Gay is overrated now and injury-prone. His effort is inconsistent too. Some nights he looks like an all-start and other nights he disappears on both sides of the floor. Could care less if they keep him or anyone else. No team wanted his bloated contract, and will not get his player option matched with his suit-up ratio, no way. Management drafting has been so poor year-in and year-out its no wonder they keep bringing in new faces, but getting the same loser results. The new owner clearly does not want to pay ceiling prices for talent when injuries and fall-outs like Arenas or Webber occur, while the athletes want all-in security of max contracts. The NBA has allowed salaries to balloon too much. The end results for teams with poor organization and talent is ticket sales and revenue will get hit. Its an entertainment business with wins and losses as easy metrics, and its hard to pay to watch a loser. This season's draft problem started when last years team won 4 or 5 meaningless games when playoffs were already out of the picture that meant 2-3 draft positions. While that necessarily didn't ensure anything intrinsically, in general higher draft picks bring more latitude on draft day. And yet, when you have buffoons drafting poorly, draft positioning matters less. Kings organization stinks more poorly than their team; Ex-players may not be great executives. Pro sports are about as fickle as anything, and support as about as predictable as the wind. As long as you're winning everything is ok though.