[Grades] Grades v. Jazz 12/8/2014

What would you rather do tomorrow?

  • Beat L.A.

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Beat L.A.!

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Beat L.A.!!!

    Votes: 31 75.6%
  • leave poor LaMarcus Aldridge alone

    Votes: 6 14.6%

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
14jm54n.jpg


A win! A win! A Boogieless win! Not a dominant win. Not a rousing win. But a win! Yay!

You can feel the lack of talent out there for us, you can feel how when we go on a run now its like a 6pt run. How 5pts is a good lead now. But we ground this one out. Ground and ground, finally played some defense and reestablished our rebounding presence (and yes, I think the decision to start Evans was a good one for those purposes). And we had some good things develop. Ben didn't give us much (except a burst of good defense in the third), but this time it wasn't a disaster as we finally FINALLY got a breakout game from Stauskas. Rudy was huffing and puffing and I hope he has some gas left for tomorrow, but he huffed and puffed his way to a carry you down the stretch performance. Reggie recovered from a wobbly start to bring his special style of havoc, sneaky tricks, and boardwork inside, and we won with minor little performances from just enough people. That's the way its got to be with Cuz out, and unlike the Indiana "win" this was a true victory we didn't have to apologize for, albeit against a young team that has now lost 9 in a row.

Still... a win!!! We need them all. Take it, get back over .500 and onto L.A. for another must win.


Boxscore

Stats: 33min 29pts (10-19, 0-1, 9-10) 6reb 1ast 3stl 1blk 4TO
Gay ( A ) -- Rudy had a tremendous night tonight. There are things to complain about, but overall his game was so strong that I can't justify busting him down to even an A-. Gay started out the game focusing on the offensive end. In the first six minutes he established that he could get anywhere he wanted with the dribble, getting three very good shots in the lane in the opening stint (although he did miss two of those). At the same time, his defense on Hayward was sloppy. He was slumping off of Hayward and practically daring him to shoot open threes, but Hayward declined, opting instead to demonstrate that HE could drive around Rudy and get open with screens too. On one play Hayward blasted right past Rudy, who was forced to foul him, and was granted some very questionable free throws. By the time that Rudy sat in the first, the Gay/Hayward matchup was tied up 5-5. Hayward then proceeded to knock down 7 points in the final two minutes of the quarter while Rudy sat. Gordon didn't see the same Rudy Gay for the rest of the game. Rudy returned with Hayward on the bench, but shortly Gordon came back in and faced a Rudy who was up in his face and contesting shots and passes. Hayward did not manage to drive around Rudy for the remainder of the game. Even better, in the second and third quarters Rudy got completely in Hayward's head. Some of his shots were open, but in the second and third, Hayward managed exactly zero points on seven shots against Rudy (six of those threes, and one a drive where Rudy rejected the layup into the fifteenth row). In a highlight play, Rudy jumped the passing lane on an intended swing to Hayward for a steal and a breakaway dunk - one of three steals for Rudy on the night (he also caused a fourth turnover and broke up a fast break on two other deflections). Rudy had a little bit of rough luck on offense, committing turnovers on two straight possessions late in the third, one stepping out on a baseline drive (I thought he was pushed but no call) and one on a travel call on a north-south drive (I can't really explain that one as it didn't remotely look like a violation). Rudy sat for a good portion of the fourth while the bench began to extend a lead but came in with six minutes left in the game and hit two tough shots at the end of the shot clock to keep the pressure on the Jazz. Finally, with under 1:30 left Rudy beat the shot clock on a solid drive to put us up by 9 and pretty much seal the deal. His 9-10 from the line (4-4 in the end game) was also a big factor. In the end, Rudy convincingly won the matchup with Hayward, scoring 29 points on 10-19 shooting while holding Hayward to 9 points on 15 shots while Rudy was guarding him (and two of those were after the game was effectively over, another two were really Nik's fault for giving Hayward a breakaway on a bad pass). Even with Nik's big night, it's hard not to call Rudy player of the game. As a sidelight, Rudy actually rode the bench a bit more than I would have expected tonight in a game that was tight for most of the way, getting only 33 minutes, but with a back-to-back tomorrow Malone was likely trying to rest our current #1 guy a bit. --Capt.

Stats: 36min 10pts (3-8, 0-0, 4-6) 9reb 3ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Thompson ( B- ) -- A pretty good statline for JT tonight, with a bunch of hustle thrown in. Utah's frontcourt is pretty big, but not terribly skilled. JT had a good night on the boards, getting his hands on a few beyond the 9 he was credited and tipping them to teammates to open up the breaks. For a good portion of the game, the team was running the offense through JT at the high post and he made some very nice high-low passes that didn't turn into assists because either 1) the recipient of the pass was fouled, and/or 2) the recipient of the pass was Reggie Evans. He took a key charge at the end of the fourth to stop any chance of a Jazz comeback. A nice lunchpail effort. --Hadlowe

Stats: 34min 6pts (2-4, 0-0, 2-4) 13reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 0TO
Evans ( B ) -- announced at the last minute as a starter, I was kind of surprised we didn't go to this earlier with Cuz out. Its just such a huge across the board downgrade when starting Hollins, and at least with Reggie you know you have a guy who has a certain presence to him in one aspect of the game. The decision looked marginal early, Reggie looked active, and on one of several surprising plays just professionally pinned Derrick Favors under the hoop inside for a post score. But more notable was on the other end, where he per usual wasn't able to protect the rim (JT has apparently entire given upon that idea and just plays his man anymore) and he also let Kanter walk inside from all the way out near the 3pt line. And for some reason as usual our guards seem to need some facial recognition technology, because they insisted on throwing the ball inside to him as if He were DeMarcus. The poor results of that aren't even really on Reggie, its not like he is dribble driving it in there. Its just a very odd thing we seen to do as a team sometimes, and I don't get it. In any case, I wasn't sure whether he was a positive or not in his first stint, but when he came back in in the 2nd he immediately had an impact setting a big screen on Hayward and taking a pass for a layin. Then grabbing a strong rebound. But really in the first half Reggie was banging around in there, but he wasn't dominating the glass as he battled it out with Favors, Booker etc. That would change though as we ended up thumping a solid Utah rebounding team by +10 on the night. We went right to Reggie in the post on the first play to start the 3rd, which seemed like a bizarre coaching call and which could have resulted in a turnover, but the refs missed the call and gave Favors a 4th foul on the play, and just like that, we had fouled the Jazz's best young big man to the bench using Reggie bleeping Evans. Gotta love it, and one of those maybe sneaky little moments that helped us win this (although the way Rudy Gobert's length bothered us you weren't sure for a while). In any case, Reggie got stronger as the game went along, but he continued to be hindered by not finishing his touchless groundbound shots inside, and by an unusual case of the butterfingers, as several times he banged himself into offensive rebounding position only to see the ball slip off his fingertips out of bounds. Think maybe the physical play wore down the Jazz though, because Reggie really began to come on strong gobbling d-boards, and during the 4th his hustle and boarding became infectious and was a major factor as we pulled away. Not to mention a role as a human screen as he ran around up top sometimes setting 3 or 4 screens per play fro Rudy, DC, Nik (a much more useful role I think than us trying to have him actually do the scoring) . Had several clever little cheats in the quarter too of the sort that make me chuckle, but that you would hate to play against. On one play early in the quarter pinned Favors arm under his thus keeping Favors from chasing the ball and letting Nik pick it up for one of his 8rebs. On another a nice little two handed push right in the right spot on Kanter's back moved him just far enough out of position that Reggie could scoop up the board. Added a nice little scoop pass inside to JT for a dunk that got the crowd (hey crowd, where are you? We're 11-10 for the first time in a very long time) on its feet to make the lead 7. In any case, by the end of this one he'd hustled his way to 13rebs, and the remarkable thing is we just shrug about that. His limitations were too evident earlier in the game for this to be a huge grade, but sure enough by the end he'd had an impact and outrebounded Favors and Kanter combined. --Brick

Stats: 18min 6pts (2-5, 0-2, 2-2) 0reb 1ast 0stl 1blk 0TO
McLemore ( C ) -- Ben didn't score much tonight, and only played eighteen minutes. But he was mostly effective, especially on the defensive side of the ball. Offensively, he started by almost throwing the ball away. Only a great save by Gay avoided a turnover. On the next possession Ben curled off of a pick, drove the lane and laid it in. He tried it again a bit later and was fouled, going two for two from the line. His only other points came on a break away and a dunk shortly before the half. In between the was short on a three, and had his shot partially blocked on another attempt. His defense was very good though. He got back on a break in time to keep Hayward from an easy basket. Actually looked like he got a lot of ball to me. On another sequence he foiled Kanter under the basket, and then before going to the bench, he blocked a shot. My only complaint is that he recorded no rebounds. Other than that, not a bad --Baja

Stats: 32min 16pts (6-12, 0-2, 4-4) 2reb 6ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Collison ( C+ ) -- I wasn't wildly in love with this outing by Collison, and indeed there was a point in the first half where Ramon Sessions was actually running the team better than Collison was. Seriously. He didn't dominate his matchup with Burke, but by the end he had done just enough, stayed efficient, and had a few little spurts to contribute. And contribute was the watchword for most of the Kings tonight. off to a good start scoring on a jumper and then a drive as he had no problem with Burke and was able to repeatedly pullup for little jumpers. But seemed to lose the thread defensively as Burke was able to pop open himself. Not able to get around Burke as easily in the 2nd quarter and if anything was forcing his offense more than Sessions did. Only had 6pts after the break, although some of them were timely, and during the Quarter the Offense Died (the 13pt 3rd quarter that nearly sunk us) we could have really used something. He did finally broke a long drought for us at the 7min mark of the quarter with one of his pullups, but that would be his only points in the quarter, and he missed what looked like an open baseline layup that would have put up by 4. Down the stretch Rudy was the man on offense, but DC chipped in with a little midrange jumper after he passed on the three and decide to dribble into a little more comfortable distance for him, and he forced a tough drive into traffic with us up 7, got to the line and pushed it back to 9. Not actually a great decision there actually as he kind of got bailed out, but that happened several times this game. His final statline remained efficient, but it feels at times he's pressing without Cousins out there--Brick
 
Last edited:
Bench

Stats: 30min 16pts (6-12, 2-4, 1-1) 8reb 1ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Stauskas ( B+ ) -- Well, what a nice surprise. The fact that I'm saying that is somewhat of a surprise. I didn't think it would take this many games into the season before I'd be able to write something positive about Stauskas. However, it didn't start out that way. Collison immediately fed him the ball when he entered the game and he missed an open three. The next time down the floor he was once again fed the ball. He put it on the floor and missed a pull up fourteen footer. My thought at that moment was, oh no, here we go again. But Malone seemed determined to stick with him and let him fight through it. Nik rewarded him by hitting an open three. He followed that by hitting a pull up sixteen footer, and ended his stay in the first half by nailing an eighteen footer. He started the second half the same way he started the game, by missing his first three shots, the third one a terrible looking ten foot floater that he left about two feet short. But he came right back and hit an eighteen footer off a pick. He then hit his second three of the night. He closed out his scoring by driving the lane through traffic, getting bumped and fouled, but managing to get a shot up off the glass that went in. He followed by hitting his only freethrow. So a nice night for him offensively, and he pulled down eight rebounds. So the stars were aligned and all was right with the world. At least for one night. Defensively it was a bit of a mixed bag. He had a few bad moments, and he had some very good moments. Twice he found someone else's man and got there in time to prevent an open shot. He batted the ball away once under the basket, only to have it bounce right to Kanter for an easy basket. He had some trouble staying in front of Burks, but mostly when fighting through screens. On the other hand, he did a good job of staying in front of Trey Burke on one occasion. It was his best night as a King so far, and lets hope its a sign of more to come. --Baja

Stats: 15min 6pts (1-2, 0-0, 4-4) 1reb 1ast 0stl 0blk 2TO
Landry ( C- ) -- Landry was mostly a non-factor tonight. He had a tough matchup against Rudy Gobert where Landry's max vertical is probably less than Gobert's standing reach. Needless to say, he didn't do much of anything on the boards and had a tough time scoring against Gobert's length. Thankfully, he didn't try to force much, but he also didn't really help the team while he was out on the floor. --Hadlowe

Stats: 15min 7pts (3-7, 1-1, 0-0) 1reb 0ast 0stl 0blk 1TO
Williams ( C+ ) -- in a move I wasn't really pleased with came in the first quarter for Rudy, which meant Malone went back to the same DWill fascination he did at the start of the year and benched Casspi in the process. The results were...mixed. Of late there have been only two DWill modes: terrible bonehead lazy unplayable scrub, or OMG Greatest Player in the Universe!! during his several explosive hero off the bench late in games moments. Once again given a spot in the more normal rotation he was...somewhere in between. Was aggressive in the early going, but too aggressive. Always feels like he is looking to make a highlight reel play. Forced a tough post move that did not go in. Was too quick for himself trying some sort of post spin move from all the way up near the 3pt circle and threw it out of bounds on the spin. Finally got a score squirting through a little gap for the layin. Inefficient, but at least not he passive invisible waste of space he has been during his worst games. And when he returned in the 4th he made a couple of plays to help the cause. Got us an effort hoop in thee early 4th as he missed an attempt and then quickly mopped up and followed it (for his only board of the night per usual -- I could probably outrebound this kid just because I always thrived on physical banging whereas our 6'8" musclebound jumping bean forward runs screaming like he saw a spider). Added a three a minute later to give us a 5pt lead as we finally opened things up. 7pts on 7 shots ain't great efficiency when your primary contribution is scoring, but he was aggressive, what he did get looked good, and while I still would rather have had Casspi's grit than a flashy creampuff, you didn't feel like DWill's minutes were empty or that he desperately had to be pulled for somebody more productive. Yet another guy who just made some sort of contribution. --Brick

Stats: 11min 0pts (0-0, 0-0, 0-0) 2reb 0ast 1stl 0blk 1TO
Hollins ( C ) -- how to grade these things sometimes...The Good: played some good help defense on multiple occasions in both halves using his length to make some excellent defensive challenged on Kanter and Gobert away form the hoop. The Not So Good: showed abysmal reactions on the defensive boards against Gobert as Gobert just pounded him, and us, in there, and for some particularly silly reason we tried to post him too, and, uh...no. He's on the team for the defense though, so this largely becomes a balancing act between the good defensive stands and the poor rebounding. --Brick

Stats: 16min 6pts (2-5, 0-0, 2-5) 3reb 4ast 1stl 0blk 2TO
Sessions ( B- ) -- numbers aren't great, but I will say this: I might have been happier with Ramon's first half minutes in this one than I have been with any stint he has yet had as a King. He flat was doing a real nice job not only driving and dishing, but also floor generaling and making sure all the right guys were getting the ball. It might have been the first time all year I've truly felt like he was in control of the situation out there, and he did it despite being harassed by Dante Exum looming over him with his length. Per my notes, I actually had him down as the better Kings PG of the first half. Unfortunately when he returned in the third it was closer to the same bad Sessions forcing drives and making turnovers. But the wild strategy bore some fruit with 39 seconds to go when he flipped up a flailing layup +1. Of course he them missed the FT, Carl got called for an offensive foul trying to retrieve it, and the Jazz got to go to the other end to tie it. And that was only the first of 3 straight headslapping missed FTs in the final minute of the third, as he missed a pair on the next possession. 4th quarter minutes were mercifully uneventful, and still going to count the excellent first half work more heavily than the shaky return. It was a definite step forward, and yes, Sessions too contributed. --Brick
 
Last edited:
Was at the game tonight, can't see everything in as much detail compared to being at home, but a few things.

Was great to see Nik hit some shots, board, push with the ball. Better give him a B+ or higher Brick.

Evans had terrible hands tonight, Sessions finally walked out of the morgue.

Why didn't Casspi play? They say anything in the broadcast?
 
Was at the game tonight, can't see everything in as much detail compared to being at home, but a few things.

Was great to see Nik hit some shots, board, push with the ball. Better give him a B+ or higher Brick.

Evans had terrible hands tonight, Sessions finally walked out of the morgue.

Why didn't Casspi play? They say anything in the broadcast?

We play the Lakers tomorrow. Malone mentioned something about being glad he didn't need Casspi tonight.
 
Was at the game tonight, can't see everything in as much detail compared to being at home, but a few things.

Was great to see Nik hit some shots, board, push with the ball. Better give him a B+ or higher Brick.

Evans had terrible hands tonight, Sessions finally walked out of the morgue.

Why didn't Casspi play? They say anything in the broadcast?

He gave Williams minutes at the 3 and the matchups didn't allow a stretch 4, where Casspi could play with Williams. We know what Casspi gives us, but they're continuing to "probe and prod" to see if they can squeeze more out of Williams
 
#First things first, the Jazz are beyond terrible, my lord I have no idea they were that crap.
#JT/Collison/Reggie had good glue guy games all helped a lot
#Gay was the difference between us winning/losing, his talent won it for us
#Sessions and Nik for the first time ever both played well.
#Derrick while statistically didn't do much, his tip in and 3 pointer in the 4th were HUGE in giving us a break, he did play with energy again.
#Mclemore was ok did little things,
#Surprised Casspi didn't play
#Rudy Gobert looks like he's going to be decent, if I'm the Jazz I would move on from Kantar (he's a scrub) and play Gobert more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwc
ben needs to lockdown kobe tomorrow and nik can come through and hit some shots again

At this point in Kobe's career, I basically dare him to shoot. The scouting report on him says the team is better when he gets others involved and worse when he shoots 30+ times.
 
Just don't do that in the last few mins, that guy is so clutch, I'd be afraid of him in a wheelchair and 90 with a final possession shot.
He's been the opposite of clutch in just about every close game they have been in this year cause he's so fatigued from jacking up shots early in the game.
 
He's been the opposite of clutch in just about every close game they have been in this year cause he's so fatigued from jacking up shots early in the game.

That's sad if it is finally true, no love for the Lakers at all, but if he can't be counted on in the final minute, not the way I want to see him end his career. If he wasn't making so much money would be better to see him retire. Lot of money to give up though.
 
i stand by my comments, lock him down from the start. Our team is better then theirs straight up.

the last thing you want is kobe seeing the dam ball going through the net and his legs and confidence coming back. We're kings, he's a laker, its bound to happen.

Lock him down straight up
 
The main reason the Kings won tonight is because the Jazz couldn't hit their open shots.

They wouldn't have won against probably 25 other teams tonight.
Not comforted with this win whatsoever, but at least it provides succor in the standings.

Loved what coach said after the game:
I got on our guys, you know - I'm tired of "My Bad, My Bad."
"My Bad" gets your ass beat in the NBA.
No more "My Bads" - do your job. Do your job.
 
Yeah, a win is a win. Plus this game just may help Nik to begin to breakout. Then if Ben get his 15+ a night......well things would look up. Learning to play without Cuz will be a big deal when he does come back. If only JT would get 15/10 on a regular basis.......
 
The main reason the Kings won tonight is because the Jazz couldn't hit their open shots.

They wouldn't have won against probably 25 other teams tonight.
Not comforted with this win whatsoever, but at least it provides succor in the standings.

Loved what coach said after the game:
I got on our guys, you know - I'm tired of "My Bad, My Bad."
"My Bad" gets your ass beat in the NBA.
No more "My Bads" - do your job. Do your job.

Couldn't agree more!!!!
 
I loved that "My bad" phrase from Coach Malone...it comes around a little too often. As another poster said, Utah couldn't shoot it into the stratosphere tonight and that Kings were fortunate enough to be facing a team that actually shot worse than the Kings did because on most nights the Kings will do the oppositions the honor of not being able to shoot a lick from distance. A win's a win I guess...we won't win these next two games anyways.
 
I loved that "My bad" phrase from Coach Malone...it comes around a little too often. As another poster said, Utah couldn't shoot it into the stratosphere tonight and that Kings were fortunate enough to be facing a team that actually shot worse than the Kings did because on most nights the Kings will do the oppositions the honor of not being able to shoot a lick from distance. A win's a win I guess...we won't win these next two games anyways.

Well, aren't you quite the beacon of optimism.

They play these games for a reason.
 
Something's been up with Carl Landry lately imo...his inside scoring has been far from consistent, he's too small to rebound(we've known this) and he's been getting a LOT of careless fouls early. He's supposed to be our "in control" veteran, but I see frustration getting the best of him more often than not. I want to see the first few games version of Carl back tonight...F*** Carlos Boozer
 
Something's been up with Carl Landry lately imo...his inside scoring has been far from consistent, he's too small to rebound(we've known this) and he's been getting a LOT of careless fouls early. He's supposed to be our "in control" veteran, but I see frustration getting the best of him more often than not. I want to see the first few games version of Carl back tonight...F*** Carlos Boozer

1. Sometimes being played at C
2. Lost athleticism hindering his ability to finish inside, especially against taller players
 
Something's been up with Carl Landry lately imo...his inside scoring has been far from consistent, he's too small to rebound(we've known this) and he's been getting a LOT of careless fouls early. He's supposed to be our "in control" veteran, but I see frustration getting the best of him more often than not. I want to see the first few games version of Carl back tonight...F*** Carlos Boozer

I agree with this, not sure what is up but his play since DeMarcus went down has been mysterious and disappointing. I almost half expected him to be moved into the starting lineup to try to make up for the scoring loss and get us 15ppg or some such. Maybe he did too or something, because instead of any of that happening, he's been increasingly benched, just when you thought he would be featured, and he's looked frustrated in doing so. He's averaging only 6.3pts/gm since DeMarcus went down, and counterintuitively is playing fewer minutes just when you would think he was needed most. Nobody's talking about it, but its been a factor in why we haven't stepped up here. He was maybe the one most obvious piece who seemed primed for a bigger role. Not happening.

On a tactical level in several games he's tininess has been a factor as we haven't even been able to throw it to him inside as taller players bracket him front and back, but his size hasn't changed any, that was always there.
 
I agree with this, not sure what is up but his play since DeMarcus went down has been mysterious and disappointing. I almost half expected him to be moved into the starting lineup to try to make up for the scoring loss and get us 15ppg or some such. Maybe he did too or something, because instead of any of that happening, he's been increasingly benched, just when you thought he would be featured, and he's looked frustrated in doing so. He's averaging only 6.3pts/gm since DeMarcus went down, and counterintuitively is playing fewer minutes just when you would think he was needed most. Nobody's talking about it, but its been a factor in why we haven't stepped up here. He was maybe the one most obvious piece who seemed primed for a bigger role. Not happening.

On a tactical level in several games he's tininess has been a factor as we haven't even been able to throw it to him inside as taller players bracket him front and back, but his size hasn't changed any, that was always there.

it is rather strange, isn't it? since demarcus has been out, the kings have occasionally run some interesting high-low action with jason thompson and reggie evans/derrick williams, where jason tosses entry passes over the top of the defense into evans or williams in the low-post, often right at the rim--which is basically where evans and williams need to catch it to be effective, absent as they are of anything resembling legitimate low-post skill. i don't know why landry hasn't been the beneficiary of similar offensive sets; he's got better hands than evans and williams, and if the defense rotates effectively, he can actually compensate with his feet and his uncommon patience down low. i simply haven't understood the move to involve reggie rather heavily on the offensive end, certainly not while we're seeing carl's confidence wane a bit...
 
I agree with this, not sure what is up but his play since DeMarcus went down has been mysterious and disappointing. I almost half expected him to be moved into the starting lineup to try to make up for the scoring loss and get us 15ppg or some such. Maybe he did too or something, because instead of any of that happening, he's been increasingly benched, just when you thought he would be featured, and he's looked frustrated in doing so. He's averaging only 6.3pts/gm since DeMarcus went down, and counterintuitively is playing fewer minutes just when you would think he was needed most. Nobody's talking about it, but its been a factor in why we haven't stepped up here. He was maybe the one most obvious piece who seemed primed for a bigger role. Not happening.

On a tactical level in several games he's tininess has been a factor as we haven't even been able to throw it to him inside as taller players bracket him front and back, but his size hasn't changed any, that was always there.
Ahem, I've talked about it several times. This morning in the coach malone ineptitude thread, game threads.

Carl is struggling. His lack of size is not aging well.

Been worried about Carl more than Ramon all year. Ramon seemed rusty, maybe out of shape. Who knows? Carl though, it's lack of size and diminished athleticism. Playing out of position. He's just not been effective. 5 of the first 9 he was in double figures. 2 of 12 since.

Malone can barely keep him on the court. Dwill is giving more right now.
 
Ahem, I've talked about it several times. This morning in the coach malone ineptitude thread, game threads.

Carl is struggling. His lack of size is not aging well.

Been worried about Carl more than Ramon all year. Ramon seemed rusty, maybe out of shape. Who knows? Carl though, it's lack of size and diminished athleticism. Playing out of position. He's just not been effective. 5 of the first 9 he was in double figures. 2 of 12 since.

Malone can barely keep him on the court. Dwill is giving more right now.

Its hard to clearly point to that for the recent slump though.

He wasn't struggling until our main guys started going down. Now he is. Might be coincidence, but its an odd one. He's the one guy you would have thought would have been least effected by the main guys going down. In fact he was the one guy with the game that could have benefitted from it. He creates his own shots, he's an offensive player, he was normally off the bench so his shots weren't being created by Cousins etc., and yet...

He was averaging 10pts 4.5reb in the 11 games before the Chicago game. He's been erratic ever since exactly when I would have expected his ppg to go up. He's gone from our best bencher to a nightly ? mark.
 
it is rather strange, isn't it? since demarcus has been out, the kings have occasionally run some interesting high-low action with jason thompson and reggie evans/derrick williams, where jason tosses entry passes over the top of the defense into evans or williams in the low-post, often right at the rim--which is basically where evans and williams need to catch it to be effective, absent as they are of anything resembling legitimate low-post skill. i don't know why landry hasn't been the beneficiary of similar offensive sets; he's got better hands than evans and williams, and if the defense rotates effectively, he can actually compensate with his feet and his uncommon patience down low. i simply haven't understood the move to involve reggie rather heavily on the offensive end, certainly not while we're seeing carl's confidence wane a bit...

.......a lot.

Perhaps Malone has to now focus on getting Carl going. His first task was to get Ben to improve apparently on defense and not offense, Nik is improving, Malone is playing Williams, and next the focus will be on Carl. Perhaps Carl is being ignored because it isn't his turn. I am being serious. There are a lot of players on this team who don't have a legitimate NBA game.
 
Back
Top