1st half and I know that he fouled out with an intentional foul on Pau Gasol at the end of the game after it had been lost.
Fouls definitely were not the issue with him tonight.
 
I missed the game. Is there a reason why Cousins absolutely can't stay out of foul trouble? He can't block so I don't know how else he is collecting these fouls.

Well frankly the can't block is a REASON for some of his fouls -- I..e great shotblockers get the block not the foul, but we are relying on hi to try to stop guys anyway without that ability -- in other words the we need a rim defender so Cousins doesn't have to try to do that stuff again.

But in this particular game, no the key fouls in the third were just of the dumb variety. He got mad at being hacked on one end, so semi-intentionally hacked Sacre on the other, with a little floppy help of course. And then on a play which everyone but Boogie saw coming, with 3 fouls he decides to take the ball full court rather than dumping it to a guard, and got a charge call. Boom 4 fouls, out of the game.

The 6 fouls is a bit deceptive though. #5 and #6 were in the final minute due to intentional foul time.
 
IT-Ben-D-will-JT-Cousins should have been our final 8min roster. Really, unless someone else is having a fantastic game, that should be our final 8 min lineup every game

This !!!!!!

OMG it was such a great game til last 3 minutes!

Turnover - laker score turnover -laker score

Then had to listen to obnoxious Laker Fan behind me Screaming as Kings fans filed out of the building during last min!!!

Only 10 pts in 4th Qtr !!!! (not counting BenMac Meaningless 3 pt at end)

We needed more Cowbell!!!!!
 
Fouls definitely were not the issue with him tonight.
well it kind of was. he picked up his 4th foul with like 6:30 left in the 3rd.

in the 4th quarter fouls were not a problem though. as was already mentions, he fouled out on an intentional foul when the game was over
 
it's been an hour or 2 and im still mad about this loss. I know some people out there think these losses do more good than bad but man we should have won this. just because it was the lakers. you want losses for the draft, fine, I don't care if we go 4-78. as long as the 4 wins are against the lakers.
 
Bmacs 3 at the end did give him a new career high of 20 also tied his highs for rebounds and steals
 
i just don't understand Malone's thinking on leaving McLemore and Williams out. i mean they are kind of the reason we got a 10pt lead towards the end of the 3rd. but then he just decided their work was done for the night?
 
We have two guys with stone hands. JT and Patterson. Also, I understand PP can hit those shots, but please STOP when you miss 2 or 3. Take your ripped, beastly ass inside and battle.
Vasquez still can't defend a cone.
We still can't defend the 3.
We still can't block a shot to save our lives.
I saw Chuck take a tumble-roll while making a Euro-step Ginobli layup. That was awesome.

Cousins may have gotten 20 and 11, but he was dreadful to watch at times. He obviously can't age over a couple of days, so that ankle is obviously still bothering him. He looked like present day KG. Sluggish, slow, losing balls inside & trying to act his way to fouls rather than just pump fake and go up.

B-Mac still looks like a headless chicken when dribbling the ball. But, is the complete opposite off the ball.

All in all, it was a pathetic showing in the end. We choked.
 
i just don't understand Malone's thinking on leaving McLemore and Williams out. i mean they are kind of the reason we got a 10pt lead towards the end of the 3rd. but then he just decided their work was done for the night?

To hell with Thornton, Salmons, Outlaw's minutes anyways in the face of developing Ben and DWill. These are players (Thornton, Salmons, Outlaw) that most likely won't be here past next year. They might be trying to preserve what semblance of trade value they have or are worried about their attitudes in the lockerroom if they are not getting ample time. I think I read a comment in the game thread that someone wondered if Malone was actively sabotaging the game for the tank which might be going a bit far
 
Last edited:
Grand and Jerry - F. My goodness did I miss something or are we still the Sacramento Kings? They spend half their entire broadcast just heaping praise on Isaiah Thomas, telling the world that IT plays big and yadayada it's like a broken record at this point. What's that? Insight you say? Did I hear someone say commentary? Who needs that when you can just talk about the Hustlin' Huskie? Oh wait Jerry did provide some pretty good analysis. Patrick Patterson's shot is off because ... wait for it ... "I have no idea Grant. I think he's just over-thinking it". WOW! MINDBLOWING! And that my friends, was the extent of their actual basketball analysis the entire game.

Lakers finally figured out how to stop us. I think Brick mentioned it a few games back - our bench lineup doesn't have anyone else who can score, so just double Thomas, don't let him get the ball and live with other guys making shots.
 
Really just a flubbergusted victory. Threw it away.

What concerns me is that I've never been confident that Cousins is built for a fast break team and the old front office and the new have both tried to do that. Renadive wants athletic guys that will perform in the open court. Cousins needs a half-court team. He does not get back and forth well.
 
#Derrick Williams I have no doubt in my mind is a SF
#Cousins needed to realise what was working for him that game which was facing up and driving
#Ben Mac other than the massive turnover was great
#Thornton actually made some very nice plays
#JT and Patterson both let us down......yet again
#Thomas like Cousins only played well in the first half
#Vasquez" I've had enough of watching Vasquez get trashed bring the rookie in let him play

It's kind of depressing watching teams with far less talent than us like Boston, Suns and a few others having far more successful seasons while we are close in games but just can't escape idiotic basketball long enough to pull through, it's just awful plays at the wrong time every single game it seems. We got to starting winning against teams like the Lakers regardless if we are trying to hit the lottery.
 
well it kind of was. he picked up his 4th foul with like 6:30 left in the 3rd.

in the 4th quarter fouls were not a problem though. as was already mentions, he fouled out on an intentional foul when the game was over

Sort of. He was out at the 5 minute mark of the 3rd quarter which is 2-3 minutes earlier than normal, but he came back in at the 9:30 mark of the 4th which is 2-3 minutes earlier than normal, so it balanced out. Here is when he came and went in the game
1st Quarter: Out at 2:00 minute mark
2nd Quarter: In at 6:30 minute mark
3rd Quarter: Out at the 5 minute mark
4th Quarter: In at the 9:30 mark

So you can see that though he did leave 3 minutes earlier in the 3rd, he also came back in 3 minutes earlier in the 4th and so ended up with 32 minutes which what you see during games when he doesn't have major foul issues.

Anyway, I don't think the fouls had any issues with his putrid 4th quarter performance. He was aggressive for the most part, but just didn't see capable of performing like he did in the 1st half, and I have to assume the ankle was the cause. If that's the case, I don't expect a superior showing from him in tomorrow's game. We'll see.
 
What concerns me is that I've never been confident that Cousins is built for a fast break team and the old front office and the new have both tried to do that. Renadive wants athletic guys that will perform in the open court. Cousins needs a half-court team. He does not get back and forth well.

This was actually a major concern when I heard what PDA's 'ideal' NBA team would look like. He said he'd want all athletes to run and gun and just wear the opponent down. However, I think it was the first game that we played and we kept going into Cousins into the post over and over again and just pounded away to good success. When I saw that I knew that Malone knew what he had in Cousins and that the key to victory was to ride Cousins as much as he could, so that left me reassured.

I don't care a whit about regular season wins and blowing people out and scoring 110 points a night. The only way we are going to be successful in the post-season is to punish smaller teams with Cousins, so as long as I continue to see Cousins being used in that manner I'll be happy as a clam while I await the proper pieces to be put around him to actually make the play-offs.

My preference would be to have a team set up that predominately works in the half court using both execution and brute force, but I'm definitely all for having athletes that can run the floor and get easy buckets provided that it doesn't take away from how we should be utilizing Cousins.
 

This was actually a major concern when I heard what PDA's 'ideal' NBA team would look like. He said he'd want all athletes to run and gun and just wear the opponent down. However, I think it was the first game that we played and we kept going into Cousins into the post over and over again and just pounded away to good success. When I saw that I knew that Malone knew what he had in Cousins and that the key to victory was to ride Cousins as much as he could, so that left me reassured.

I don't care a whit about regular season wins and blowing people out and scoring 110 points a night. The only way we are going to be successful in the post-season is to punish smaller teams with Cousins, so as long as I continue to see Cousins being used in that manner I'll be happy as a clam while I await the proper pieces to be put around him to actually make the play-offs.

My preference would be to have a team set up that predominately works in the half court using both execution and brute force, but I'm definitely all for having athletes that can run the floor and get easy buckets provided that it doesn't take away from how we should be utilizing Cousins.

Just so you know IT thought the team played too slow in the 4th :) He wants them to run.
 
Back
Top