You can go ahead and bookmark this reply: Miller will start when he is healthy. Let's not get all out of sorts because a handful of games have been played well without him.While Cisco and Salmons have somewhat similar games and can cover 1-3 positions. Cisco is a great shoot blocker and is more athletic than Salmons. He also has a better range and can hit the 3 ball with some regularity. Salmons does the stuff that might not make the stats and he does it being totally cool about it knowing his role. I like him and wonder how he does it without being more athletic, but he does the job just not flashy. His big contract is flashy though I must say.
I'm all for starting SAR the rest of the season and having SAR back up K9 and give Brad big minutes too, sort of a different way of looking at it. I would not break up this streak we have going, even though it sucks to lose your starting job when you are hurt, SAR lost his to K9 and Brad should lose his to SAR if SAR and K9 continue to play so good together. We are missing Brad though, we are missing a backup 4 & 5 for sure. While Williamson is doing better, we still need a backup 4 and definately a 5. If SAR continues to start then Brad can back him up, while SAR has the utility of subbing in for K9 at the 4 and Brad at the 5, I don't think it's fair to have him be forced back into this role, Brad needs to prove he deserves to start again. Which I think he will do after a little while, at any rate we are 1-2 7 footers away from what we need. I envy the teams like Dallas that have the trio of 7 footers they keep bringing in off the bench. Diop, Dampier, and DJ is a great rotation. I really wish we could have Dampier, him and Muss have a good past.
Well, to be fair, Corliss had ONE good game.
Brick i think you were to generous to Kevin. I love what he is doing. But alot has been said about our stagnant offense tonight and Kevin was not moving tonight like he has been. He wasn't getting out on breaks as usual or slashing to basket. I think that he fell in love with the 3 tonight and so that is where he stood for most of the time and it showed in the final score. He don't need to become that type of player for us.
Brick i think you were to generous to Kevin. I love what he is doing. But alot has been said about our stagnant offense tonight and Kevin was not moving tonight like he has been. He wasn't getting out on breaks as usual or slashing to basket. I think that he fell in love with the 3 tonight and so that is where he stood for most of the time and it showed in the final score. He don't need to become that type of player for us.
Seems like the Grizz were just on fire this game. But I would still like to know if there was the general activity on defense from the Kings. Was the effort there?
Now that I think about it, they could be possibly saving their energy for the b2b game aginst the Spurs tomorrow. Payback?
Chucky Atkins ( F ) -- what the hell was that Chucky? I mean, WTF? Save it for the Lakers -- they traded you, not us.
Yeah, they do seem to give the Kings fits. Hopefully we can change that tomorrow.Tomorrow is going to be tough. Golden State usually gives us a tought time...
There is ZERO chance that the TDM award can go to anyone but Chucky Atkins...
The key word being "almost?"At one point I almost said, "ENOUGH!"![]()
Well, to be fair, Corliss had ONE good game.
He's not looking bad out there, but he's not really igniting it either.
Eh?Under the original rules Chucky cant get the TDM award because he never played for the Kings![]()
Brick i think you were to generous to Kevin. I love what he is doing. But alot has been said about our stagnant offense tonight and Kevin was not moving tonight like he has been. He wasn't getting out on breaks as usual or slashing to basket. I think that he fell in love with the 3 tonight and so that is where he stood for most of the time and it showed in the final score. He don't need to become that type of player for us.