[Grades] Grades v. Bulls 2/14/12

Who was most responsible for us almost pulling this off?

  • Cousins

    Votes: 38 82.6%
  • Reke

    Votes: 6 13.0%
  • Thronton

    Votes: 2 4.3%

  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
Good loss!

Entrenched and continuing problems include: terrible vets wasting our money and minutes, a SF hole, and our offense improving much more than our defense. And basically with the exception of IT, everything we did this summer looks cruddy/like it made us weaker.

However:
Cousins 28pts 17reb 2ast 3stl 2blk
Reke 27pts 8reb 8ast at least 2 uncredited steals 1blk
Thronton 23pts 2reb 2ast

and solid roleplayer work from JT, IT and Donte. Worth noting BTW that 5 of those 6 guys have never played for anybody but the Kings.

There was hope and a lot to like. Defense let us down. Empty minutes guys let us down. Now if we could just get our main guys some support.

In honor of all of our summer acquisitions putting up the suckiest seasons of their careers, and looking like pale imitations of themselves: Theme = Bad Cover Songs

Boxscore

P.S. Despite what you may have heard from certain national media sources, apparently a big step was also taken tonight toward keeping the Kings in Sacramento with a unanimous Sac city council vote.

Salmons ( F ) -- New evidence has arrived that the sheep in John's blackmail pictures of Smart were wearing bondage gear. This situation is just ridiulous. Terrible again, pinned and posted by Deng to star things off. Looked like he felt left out early and so abruptly forced a bad 1 on 1 jumper after we had been getting all good shots. Was just the beggining of the offensive woes as he missed pullup after pullup, some of them closer to being part of the offense than others. Was at least not completely lit up by "All Star" Luol Deng, but on the other hand Deng was playing point forward and finished with a nice 23pts 11ast (to John's 3pts 2ast on 1-8 shooting). But Coach just wouldn't take him out no matter how badly he was scuttling us. This with Donte having played a very strong first half. Not sure exactly what Donte has to do to get the coach's attention in that position, but its clearly not a position that's being decided on merit. When your stars come up with 28pts 17reb and 27pts 8reb 8ast all you need is just a little help, just a little, to win the game. John couldn't provide it.
Freddie who?

Thompson ( B ) -- game us a nice roleplaying game next to Cousins that was marred by his compelte inability to stop Carlos Boozer. Was active on the glass, and on the offensive boards in particular saved our bacon on numerous possessins with putbacks and snatching long rebounds and clearing them to give us extra chances. But even when he played sound technical defense, was in his stance, did not get beat to the hoop, challenged the shot...well Boozer is overpaid and erratic, but he's quite good and JT never even slowed him.
Oh look, its a Disney bred wannabe version of punk rock. This would have been Avril's version, except there she just didn't have the voice for it. This, however....

Cousins ( A ) -- after getting it stolen on his first offensive move, let the Bulls know what kind of night it was going to be with a brilliant sequence moving his feet and blocking a shot along the baseline, grabbing the resulting board, and then firing a fullcourt outlet pass to Thronton for the layup. Was attacking Noah from all angles with drives, jumpers, post moves. Not everything was going and there was some slop, but he was very aggressive and putting up big numbers. Another amazing sequence late in the half throwing up a brick, chasing it down with the great hands, then spinning along the baseline for a reverse layup avoiding Noah's block attempt. Finally got slowed by his old pal foul trouble in the second half, but it only shaved a few minutes (he still played 37) rather than throwing him off his game. Even added a three at the 33 second mark as we staged our furioyus comeback -- a shot he should have taken, and that we needed. Followed that by playing good defense on Lucas at the three point line forcing the miss on the other end. And so here we are again. Too many turnovers, some wild shots. Noah got his points, albeit not by beating DeMarcus one on one, but rather by the Bulls offensive scheme repeatedly beating our defnsive scheme and leaving Noah open under the hoop when DeMarcus has to step out on somebody. Adn yet anybody focusing on those things is completely missing the forest for the trees. DeMarcus showing now why you always bank on talent, and always bank on size, no matter how big a pain in the *** it can be. At this rate may have better numbers than any center in the All Star game besides Dwight by the time the game actually rolls around. 7gms in February so far: 20.0pts 13.0reb 0.9ast 1.1stl 1.1blk 2.7TO.
Somebody alert PETA -- I would like to report somebody strangling a cat onstage. This is the endstage of all those interesting/sexy raspy voiced singers out there.

Thornton ( B- ) -- quiet first half, but at least did not force enough to become disruptive. Came out for the third looking to score and gave us a quick boost to start the quarter. His game tonight had an odd ebb and flow to it though, and he was soon back to ebb and making some disturbingly selfish decisions again. Forcing, but giving us points we needed in the late 3rd and just kept on having little surges through the 4th. In particular got better at just taking passes and shooting rather than catching them and pointlessly trying to do something off the dribble rather than taking the assist. And next thing you know the guy who had 4pts at half has become our 3rd 20pt scorer of the game, and he came up with a huge contended three at the 15 second mark to make the lead 2 and give us a real chance. Erratic effectiveness may have been because he was more clearly a third option tonight, depsite his attempts to force up occasional shots. And unlike Reke and Cousins who can sustain high levels of play with their all around games even when not scoring, Marcus has if anything grown more one dimensional this season, and if he hasn't shot it for a few minutes he gets noticeably twitchy .
Celine Dion. Doing AC/DC. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Too be fair whoever the other chick was took a slightly better shot at it. Very slightly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evans ( A ) -- aggressive and looked like he could take his men whenever he felt, but doing a nice job setting others up too. I had to disagree with someone saying Reke wasn't playign well in the modest statistical first half (7pts 4reb 2ast). I actually thought he was doing a very nice job getting everybody involved, and could easily have had a number of other assists. Several tough layups rolled off as well, but not because the defense had him bottled. Even got his hands on a number of balls on defense too that did not get credited as steals -- one of them in particular I am just flabergasted give nt hat he ran up behind the guy,m took the ball right out of his hands, gathered it up, then started the break with it. I mean...what defines a steal then? Was it because he briefly dropped it after knocking it away? Just bizarre. Anyway, was quietly playing a solid game fascilitating things, and then came out the second half and got unquiet on his way to a 20pt 4reb 6ast half. Came on in the third and made a nig play in the mid quarter scoring through contact for a +1 power drive to cut the lead to 3 and get the 4th on Boozer, who had to leave the game and was never a major facotr therafter. Followed that with a spectacular take setting up and crossing over Ronnie Brewer, who can match Reke's size and is a good defender. Strong takes to the hoop in the final minutes actually got us as close as 6 with less then two minutes to go as we nearly pulled this thing off and at one point scored TWENTY points in 3 1/2 minutes. Mind you this is a Bulls team that came in allowing opponents to score 87 pts/gm. We dropped 115 on them, and Reke was at the center of a lot of that. Just for gravy, had to guard Deng down the stretch of the 4th as we settled into a smallball look, and did a better job on him defensively than our SFs had. Since we don't actually require you to compelte the 30-10-10 triple double around here to get an A, that's what we'll call this one.
Haha! This was easily the best laugh I have had all week. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Give them a minute to truly warm to the task, give them 3 and they'll have you falling out of your chair.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bench

Hickson ( D+ ) -- you could just sense what was wrong here. In case you missed it, under Smart we have finally become an organized team, with stars and people who are supposed to play roles. The stars are Reke, Cousins and Thornton, who took 18, 20 and 19 shots respectively. The roleplayers are everybody else, only 1 of whom (Salmons) took as many as 8 shots. Problem is that several of our "everybody elses" are used to getting shots like they themselves were stars. And with JJ that means that after you don't get an early shot, you force up a tough catapult off the glass against pressure that has no chance, but hey, at least you got off a shot. After using his athleticism in a couple of tough finishes at the rim set up by Thomas responded to the Bulls taking the largest lead of the game in the early 4th by chucking up a 20 foot jumper. That went well. Ineffective defensively against Gibson.
Because who better to cover Johnny Cash than Olivia Newton John?

Hayes ( D ) -- some pretty decent defensive work squandered as he missed easy shot after easy shot triggering Bulls breaks again and again.In theory his game should be one of the easiest and most universal to apply, but his complete offensive ineptitutde and worse yet apparent determination to shoot anyway is taking mediocre boarding/defedning nights and turning them into disasters.
What grunge would have been with guys in hawaiian shirts and pretty boy preppy lead singers tearing off their t-shirts and hopping around to the delight of 13yr old girls.

Greene ( B ) -- helped keep us in things with back to back hoops in the mid 2nd and canned another three for his 10th point to get us back within 4 at half. Wasn't just scoring either, gave us a boost off the bench by making smart plays, which he may have done more of this year than all 3 of his previous years combined. And his reward for the good work? He gets to sit and watch Salmons bungle about for most of the 3rd quarter before finally getting inserted for about 4-5 min in the late 3rd/early 4th 9whihc were not as effective). So, Salmons plays 25+min puts up 3pts 1reb on 1-8 shooting, Donte plays 13+min and puts up 10pts 4reb on 4-6 shooting (which if he got Salmons minutes is basically the pace for 19pts 7reb). Hmm..19pt 7reb pace guy, or 3pts 1reb pace guy...I choose 3pt 1 reb!!! Ummm...?
Now see, I was torn here whether to include this in Bad Covers or a potential upcoming Good Covers theme.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thomas ( B ) -- lit up by Lucas after entering, and made the shaky decision to feed Hayes in the post. But had a c couple nice little setups of Hickson for tough layups. When he returned late in the game was still getting torched by Lucas, but responded with a drive+1 of his own, added some FTs, and earned a spot as one of our 4th quarter Thomas/Thornton/Reke/Jt/Cuz Party of Five that came all the way back.
Just a few words of wisdom from, ahem, Justin Bieber. Enjoy.


Garcia ( INC ) -- did little in his first half minutes other than watch Korver spring three and bomb threes on us
Like shooting fish in a barrel. I should feel bad. But I don't.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reke played a great game, but I have to vote for Cousins here. Reke just has to stop taking those long jumpers with lots of time on the clock. He's converting at something like 30% on those. Even counting for Cousins' insane offensive board abilities, that's about 2/3 of a turnover every shot.
 
Good loss!

Entrenched and continuing problems include: terrible vets wasting our money and minutes, a SF hole, and our offense improving much more than our defense. And basically with the exception of IT, everything we did this summer looks cruddy/like it made us weaker.

However:
Cousins 28pts 17reb 2ast 3stl 2blk
Reke 27pts 8reb 8ast at least 2 uncredited steals 1blk
Thronton 23pts 2reb 2ast

and solid roleplayer work from JT, IT and Donte.

There ws hope and a lot to like. Defense let us down. Empty minutes guys let us down. Now if we could jsut get those guys some support.

In honor of all of our summer acquisitions putting up the suckiest seasons of their careers, Theme = Bad Cover Songs

Boxscore

placeholder...

Who???

It's actually getting to the point where I'm thinking maybe the poor guy ought to just change his name, like Keith Richard(s).
 
I think we would have won if not for more crappy substitutions, made worse of course by those completely ineffective players themselves. If JT plays a few more mins, a few less for JJ, Donte plays just 6-8 mins more, and Salmons 6-8 mins less, and no wasted mins from Cisco, I believe we're celebrating right now.

Reke/Cousins/Thornton were great in the 2nd half. JT is looking like the best pairing by far for Cousins of anyone on our roster. Needs more mins, period.

Really, our vets completely let us down. Just didn't contribute anything. JJ/Hayes can NOT play as much together. That's where we lost the game. Far too many easy baskets inside, and most happened when those two were out there together. Play JT with either of them. This club needs either JT or Cousins on the floor as much as possible.

I guess it's a positive that we're coming so close, despite the horrible sub pattern, which theoretically should be pretty easy to fix. but we're continuously having to play uphill, and expend a lot of energy just to get back into the game, after Smarts 2nd quarter substitutions. It happens just about every game. If he would just stop playing our stubby, offensively challenged, defensively invisible combo of Hayes/JJ for the majority of 2nd quarters, and would stop gifting Salmons so many damn mins, our starters should have more energy at the end given they wouldn't be battling back from the deficit the bench keeps giving up.

Smart said a couple days ago he wants to play the bench unit together. That's a mistake imo. Putting IT/Cisco/JJ/hayes lineup out there at the same time won't work, and statistically, it's one of the worst possible defensive combos we can put out there. Instead, I propose, MIX in the bench players with the starters. Novel idea, I know.
 
Last edited:
I do not feel badly about this loss. There was heart, there was hustle, there was determination and there was grit. The Chicago Bulls, even with Rose on the bench, are not some second-rate team. They're the real deal.
 
If we had consistency from everyone we would have 3 or 4 more wins, unfortunately cousins seems to be the only consistent player we have, everyone else shows up one night then takes the next night off
 
I do not feel badly about this loss. There was heart, there was hustle, there was determination and there was grit. The Chicago Bulls, even with Rose on the bench, are not some second-rate team. They're the real deal.

i dont feel bad about the loss. but i do feel after watching the game that it was winnable. that is what hurt. if before the game you would have told me we would only lose by 6 to the bulls and not get blown out, i would have taken it. but watching and seeing that just a sub here and a play there, we could have won. i dont feel bad about the loss, i feel sad about it
 
DMC and Reke's stats are awesome.

Can't wait for Smart to give Tyler some really good burns though. I think the kid would be awesome addition to Smart's running game. At his age and being 6'8", he should be able to outrun all the SF on this team and do it every night. And legit UCLA stars always excel in the NBA, check out Love, Westbrook, etc.
 
DMC and Reke's stats are awesome.

Can't wait for Smart to give Tyler some really good burns though. I think the kid would be awesome addition to Smart's running game. At his age and being 6'8", he should be able to outrun all the SF on this team and do it every night. And legit UCLA stars always excel in the NBA, check out Love, Westbrook, etc.
I wouldn't mind starting Greene and giving Honeycutt bench minutes. Obviously its unlikely but not impossible for us to make a big push for the playoffs this year, but we really need to see if Greene can become a starting sf caliber player, and see what Honeycutt can do. At this point John Salmons is pretty useless, his shooting is erratic and hid defense is hit and miss. We should really try and package Salmons and Hickson and get an upgrade at sf or another big.
 
I wouldn't mind starting Greene and giving Honeycutt bench minutes. Obviously its unlikely but not impossible for us to make a big push for the playoffs this year, but we really need to see if Greene can become a starting sf caliber player, and see what Honeycutt can do. At this point John Salmons is pretty useless, his shooting is erratic and hid defense is hit and miss. We should really try and package Salmons and Hickson and get an upgrade at sf or another big.

Would not be surprised to see us go that route next year (replacing Donte with a 1st round draft pick is likely as well)
 
I think we would have won if not for more crappy substitutions, made worse of course by those completely ineffective players themselves.
Ditto this whole post.

It was so painfully obvious that when all our bench players were in the 2nd qtr, there was simply no way they could compete.

The Kings bench is KILLING them. When DMC leaves the floor, they simply cannot get a rebound to save their lives.
Of course, EVERYone is making SO many mistakes that I'm shocked they end up being close games at all.
Any one of those double-digit mistakes that cost 2-3 points each didn't happen, and the Kings quite probably win this one.
All it takes is to prevent ONE boneheaded play each game, and they start winning these - think about that for a second.

And if they stop half the boneheaded plays? They win going away, against the best team in the East, after somehow winning against the best team in the West WITH tons of boneheaded plays still.

The Kings literally give away 20+ points a game through sheer stupidity that high school teams are taught not to do (leaving 3-pt shooters and big men wide open to uselessly step towards the ballhandler for the most part).
 
I hope we end the Lin train tomorrow

But, we're most likely gonna get blitzed to death
Tyreke is really gonna have to give Lin some space and force him to show he can hit the outside shot consitently, also go right at him on offense as well(2nd night of back to back and Lin has showed he has conditioning issues, naturally from not being used to playing so much.) But yeah we couldn't have caught the Knicks at a worse time tbh. That kids confidence will be sky high after that game winner.
 
Our vets didn't play too well tonight. But instead of the team throwing them out how about learning to play a little more consistently better in EACH game. I've seen, personally, two lousy I mean really lousy games in a row at Arco and the "vets" were not the problem then. Just a thought to keep a little balance here.
 
John Salmons is awful. Enough said.

And Chuck Hayes is something else... I appreciate the "intangibles" he brings, but every time he gets onto the court the Kings are crippled. He's 6'6, plays PF/C, can't jump, is worthless on offense... He's the type of guy a good team who can cover his obvious flaws need... He only makes a bad team worse.
 
Tyreke/Thornton/Salmons lineup = F

Reke/Thornton/IT lineup = A

Connect the dots.

The Tyreke/Thornton/Salmons lineup was gawdawful. The ball didn't move, one on one BS that we know too, too well. No way in hell do I give Tyreke an A for this game. Not only is Tyreke inconsistent between games; he's inconsistent within the game. He continues to demonstrate to me that he's not pg material. The Kings management will make a change within the next year in which they bring in a veteran pg to take over those duties from Tyreke. Bank on it.

Regarding the defensive end of the floor, Tyreke should get an F. Leaving Korver wide open is the sin of sins. And it was done repeatedly. Unforgivable and unforgettable. Tyreke was doing the "guarding nobody" routine that was demonstrated visually by a poster previously. You're in your 3rd year in the NBA, Tyreke. That's just brain-dead.
(I know, Westphal did it). Rotations were poor overall in this game. How often did we see a Bull just cruise down the lane for a layup or slam dunk?

Cousins played fantastic. Without Cousins, this game would have been a total blowout. Greene was good as well.
 
Last edited:
The WORST cover version of a classic song for soooo many reasons, not the least of which is unforgivable change to the lyrics and the butchering of Entwistle's solo - as a bassist that one hurts. Enjoy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hope I don't die before I get old?!!?!?!?!
You've GOt to be *%$% kidding me!

That is a pretty horrendous cover.
The Bieber cover of Let It Be actually wasn't that bad. His voice sucks, but you take that away and the instrumental is rousing. Good enough piano work - and I can't stand Bieber.

As for Britney:
3907460836_b2eb0c2c50.jpg

If by "worst cover" you mean best cover of Satisfaction, yeah I'd agree with you. ;)

And yeah, that Pink Floyd group was amazingly bad - it shows stupendous delusional abilities for them to keep going in that song - they had no business playing that on stage - the bassist simply could not follow any beat, and was keying off the singer not the drummer. Tore every single musical phrase every time he was an entire beat late on the downbeat. Maybe he thought it was in 5/4 and everyone else knew it was 4/4? :p

As for Katy Perry, Celine Dion, Bonnie Tyler, etc - It's amazing how many vocalists get paid and an audience when they objectively sound terrible singing that song. Don't they have ears?
 
John Salmons is awful. Enough said.

And Chuck Hayes is something else... I appreciate the "intangibles" he brings, but every time he gets onto the court the Kings are crippled. He's 6'6, plays PF/C, can't jump, is worthless on offense... He's the type of guy a good team who can cover his obvious flaws need... He only makes a bad team worse.

Hayes does a couple of things pretty well. His post D is among the best in the league, minus any ability to block a post shot. He sets good screens, passes pretty well out of the high post, and boxes out bigger men very well. I love having him against any post threat. He is completely wasted against the Bulls second unit, though because that threat isn't in the post. I would rather have had him start to check Boozer last night and Thompson come off the bench to bang with the more athletic Asik and Gibson. That also gives the Kings the benefit of having a post scoring threat on the floor at all times.
 
John Salmons is awful. Enough said.

And Chuck Hayes is something else... I appreciate the "intangibles" he brings, but every time he gets onto the court the Kings are crippled. He's 6'6, plays PF/C, can't jump, is worthless on offense... He's the type of guy a good team who can cover his obvious flaws need... He only makes a bad team worse.

I think Hayes would be much better on the floor with Thompson than with Hickson. That said, I still want Thompson on the floor with Cousins to start. I guess that says more about Hickson than anything else. There's a little too much ME in Hicksons game. Whereas Thompson will just do whatever is needed to win. The minute we have Hickson and Hayes on the floor together, our rebounding goes down the toilet. Hickson fails to rotate too much for my liking. He'll grab a spectacular rebound, and then be a spectator from 15 feet the rest of the time. To be honest, the way Donte is playing right now, I'd rather give him more minutes at PF along with his minutes at SF. Hell, I'd rather stick Whiteside out there for a couple of minutes and let him learn.

The two players that are killing the Kings with little contribution are Salmons and Hickson. Hopefully Petrie can pull off a miracle by the trade deadline, because I'm getting sick of watching Salmons stink up the place.
 
I think Hayes would be much better on the floor with Thompson than with Hickson. That said, I still want Thompson on the floor with Cousins to start. I guess that says more about Hickson than anything else. There's a little too much ME in Hicksons game. Whereas Thompson will just do whatever is needed to win. The minute we have Hickson and Hayes on the floor together, our rebounding goes down the toilet. Hickson fails to rotate too much for my liking. He'll grab a spectacular rebound, and then be a spectator from 15 feet the rest of the time. To be honest, the way Donte is playing right now, I'd rather give him more minutes at PF along with his minutes at SF. Hell, I'd rather stick Whiteside out there for a couple of minutes and let him learn.

The two players that are killing the Kings with little contribution are Salmons and Hickson. Hopefully Petrie can pull off a miracle by the trade deadline, because I'm getting sick of watching Salmons stink up the place.

I'd be on board with that. Overall, the pf position has been below my expectations. If we draft one this year, it will be "filling a need" imo.
 
Tyreke/Thornton/Salmons lineup = F

Reke/Thornton/IT lineup = A

Connect the dots.

The Tyreke/Thornton/Salmons lineup was gawdawful. The ball didn't move, one on one BS that we know too, too well. No way in hell do I give Tyreke an A for this game. Not only is Tyreke inconsistent between games; he's inconsistent within the game. He continues to demonstrate to me that he's not pg material. The Kings management will make a change within the next year in which they bring in a veteran pg to take over those duties from Tyreke. Bank on it.

Regarding the defensive end of the floor, Tyreke should get an F. Leaving Korver wide open is the sin of sins. And it was done repeatedly. Unforgivable and unforgettable. Tyreke was doing the "guarding nobody" routine that was demonstrated visually by a poster previously. You're in your 3rd year in the NBA, Tyreke. That's just brain-dead.
(I know, Westphal did it). Rotations were poor overall in this game. How often did we see a Bull just cruise down the lane for a layup or slam dunk?

Cousins played fantastic. Without Cousins, this game would have been a total blowout. Greene was good as well.

WOW.

I feel very fortunate to point out just how full of manure that is. I mean wow. That's just terrible.

I went back and rewatched the first 15 minutes of each half. here's how Tyreke "F" Evans did on defense:

1st: In the first quarter he guarded Brewer except on one switch onto Watson. His opponents scored ZERO points on him the entire quarter.

2nd: In the first 3-4 min of the second quarter, until he went out Korve scored ZERO points against him. Korver did have a three, but it was in transtion off of a missed Reke layup that sent him into teh photographers, so obviously it was not Reke's responsiblity to get to Korver at that line.
--I don't know what happened in the rest of the 2nd except that Korver hit a three and a two with Cisco guarding him.

3rd: In the third, Reke was guarding Brewer again. And for the quarter Brewer scored ZERO points against him again. Brewer did get one early hoop, but it was agaisnt JT on a switch. Reke switched onto Gibson once, and stoned him in the post.

4th: In the first 3-4 min of the 4th Reke's men, you guessed it, scored ZERO points against him. Korver did drain another three, but he was being guarded by Donte up top not Reke, on that play.
--Now I did not rewatch the rest of that quarter either, but I do know that the rest of Korver's scoring consisted of 4 clutch FTs and ONE big three hit right in Reke's face -- the defense and challenge were good. Korver was better.

And so then we have you:
Regarding the defensive end of the floor, Tyreke should get an F.

And given that in my review of 30 of Reke's 40 minutes he allowed ZERO points, and that Korver drained exactly ONE shot on him, perhaps you might come to see that you are not exactly wachign these games through the fairest lenses when it comes to Reke.

P.S. Oh, and BTW, we scored 115pts against a Chicago team leading the league by only allowing 87 per game coming in. No other team in the league had done that this year. Meaning no other "magicial veteran PG who will fix everything" had led their team to as much success against that defense as Reke led his to yesterday.
 
Last edited:
I think Hayes would be much better on the floor with Thompson than with Hickson. That said, I still want Thompson on the floor with Cousins to start. I guess that says more about Hickson than anything else.

Like I said in other posts. JT should be coming off the bench. We lose way too much when both him and Cuz are off the floor. JJ and Hayes give up too many offensive rebounds.

Oh, Donte has improved his rebounding a ot this year. He's getting more in the paint than long rebounds on the wing.
 
Hickson/Hayes isn't cutting it off the bench. Hayes is steady, but plays with no energy. Hickson looks lost when he doesn't get the ball and is dumber than a bag of rocks. We need a sparkplug big who ignites the team with hustle. Man, I miss Brockman.
 
WOW.

I feel very fortunate to point out just how full of manure that is. I mean wow. That's just terrible.

I went back and rewatched the first 15 minutes of each half. here's how Tyreke "F" Evans did on defense:

1st: In the first quarter he guarded Brewer except on one switch onto Watson. His opponents scored ZERO points on him the entire quarter.

2nd: In the first 3-4 min of the second quarter, until he went out Korve scored ZERO points against him. Korver did have a three, but it was in transtion off of a missed Reke layup that sent him into teh photographers, so obviously it was not Reke's responsiblity to get to Korver at that line.
--I don't know what happened in the rest of the 2nd except that Korver hit a three and a two with Cisco guarding him.

3rd: In the third, Reke was guarding Brewer again. And for the quarter Brewer scored ZERO points against him again. Brewer did get one early hoop, but it was agaisnt JT on a switch. Reke switched onto Gibson once, and stoned him in the post.

4th: In the first 3-4 min of the 4th Reke's men, you guessed it, scored ZERO points against him. Korver did drain another three, but he was being guarded by Donte up top not Reke, on that play.
--Now I did not rewatch the rest of that quarter either, but I do know that the rest of Korver's scoring consisted of 4 clutch FTs and ONE big three hit right in Reke's face -- the defense and challenge were good. Korver was better.

And so then we have you:


And given that in my review of 30 of Reke's 40 minutes he allowed ZERO points, and that Korver drained exactly ONE shot on him, perhaps you might come to see that you are not exactly wachign these games through the fairest lenses when it comes to Reke.

P.S. Oh, and BTW, we scored 115pts against a Chicago team leading the league by only allowing 87 per game coming in. No other team in the league had done that this year. Meaning no other "magicial veteran PG who will fix everything" had led their team to as much success against that defense as Reke led his to yesterday.

The last killer shot by Korver for a 3 he was "guarded" by Tyreke who was guarding nobody. He was in "no-man's land", which has been thouroughly elaborated and visually demonstrated, is what he does. That's an F. Then there are the times that he let Korver be wide open when Chicago didn't get Korver the ball (fortunately for the Kings). That's an F. And Donte, if he was guarding Korver, he too gets an F for defense. See, I'm not bias.;) It's precisely these brain-dead plays that are costing the Kings victories. These aren't rookies anymore, and they don't deserve grade inflation for key mistakes at key parts of the game.
 
Back
Top