Grades v. Bucks 11/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
#31
The team works hard to get Peja those point blank lay-ups. PEJA works hard to get those shots too. He's GOT to convert on those.
That was a joke, paraphrase of Brick's Web missed but there were good shots.
Using the same criteria Peja missed good shots too. On top of that when you take a look at final statistics he was efficient and probably (didn't check) the most efficient King's scorer in that game.
 

piksi

Hall of Famer
#32
outsider62 said:
That was a joke, paraphrase of Brick's Web missed but there were good shots.
Using the same criteria Peja missed good shots too. On top of that when you take a look at final statistics he was efficient and probably (didn't check) the most efficient King's scorer in that game.
that would be Ostertag
 
#33
18 shots and 18 points may be efficient by NBA standards, but not necessarily for Peja.

I recall him having 9/15 30+ pt games last year. In LA, he went something like 12/17 for 37 pts, which is unreal.

Peja vs himself, the grade is fair. Peja vs the league of chucking stars, the grade is low.

If Bricklayer open grades based on expectation, then there really isn't a problem... but then again, you could end up penalizing someone for doing too well, and expecting that to be the norm, instead of the exception.

Anyways, it's much ado about nothing :)
 
#34
peja16 said:
Anyways, it's much ado about nothing :)
I agree about everything you said espacially with quoted sentence. I said I have no problem with grades, I was just curious to see Bricks reaction.

I must admit I was wrong. He actually stated recently he was wrong (about drafting Peja).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.